RP SIA \u201cR\u012bgas satiksme\u201d (RS) nanotehnolo\u0123iju liet\u0101 prokurat\u016bra atzinusi par cietu\u0161o, tom\u0113r uz\u0146\u0113mums l\u012bdz \u0161im nav piepras\u012bjis kompens\u0101ciju, to pamatojot ar nesniegto iesp\u0113ju iepaz\u012bties ar izmekl\u0113\u0161anas gait\u0101 noskaidrotajiem nozieguma apst\u0101k\u013ciem. Septembr\u012b ir pabeigts pirmstiesas krimin\u0101lprocess, bet kad var\u0113tu notikt pirm\u0101 tiesas s\u0113de, v\u0113l p\u0101ragri spriest.<\/b><\/p>\n
\u017durn\u0101lu \u201cIepirkumi\u201d RP SIA \u201cR\u012bgas satiksme\u201d inform\u0113, ka t\u0101 ir sa\u0146\u0113musi br\u012bdin\u0101jumu par krimin\u0101lprocesa zi\u0146u neizpau\u0161anu saska\u0146\u0101 ar Krimin\u0101lprocesa likuma 396. pantu, l\u012bdz ar ko nedr\u012bkst izpaust zi\u0146as par krimin\u0101lprocesu par t.s. nanotehnolo\u0123isko virsmu apstr\u0101des \u0137\u012bmisko l\u012bdzek\u013cu pieg\u0101d\u0113m. Vienlaic\u012bgi attiec\u012bb\u0101 uz publiski izskan\u0113ju\u0161o inform\u0101ciju, nor\u0101d\u0101m \u2013 RP SIA \u201cR\u012bgas satiksme\u201d par cietu\u0161o personu pieteic\u0101s atbilsto\u0161i izmekl\u0113\u0161anas iest\u0101\u017eu nor\u0101d\u012btajam, ka saist\u012bb\u0101 ar t.s. nanotehnolo\u0123isko virsmu apstr\u0101des \u0137\u012bmisko l\u012bdzek\u013cu pieg\u0101d\u0113m \u201cR\u012bgas satiksme\u201d ir noticis noziedz\u012bgs nodar\u012bjums. Piesak\u0101majai mantisk\u0101 kait\u0113juma (zaud\u0113jumu) summai ir j\u0101b\u016bt noskaidrotai un pamatotai ar konkr\u0113tiem pier\u0101d\u012bjumiem par konkr\u0113tiem faktiem. T.i. RP SIA \u201cR\u012bgas satiksme\u201d k\u0101 cietu\u0161ajam pieteikt\u0101 mantisk\u0101 kait\u0113juma summa b\u016bs j\u0101pamato ar pier\u0101d\u012bjumiem. Ta\u010du, t\u0101 k\u0101 patlaban RP SIA \u201cR\u012bgas satiksme\u201d ir ierobe\u017eotas iesp\u0113jas izprast noziedz\u012bg\u0101 nodar\u012bjuma apst\u0101k\u013cus sakar\u0101 ar to, ka tai nav bijusi iesp\u0113ja iepaz\u012bties ar izmekl\u0113\u0161anas iest\u0101\u017eu noskaidrotajiem faktiem un inform\u0101ciju, kas var\u0113tu apliecin\u0101t konkr\u0113tu mantisk\u0101 kait\u0113juma apm\u0113ru, tad lemt par pieteikuma iesnieg\u0161anu par kait\u0113juma apm\u0113ru \u201cR\u012bgas satiksme\u201d var\u0113s tikai\u00a0 tad, kad \u0161\u0101du inform\u0101ciju RP SIA \u201cR\u012bgas satiksme\u201d b\u016bs sa\u0146\u0113musi. Saska\u0146\u0101 ar Krimin\u0101lprocesa likuma 95. panta un 96. panta noteikumiem jaut\u0101jumu par cietu\u0161\u0101 statusa pie\u0161\u0137ir\u0161anu un iesp\u0113jam\u0101 kait\u0113juma kompens\u0101cijas iesnieg\u0161anas nepiecie\u0161am\u012bbu un t\u0101 pamatot\u012bbu pie\u0146emsim l\u012bdz tiesas izmekl\u0113\u0161anas s\u0101kumam,\u201d apliecina RP SIA \u201cR\u012bgas satiksme\u201d Sabiedrisko attiec\u012bbu noda\u013cas vad\u012bt\u0101ja Baiba Barta\u0161evi\u010da.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Septembr\u012b ir pabeigts pirmstiesas krimin\u0101lprocess, apliecina Organiz\u0113t\u0101s noziedz\u012bbas un citu nozaru specializ\u0113t\u0101s prokurat\u016bras prokurors Dainis \u0160teinbergs. Tiek veikts tehniskais darbs, nodro\u0161inot krimin\u0101llietas materi\u0101lu kopijas izsnieg\u0161anai aps\u016bdz\u0113tajiem un cietu\u0161ajiem. Saska\u0146\u0101 ar Krimin\u0101lprocesa likuma 412. panta desmito da\u013cu p\u0113c krimin\u0101llietas materi\u0101lu kopiju izsnieg\u0161anas un sa\u0146emot inform\u0101ciju no aps\u016bdz\u0113tiem par to, vai vi\u0146\u0161 v\u0113las aizst\u0101vja piedal\u012b\u0161anos lietas izties\u0101\u0161an\u0101, kuras personas, p\u0113c aizst\u0101v\u012bbas dom\u0101m, b\u016btu izsaucamas uz tiesas s\u0113di un\/vai aps\u016bdz\u0113tais piekr\u012bt iesp\u0113jai, ka krimin\u0101llietu aps\u016bdz\u012bb\u0101 vai t\u0101s patst\u0101v\u012bg\u0101 da\u013c\u0101 tiesa izskata bez pier\u0101d\u012bjumu p\u0101rbaudes, prokurors pie\u0146em l\u0113mumu par krimin\u0101llietas nodo\u0161anu tiesai.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
RP SIA \u201cR\u012bgas satiksme\u201d (RS) krimin\u0101lliet\u0101 saist\u012bb\u0101 ar nanotehnolo\u0123isko virsmu apstr\u0101des \u0137\u012bmisko l\u012bdzek\u013cu pieg\u0101d\u0113m prokurat\u016bra atzinusi par cietu\u0161o. Vai b\u016btu lo\u0123iski, ka no RS puses tiktu pieteikta kait\u0113juma kompens\u0101cija?<\/b><\/p>\n
D.\u0160teinbergs:<\/b> \u2013 Jebkuram krimin\u0101lproces\u0101 atz\u012btam cietu\u0161ajam ir ties\u012bbas, nevis pien\u0101kums iesniegt pieteikumu par rad\u012bt\u0101 kait\u0113juma kompens\u0101ciju. To cietu\u0161ais ir ties\u012bgs dar\u012bt l\u012bdz tiesas izmekl\u0113\u0161anas uzs\u0101k\u0161anai pirm\u0101s instances ties\u0101. Attiec\u012bb\u0101 uz SIA \u201eR\u012bgas Satiksme\u201d poz\u012bciju, t\u0101 ir vi\u0146u br\u012bva izv\u0113le piepras\u012bt, noties\u0101jo\u0161a sprieduma gad\u012bjum\u0101, no noties\u0101tiem \u0161o kait\u0113jumu vai n\u0113. Krimin\u0101lprocesa virz\u012bbu tas neietekm\u0113. Viens no krimin\u0101lprocesa pamatprincipiem ir ties\u012bbas uz kompens\u0101ciju par rad\u012bto kait\u0113jumu, kas nosaka, ka personai, kurai ar noziedz\u012bgu nodar\u012bjumu rad\u012bts kait\u0113jums, \u0146emot v\u0113r\u0101 t\u0101s mor\u0101lo aizsk\u0101rumu, fizisk\u0101s cie\u0161anas un mantisko zaud\u0113jumu, tiek garant\u0113tas procesu\u0101l\u0101s iesp\u0113jas mor\u0101las un materi\u0101las kompens\u0101cijas piepras\u012b\u0161anai un sa\u0146em\u0161anai. \u0160\u0101das procesu\u0101l\u0101s iesp\u0113jas piepras\u012bt materi\u0101lo kompens\u0101ciju SIA \u201eR\u012bgas Satiksme\u201d tika nodro\u0161in\u0101tas. Piem\u0113ram, min\u0113t\u0101 krimin\u0101lprocesa ietvaros ar\u012b Valsts ie\u0146\u0113mumu dienests tika inform\u0113ts par t\u0101 ties\u012bb\u0101m l\u016bgt b\u016bt atz\u012btam par cietu\u0161o un pieteikt kait\u0113juma kompens\u0101ciju, \u0146emot v\u0113r\u0101, ka nodok\u013cu apr\u0113\u0137ina rezult\u0101t\u0101 tika konstat\u0113ti zaud\u0113jumi valsts bud\u017eetam. \u0160\u012bs ties\u012bbas Valsts ie\u0146\u0113mumu dienests k\u0101 Latvijas valsts p\u0101rst\u0101vis ir izmantojis, tika atz\u012bts par cietu\u0161o un pieteica kait\u0113juma kompens\u0101ciju. Krimin\u0101lprocesa ietvaros tika risin\u0101ti mantiskie jaut\u0101jumi, tostarp, uzlikti aresti naudas l\u012bdzek\u013ciem un nekustamiem \u012bpa\u0161umiem, lai, noties\u0101jo\u0161a sprieduma gad\u012bjum\u0101 nodro\u0161in\u0101tu cietu\u0161ajiem nodar\u012bt\u0101 kait\u0113juma kompens\u0101cijas piedzi\u0146u. Krimin\u0101lprocesos, kur cietu\u0161ie nepiesaka kait\u0113juma kompens\u0101ciju, tie neatg\u016bst radu\u0161os zaud\u0113jumus no arest\u0113tiem naudas l\u012bdzek\u013ciem.<\/p>\n
Jau v\u0113st\u012bts, ka saist\u012bb\u0101 ar nanotehnolo\u0123isko virsmu apstr\u0101des \u0137\u012bmisko l\u012bdzek\u013cu pieg\u0101d\u0113m RS par vienu\u00a0iepirkumu\u00a0nodar\u012bti zaud\u0113jumi 482 060 eiro apm\u0113r\u0101, bet par otru 352 182 eiro. Kas ir iepirkuma priek\u0161mets, no k\u0101 veidojas min\u0113t\u0101s summas? Ko RS pl\u0101noja iepirkt un ko sa\u0146\u0113ma? Past\u0101stiet nedaudz vair\u0101k par \u0161iem iepirkumiem! <\/b><\/p>\n
D.\u0160teinbergs:<\/b> \u2013 Izmekl\u0113\u0161anas ietvaros noskaidrots, ka abos iepirkumos organiz\u0113t\u0101s grupas dal\u012bbnieki sp\u0113ja nodro\u0161in\u0101t, ka iepirkumos tiek uzaicin\u0101ti tikai organiz\u0113t\u0101s grupas tie\u0161\u0101 un pastarpin\u0101t\u0101 kontrol\u0113 eso\u0161ie uz\u0146\u0113mumi, kas turkl\u0101t nav nodarboju\u0161ies ar nanotehnolo\u0123isko \u0137\u012bmijas l\u012bdzek\u013cu tirdzniec\u012bbu vai izplat\u012b\u0161anu, t\u0101d\u0113j\u0101di nodro\u0161inot l\u012bgumu nosl\u0113g\u0161anu ar 2 organiz\u0113t\u0101s grupas tie\u0161\u0101 un pastarpin\u0101t\u0101 kontrol\u0113 eso\u0161iem uz\u0146\u0113mumiem par noteikta ra\u017eot\u0101ja nanotehnolo\u0123isk\u0101s \u0137\u012bmijas l\u012bdzek\u013cu pieg\u0101di par organiz\u0113t\u0101s grupas izv\u0113l\u0113tu sad\u0101rdzin\u0101to cenu. Izmekl\u0113\u0161anas ietvaros noskaidrots, ka noteikto ra\u017eot\u0101ju nanotehnolo\u0123isko \u0137\u012bmiju saska\u0146\u0101 ar l\u012bguma specifik\u0101ciju organiz\u0113t\u0101s grupas dal\u012bbnieki SIA \u201eR\u012bgas Satiksme\u201d nav pieg\u0101d\u0101ju\u0161i. Organiz\u0113t\u0101s grupas kontrol\u0113 eso\u0161ie uz\u0146\u0113mumi pieg\u0101d\u0101ja nezin\u0101mas izcelsmes l\u012bdzek\u013cus SIA \u201eR\u012bgas Satiksme\u201d noliktav\u0101, un organiz\u0113t\u0101s grupas dal\u012bbnieks, kur\u0161 bija vienlaikus ar\u012b SIA \u201eR\u012bgas Satiksme\u201d amatpersona, nodro\u0161in\u0101ja, ka uz\u0146\u0113mums neuzzina par l\u012bgumam neatbilsto\u0161u pre\u010du pieg\u0101di. SIA \u201eR\u012bgas Satiksme\u201d, uzskatot, ka ir sa\u0146\u0113musi preces atbilsto\u0161i l\u012bguma pras\u012bb\u0101m, apmaks\u0101ja r\u0113\u0137inus piln\u0101 apm\u0113r\u0101, t\u0101d\u0113j\u0101di organiz\u0113t\u0101s grupas dal\u012bbnieki sa\u0146\u0113ma naudas l\u012bdzek\u013cus, kurus da\u013c\u0113ji v\u0113l\u0101k legaliz\u0113ja.<\/p>\n
\u2013 T\u0101pat prokurors iepriek\u0161 izteicis br\u012bdin\u0101jumu R\u012bgas domei un RS saist\u012bb\u0101 ar RS\u00a0iepirkuma\u00a0proced\u016bru neatbilst\u012bbu likuma pras\u012bb\u0101m. Vai variet \u0161o koment\u0113t s\u012bk\u0101k, ko tie\u0161i prokurors saskat\u012bja k\u0101 likumam neatbilsto\u0161u? Ja prokurat\u016bras likum\u0101 skaidrots, ka p\u0113c prokurora br\u012bdin\u0101juma sa\u0146em\u0161anas ir j\u0101veic darb\u012bbas, lai konstat\u0113tas nelikum\u012bbas nov\u0113rstu, vai tas \u0161aj\u0101 gad\u012bjum\u0101 no RS puses ticis veikts?<\/b><\/p>\n
D.\u0160teinbergs:<\/b> \u2013 Attiec\u012bb\u0101 uz SIA \u201eR\u012bgas Satiksme\u201d iepirkumiem tiek piem\u0113rots Sabiedrisko pakalpojumu sniedz\u0113ju iepirkumu likums, jo uz\u0146\u0113mums nodro\u0161ina transporta pakalpojumus publisk\u0101s lieto\u0161anas tramvaju, trolejbusu un autobusu ce\u013cu transporta t\u012bklos. Min\u0113tais likums reglament\u0113 iepirkuma proced\u016bras (atkl\u0101ts konkurss; sl\u0113gts konkurss; sarunu proced\u016bra, public\u0113jot dal\u012bbas uzaicin\u0101jumu; sarunu proced\u016bra, nepublic\u0113jot dal\u012bbas uzaicin\u0101jumu; konkursa dialogs; inov\u0101cijas partner\u012bbas proced\u016bra) sabiedrisko pakalpojumu sniedz\u0113jiem, ja l\u012bgumcena ir vien\u0101da ar Ministru kabineta noteiktaj\u0101m l\u012bgumcenu robe\u017ev\u0113rt\u012bb\u0101m vai liel\u0101ka (443 000 eiro pieg\u0101des un pakalpojumu l\u012bgumiem). T\u0101tad iepirkumu proced\u016bras par iepirkumiem ar l\u012bgumcenu zem 443 000 eiro tiek regul\u0113tas uz\u0146\u0113muma iek\u0161\u0113jos noteikumos, likuma pras\u012bbas uz \u0161iem iepirkumiem neattiecas.<\/p>\n
Izmekl\u0113\u0161anas ietvaros noskaidrots, ka <\/span><\/span>SIA \u201eR\u012bgas Satiksme\u201d sagatavotie<\/span><\/span> iepirkuma noteikumi bija visp\u0101r\u0113ji, tajos nebija noteiktas pras\u012bbas attiec\u012bb\u0101 uz iepirkuma priek\u0161metu, pras\u012bbas pretendentiem, nenosaka gad\u012bjumus, k\u0101dos pretendenti tiek izsl\u0113gti no dal\u012bbas turpm\u0101k\u0101 iepirkuma proced\u016br\u0101. Virssliek\u0161\u0146a iepirkumiem \u0161\u012bs pras\u012bbas izriet no Sabiedrisko pakalpojumu sniedz\u0113ju iepirkumu likuma 47. panta, bet uz zemsliek\u0161\u0146a iepirkumiem \u0161\u012bs pras\u012bbas neattiecas. T\u0101pat p\u0101rbaudes gait\u0101 secin\u0101ts, ka ar\u012b zemsliek\u0161\u0146a iepirkumos nav pie\u013caujama sl\u0113gta pretendentu izv\u0113le, k\u0101 tas ir \u0161obr\u012bd, kad iepirkumu komisijai bez tirgus anal\u012bzes vai k\u0101da cit\u0101da pamatojuma tiek nor\u0101d\u012bti uz\u0146\u0113mumi, kurus uzaicin\u0101t piedal\u012bties cenu aptauj\u0101, jo t\u0101d\u0101 veid\u0101 tiek grauta konkurence, nost\u0101dot izv\u0113l\u0113tos uz\u0146\u0113mumus augst\u0101k par p\u0101r\u0113jiem to konkurentiem un t\u0101d\u0113j\u0101di radot tiem noteiktas priek\u0161roc\u012bbas. \u0160o apst\u0101kli izmantoja organiz\u0113ta grupa, nodro\u0161inot, ka cenu aptauj\u0101 tiek uzaicin\u0101ti tikai vi\u0146u kontrol\u0113 eso\u0161ie uz\u0146\u0113mumi, kaut gan \u0161ie uz\u0146\u0113mumi nekad nav nodarboju\u0161ies ar \u0161\u0101da veida l\u012bdzek\u013cu tirdzniec\u012bbu, t\u0101tad tos nevar\u0113ja noskaidrot, veicot tirgus anal\u012bzi, un gandr\u012bz visiem \u0161iem uz\u0146\u0113mumiem bija nodok\u013cu par\u0101di, bet tie netika izsl\u0113gti no dal\u012bbas cenu aptauj\u0101.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n Augst\u0101k\u0101s tiesas prakses apkopojum\u0101 publisko iepirkumu liet\u0101s nor\u0101d\u012bts, ka publisko iepirkumu ties\u012bbu pamatj\u0113ga irnodro\u0161in\u0101t iepirkuma priek\u0161meta pie\u0161\u0137ir\u0161an\u0101 vienl\u012bdz\u012bgu attieksmi, kas izsl\u0113gtu starp pretendentiem negod\u012bgu konkurenci, iepriek\u0161 zin\u0101mu priek\u0161roc\u012bbu pie\u0161\u0137ir\u0161anu noteiktam pretendentam iepretim citiem konkurentiem. Tiesas nost\u0101ja balst\u012bta Eiropas Savien\u012bbas Tiesas atzi\u0146\u0101s (Eiropas Savien\u012bbas Visp\u0101r\u0113j\u0101s Tiesas spriedums liet\u0101 T-384\/10; Eiropas Savien\u012bbas Tiesas spriedums liet\u0101 C\u20116\/05; Eiropas Savien\u012bbas tiesas spriedums liet\u0101 C-538\/07), kas nosaka, ka ar\u012b zemsliek\u0161\u0146a l\u012bguma sl\u0113g\u0161anas ties\u012bbu pie\u0161\u0137ir\u0161anas proced\u016bra nevar b\u016bt patva\u013c\u012bga un taj\u0101 j\u0101iev\u0113ro pre\u010du br\u012bvas aprites, ties\u012bbas veikt uz\u0146\u0113m\u0113jdarb\u012bbu, pakalpojumu snieg\u0161anas br\u012bv\u012bbas, nediskrimin\u0101cijas un vienl\u012bdz\u012bgas attieksmes, p\u0101rskat\u0101m\u012bbas, proporcionalit\u0101tes un savstarp\u0113jas atz\u012b\u0161anas principi. Min\u0113t\u0101s atzi\u0146as izriet no Eiropas Parlamenta un Padomes direkt\u012bvas 2014\/25\/ES par iepirkumu, ko \u012bsteno subjekti, kuri darbojas \u016bdensapg\u0101des, ener\u0123\u0113tikas, transporta un pasta pakalpojumu nozar\u0113s, un ar ko atce\u013c Direkt\u012bvu 2004\/17\/EK, kuras preambul\u0101 nor\u0101d\u012bts, ka attiec\u012bb\u0101 uz iepirkumu, kam ir zem\u0101ka v\u0113rt\u012bba par robe\u017ev\u0113rt\u012bbu, no kuras s\u0101k piem\u0113rot Savien\u012bbas l\u012bme\u0146a koordin\u0113\u0161anas noteikumus, ieteicams v\u0113rst uzman\u012bbu uz Eiropas Savien\u012bbas Tiesas judikat\u016bru attiec\u012bb\u0101 uz L\u012bguma noteikumu un principu pareizu piem\u0113ro\u0161anu.<\/p>\n Latvijas Republikas Augst\u0101k\u0101s tiesas Sen\u0101ta Administrat\u012bvo lietu departaments 2013. gada 1. j\u016blija l\u0113mum\u0101 liet\u0101 SKA\u00a0\u2013\u00a0524\/2013 nor\u0101d\u012bja, ka ar\u012b sabiedrisko pakalpojumu sniedz\u0113ju iepirkumi, kas nesasniedz robe\u017ev\u0113rt\u012bbu un uz kuru organiz\u0113\u0161anu likumi neattiecina detaliz\u0113tas pras\u012bbas, nevar b\u016bt patva\u013c\u012bgi. Tas atspogu\u013cojas cit\u0101 normat\u012bvaj\u0101 ties\u012bbu akt\u0101, kas regul\u0113 publisk\u0101 iepirkuma jomu \u2013 Publisko iepirkumu likum\u0101 (PIL). PIL 8.1<\/sup> pants paredz noregul\u0113jumu iepirkumiem, kuru l\u012bgumcena nesasniedz noteiktu robe\u017ev\u0113rt\u012bbu. Nepast\u0101vot b\u016btisk\u0101m at\u0161\u0137ir\u012bb\u0101m noregul\u0113juma m\u0113r\u0137os, PIL 8.1<\/sup> pant\u0101 (likuma 2013. gada 1. augusta redakcij\u0101 \u2013 8.2<\/sup> pant\u0101 \u2013 \u0161\u0101 br\u012b\u017ea likuma redakcij\u0101 \u2013 9. pant\u0101) min\u0113to ties\u012bbu aizsardz\u012bbas meh\u0101nismu var piem\u0113rot p\u0113c analo\u0123ijas sabiedrisko pakalpojumu sniedz\u0113ju r\u012bkotos iepirkumos. T\u0101d\u0113j\u0101di tiktu nodro\u0161in\u0101ta efekt\u012bva priv\u0101tpersonu ties\u012bbu aizsardz\u012bba neatkar\u012bgi no publisk\u0101 iepirkuma organiz\u0113t\u0101ja, k\u0101 ar\u012b neatkar\u012bgi no pretendenta pieder\u012bbas k\u0101dai Eiropas Savien\u012bbas dal\u012bbvalstij vai iesaist\u012btaj\u0101m interes\u0113m. \u0160\u0101du atkl\u0101tu, konkur\u0113tsp\u0113j\u012bgu iepirkumu organiz\u0113\u0161ana ar\u012b mazin\u0101tu iesp\u0113jamos korupcijas riskus uz\u0146\u0113mum\u0101.<\/p>\n \u012asum\u0101 t\u0101 ir prokurora br\u012bdin\u0101juma b\u016bt\u012bba: lai nodro\u0161in\u0101tu atkl\u0101tu, konkur\u0113tsp\u0113j\u012bgu iepirkumu organiz\u0113\u0161anu, iev\u0113rojot pre\u010du br\u012bvas aprites, ties\u012bbas veikt uz\u0146\u0113m\u0113jdarb\u012bbu, pakalpojumu snieg\u0161anas br\u012bv\u012bbas, vienl\u012bdz\u012bgas attieksmes, p\u0101rskat\u0101m\u012bbas principus, t\u0101d\u0101 veid\u0101 ar\u012b izpild\u012btu likuma \u201ePar valsts un pa\u0161vald\u012bbu finan\u0161u l\u012bdzek\u013cu un mantas iz\u0161\u0137\u0113rd\u0113\u0161anas nov\u0113r\u0161anu\u201d 3. panta pirm\u0101s da\u013cas 1. un 3. punkta pras\u012bbas nodro\u0161in\u0101t lietder\u012bgu kapit\u0101lsabiedr\u012bbas finan\u0161u l\u012bdzek\u013cu izmanto\u0161anu.<\/p>\n \u0145emot v\u0113r\u0101 uz\u0146\u0113muma apm\u0113ru un to, ka \u0161obr\u012bd tiek \u012bstenotas jau ies\u0101kt\u0101s proced\u016bras, ir uzdots nodro\u0161in\u0101t SIA \u201cR\u012bgas Satiksme\u201d iek\u0161\u0113jo normat\u012bvo aktu un iepirkumu proced\u016bru atbilst\u012bbu publisko iepirkumu tiesiskajam regul\u0113jumam, par ko pazi\u0146ot prokurat\u016brai ne v\u0113l\u0101k k\u0101 l\u012bdz 2018. gada 1. novembrim.<\/p>\n Cik person\u0101m ir uzr\u0101d\u012bta aps\u016bdz\u012bba? Vai varat koment\u0113t \u0161o s\u012bk\u0101k? <\/b><\/p>\n D.\u0160teinbergs:<\/b> \u2013 Aps\u016bdz\u012bbas ir izvirz\u012btas \u010detr\u0101m person\u0101m. Tr\u012bs person\u0101m inkrimin\u0113ti divi noziedz\u012bgi nodar\u012bjumi par kr\u0101p\u0161anu liel\u0101 apm\u0113r\u0101 organiz\u0113t\u0101 grup\u0101, ar viltu ieg\u016bstot naudas l\u012bdzek\u013cus no SIA \u201cR\u012bgas Satiksme\u201d par pirmo iepirkumu 482 060, 38 eiro un par otro iepirkumu 352 182, 22 eiro, kop\u0101 834 242,60 eiro. K\u0101 ar\u012b papildus tiek inkrimin\u0113ti divi noziedz\u012bgi nodar\u012bjumi par noziedz\u012bgi ieg\u016btu l\u012bdzek\u013cu legaliz\u0101ciju liel\u0101 apm\u0113r\u0101 organiz\u0113t\u0101 grup\u0101, legaliz\u0113jot pirm\u0101 iepirkum\u0101 ieg\u016btos ne maz\u0101k k\u0101 274 851, 06 eiro un otr\u0101 iepirkum\u0101 ieg\u016btos ne maz\u0101k k\u0101 292 693,72 eiro. Papildus vienai no \u0161\u012bm person\u0101m inkrimin\u0113ta dienesta st\u0101vok\u013ca \u013caunpr\u0101t\u012bga izmanto\u0161ana mantk\u0101r\u012bg\u0101 nol\u016bk\u0101, kas izrais\u012bja smagas sekas, proti, amatpersona iesniedzot iepirkuma piepras\u012bjumu, kur\u0101 nor\u0101d\u012bja uz\u0146\u0113mumus, kurus faktiski kontrol\u0113 vienas un t\u0101s pa\u0161as personas, kas savstarp\u0113ji saska\u0146oja un noteica zem\u0101ko pied\u0101v\u0101juma cenu, k\u0101 ar\u012b zinot, ka iepirkuma piepras\u012bjum\u0101 nor\u0101d\u012btie uz\u0146\u0113mumi nedarbojas attiec\u012bgaj\u0101 nozar\u0113, un nep\u0101rbaudot uz\u0146\u0113mumu kvalifik\u0101ciju un uzticam\u012bbu, k\u0101 ar\u012b nekontrol\u0113jot SIA \u201eR\u012bgas Satiksme\u201d transportl\u012bdzek\u013cu t\u012br\u012b\u0161anai nepiecie\u0161amo mazg\u0101\u0161anas un \u0137\u012bmisko l\u012bdzek\u013cu atbilst\u012bbu un kvalit\u0101ti, lai SIA \u201eR\u012bgas Satiksme\u201d neuzzina par pieg\u0101d\u0101t\u0101m prec\u0113m, kas neatbilst l\u012bgumu tehniskajai specifik\u0101cijai, r\u012bkoj\u0101s pret\u0113ji uz\u0146\u0113muma interes\u0113m ar m\u0113r\u0137i, lai iepirkumu proces\u0101 uzvar konkr\u0113ts pa\u0161a izv\u0113l\u0113ts uz\u0146\u0113mums un l\u012bguma darb\u012bbas rezult\u0101t\u0101 sa\u0146emtu naudas l\u012bdzek\u013cus, ko izv\u0113l\u0113tais uz\u0146\u0113mums ieg\u016bs no SIA \u201eR\u012bgas Satiksme\u201d. Ceturtajai personai inkrimin\u0113ts viens noziedz\u012bgs nodar\u012bjums par kr\u0101p\u0161anu un viens noziedz\u012bgs nodar\u012bjums par noziedz\u012bgi ieg\u016btu l\u012bdzek\u013cu legaliz\u0113\u0161anu.<\/p>\n Uzzi\u0146a<\/b><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n RP SIA \u201cR\u012bgas satiksme\u201d nor\u0101da, ka t\u0101 iepirkumus veic saska\u0146\u0101 ar Sabiedrisko pakalpojumu sniedz\u0113ju iepirkumu likumu (iep\u0113rkot preces, pakalpojumus un b\u016bvdarbus sabiedrisk\u0101 transporta pakalpojuma nodro\u0161in\u0101\u0161anai) un Publisko iepirkumu likumu (darbojoties dele\u0123\u0113t\u0101 p\u0101rvaldes uzdevuma ietvaros, t.i.,\u00a0 apsaimniekojot R\u012bgas pils\u0113tas maksas autost\u0101vvietas un nodro\u0161inot pa\u0161vald\u012bbas instit\u016bcijas ar autotransportu). <\/p>\n \u201cIzmekl\u0113\u0161anas ietvaros noskaidrots, ka abos iepirkumos organiz\u0113t\u0101s grupas dal\u012bbnieki sp\u0113ja nodro\u0161in\u0101t, ka iepirkumos tiek uzaicin\u0101ti tikai organiz\u0113t\u0101s grupas tie\u0161\u0101 un pastarpin\u0101t\u0101 kontrol\u0113 eso\u0161ie uz\u0146\u0113mumi, kas turkl\u0101t nav nodarboju\u0161ies ar nanotehnolo\u0123isko \u0137\u012bmijas l\u012bdzek\u013cu tirdzniec\u012bbu vai izplat\u012b\u0161anu, t\u0101d\u0113j\u0101di nodro\u0161inot l\u012bgumu nosl\u0113g\u0161anu ar 2 organiz\u0113t\u0101s grupas tie\u0161\u0101 un pastarpin\u0101t\u0101 kontrol\u0113 eso\u0161iem uz\u0146\u0113mumiem par noteikta ra\u017eot\u0101ja nanotehnolo\u0123isk\u0101s \u0137\u012bmijas l\u012bdzek\u013cu pieg\u0101di par organiz\u0113t\u0101s grupas izv\u0113l\u0113tu sad\u0101rdzin\u0101to cenu,\u201d inform\u0113 Organiz\u0113t\u0101s noziedz\u012bbas un citu nozaru specializ\u0113t\u0101s prokurat\u016bras prokurors Dainis \u0160teinbergs.<\/p>\n TEKSTS: DAINA V\u0100RPI\u0145A<\/b><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" RP SIA \u201cR\u012bgas satiksme\u201d (RS) nanotehnolo\u0123iju liet\u0101 prokurat\u016bra atzinusi par cietu\u0161o, tom\u0113r uz\u0146\u0113mums l\u012bdz \u0161im nav piepras\u012bjis kompens\u0101ciju, to pamatojot ar nesniegto iesp\u0113ju iepaz\u012bties ar izmekl\u0113\u0161anas gait\u0101 noskaidrotajiem nozieguma apst\u0101k\u013ciem. Septembr\u012b ir pabeigts pirmstiesas krimin\u0101lprocess, bet kad var\u0113tu notikt pirm\u0101 tiesas s\u0113de, v\u0113l p\u0101ragri spriest.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[71],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9990"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=9990"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9990\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10050,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9990\/revisions\/10050"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=9990"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=9990"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=9990"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}