\u0160\u0101 gada “Iepirkumi” febru\u0101ra numur\u0101 st\u0101st\u012bj\u0101m par d\u012bvainu VAS “Latvijas valsts ce\u013ci” (“LVC”) iepirkumu, kura r\u012bkotaj\u0101 ce\u013cu apr\u012bko\u0161anas konkurs\u0101 uzvar\u0113t\u0101ja SIA “Reck” pied\u0101v\u0101ja cenu, kas 2,5 reizes p\u0101rsniedz pakalpojumam pl\u0101notos 3,6 miljonus eiro. Otru, l\u0113t\u0101ku pretendentu no Lietuvas \u2013 SIA “FIMA” \u2013 noraid\u012bja nepietiekam\u0101s pieredzes d\u0113\u013c, kas, ekspertupr\u0101t, bija nepamatoti, jo \u0161\u0101 uz\u0146\u0113muma apak\u0161uz\u0146\u0113mums “KEMEK Engineering” ar “LVC” sadarbojas kop\u0161 1999. gada, bet kop\u0161 2005. gada uzvar \u0161\u0101da veida konkursos. “FIMA” l\u0113mumu p\u0101rs\u016bdz\u0113ja Iepirkumu uzraudz\u012bbas biroj\u0101 (IUB), apak\u0161uz\u0146\u0113m\u0113ja valdes priek\u0161s\u0113d\u0113t\u0101js Elmars Petersons ar\u012b nor\u0101d\u012bja uz ZZS politi\u0137a Rolanda B\u0101re\u0146a ietekm\u0113\u0161anas m\u0113\u0123in\u0101jumu l\u0113muma pie\u0146em\u0161an\u0101. Aizvad\u012btajos m\u0113ne\u0161os “LVC” tom\u0113r izdevies atrast spraugas likumos un d\u0101rgo l\u012bgumu ar SIA “Reck”, visticam\u0101k, sl\u0113gs.<\/b><\/p>\n
IUB aizliedza sl\u0113gt l\u012bgumu ar SIA “Reck”, k\u0101 teikts IUB \u0161\u0101 gada 29. janv\u0101ra l\u0113mum\u0101, pirms “p\u0101rk\u0101pumu nov\u0113r\u0161anas”. Tom\u0113r “LVC” nesaprotamu iemeslu d\u0113\u013c \u0161o pretendentu aizvien uzskata par vislab\u0101ko. IUB vad\u012bt\u0101ja Dace Gaile raid\u012bjumam “Nek\u0101 person\u012bga” st\u0101st\u012bja, ka “LVC”, visticam\u0101k, vajadz\u0113ja izbeigt iepirkumu bez rezult\u0101ta. Tom\u0113r “LVC” atkal izv\u0113l\u0113j\u0101s vienoties ar d\u0101rg\u0101ko pretendentu SIA “Reck”. Lai p\u0101rliecin\u0101tu valsti, ka izv\u0113le ir laba, uz\u0146\u0113mums nol\u0113ma t\u0113r\u0113t vismaz 10 000 eiro v\u0113l vienam p\u0113t\u012bjumam par \u0161\u0101 iepirkuma l\u0113muma izdev\u012bgumu. Ja auditoru sl\u0113dziens valsts uz\u0146\u0113mumu apmierin\u0101s, tad iecer\u0113ts pras\u012bt papildu naudu valsts bud\u017eet\u0101. “LVC” valdes loceklis Edgars Strods raid\u012bjumam pau\u017e, ka 8 miljoni eiro ir adekv\u0101ta naudas summa \u0161im iepirkumam.
\n
\nAgr\u0101k bija apr\u0113\u0137in\u0101ts, ka n\u0101kamajos tr\u012bs gados projektam j\u0101t\u0113r\u0113 4 miljoni eiro. Satiksmes ministrs Uldis Augulis agr\u0101k “Nek\u0101 person\u012bga” teica, ka pie \u0161\u012bs summas ar\u012b b\u016btu j\u0101pieturas. Patlaban politi\u0137is dom\u0101 at\u0161\u0137ir\u012bgi. P\u0101rsteidz, ka konkursa zaud\u0113t\u0101js “FIMA” nol\u0113mis IUB “LVC” l\u0113mumu nep\u0101rs\u016bdz\u0113t. “FIMA” uzvar\u0113jis k\u0101d\u0101 cit\u0101 “LVC” konkurs\u0101, uz\u0146\u0113mums apr\u012bkos “via Baltica” \u0161oseju. Otrs pretendents konkurs\u0101 bija SIA “Reck”, kas s\u0101kotn\u0113ji bija iesniedzis s\u016bdz\u012bbu IUB, bet nu to ir atsaucis.<\/p>\n
“FIMA” vad\u012bt\u0101ja Olita Augustovska raid\u012bjumam noliedz, ka savus l\u0113mumus b\u016btu saska\u0146ojusi ar SIA “Reck”. To pa\u0161u “iepirkumiem” apstiprin\u0101ja ar\u012b “FIMA” Korporat\u012bvo attiec\u012bbu direktore Laura Geistarde \u2013 \u0160ube. Vi\u0146a skaidro, ka c\u012b\u0146a ar “RECK” 3,6 miljonu iepirkum\u0101 “notikusi l\u012bdz galam”, proti, l\u012bdz br\u012bdim, kad sa\u0146emts IUB l\u0113mums par nekvalific\u0113\u0161anos iepirkum\u0101. “Respekt\u0113j\u0101m \u0161o IUB l\u0113mumu. Sa\u0146emot inform\u0101ciju, ka esam uzvar\u0113ju\u0161i otr\u0101 iepirkum\u0101 \u2013 proti, par darbiem uz E67 ce\u013ca, fokus\u0113j\u0101mies uz \u0161\u0101 projekta realiz\u0101cijas s\u0101k\u0161anu,” t\u0101 L. Geistarde \u2013 \u0160ube.<\/p>\n
Savuk\u0101rt SIA “Kemek Engineering” valdes priek\u0161s\u0113d\u0113t\u0101js Elmars Petersons v\u0113r\u0161 uzman\u012bbu, ka “SIA “Reck” uzvar\u0113ja, pateicoties fikt\u012bvam apliecin\u0101jumam par apak\u0161uz\u0146\u0113m\u0113ja kvalifik\u0101ciju, kuru IUB nep\u0101rbaud\u012bja. “Protams, t\u0101 bija “Latvijas valsts ce\u013cu” iepirkumu komisijas locek\u013cu nolaid\u012bba \u2013 tas maigi sakot, t\u0101 bija ieinteres\u0113t\u012bba neskat\u012bt lietu p\u0113c b\u016bt\u012bbas attiec\u012bb\u0101 ar\u012b uz “Reck” kvalifik\u0101ciju. Mums, k\u0101 apak\u0161uz\u0146\u0113m\u0113jam, ir neapg\u0101\u017eami pier\u0101d\u012bjumi, ka “Reck” apak\u0161uz\u0146\u0113m\u0113ji ir viltoju\u0161i savu kvalifik\u0101ciju. To ne “LVC”, ne ar\u012b IUB nep\u0101rbaud\u012bja. Kaut gan kvalifik\u0101cija bija pras\u012bta par specifisku metrolo\u0123ijas jomu. IUB darbinieki nav speci\u0101listi metrolo\u0123ij\u0101,” teic E. Petersons. <\/p>\n
“Kemek Enginering” par “Reck” neatbilst\u012bbu konkursa nosac\u012bjumiem iesniedza s\u016bdz\u012bbu IUB, kas to nepie\u0146\u0113ma (iemesls \u2013 to iesniedza apka\u0161uz\u0146\u0113m\u0113js). IUB \u0161o s\u016bdz\u012bbu p\u0101rs\u016bt\u012bja “LVC”. T\u0101tad, visas puses zin\u0101ja par \u0161aub\u0101m attiec\u012bb\u0101 uz “Reck” kvalifik\u0101ciju. <\/p>\n
“Mums ir \u013coti b\u0113d\u012bgi, ka SIA “FIMA”, zinot \u0161o m\u016bsu argumentu, neizmantoja to un l\u0113ma nep\u0101rs\u016bdz\u0113t “LVC” l\u0113mumu. Vienlaikus SIA “FIMA” atzina par uzvar\u0113t\u0101ju l\u012bdz\u012bg\u0101 “LVC” konkurs\u0101, kur ar\u012b piedal\u012bj\u0101s “Reck” un “FIMA”, kur “Reck” iesniedza s\u016bdz\u012bbu. “Sakrita”, ka s\u016bdz\u012bbu atsauca. M\u016bsupr\u0101t, notika tirgus dal\u012b\u0161ana, sarun\u0101\u0161ana un t\u0101 t\u0101l\u0101k. Tas ir b\u0113d\u012bgi … V\u0113l b\u0113d\u012bg\u0101k man k\u0101 Latvijas pilsonim ir, ka FIMA vad\u012bt\u0101ja Olita Augustovska ir bijus\u012b Ministru prezidenta Valda Dombrovska biroja vad\u012bt\u0101ja. Tas ir no\u017e\u0113lojami,” t\u0101 E. Petersons. <\/p>\n
Kas t\u0101l\u0101k? “Kemek Enginering” rakst\u012bs s\u016bdz\u012bbu IUB par “LVC” iepirkumu komisijas locek\u013cu atbild\u012bbu, neizv\u0113rt\u0113jot konkursa kvalifik\u0101cijas rezult\u0101tus. Latvijas Administrat\u012bvo p\u0101rk\u0101pumu kodeksa 166. panta 23. punkts \u013cauj to dar\u012bt. “Protams, m\u0113s neatcelsim konkursa rezult\u0101tus. Rad\u012bsim precedentu. Cik zinu, Latvij\u0101 v\u0113l t\u0101da nav bijis,” saka E. Petersons. Vi\u0146\u0161 ar\u012b piebilst – ir v\u0113l palikusi iesp\u0113ja v\u0113rsties Konkurences padom\u0113. “M\u016bsupr\u0101t, \u0161eit notika aizliegta vieno\u0161an\u0101s,” uzskata uz\u0146\u0113m\u0113js.<\/p>\n
Uz jaut\u0101jumu par iesp\u0113jamo piedal\u012b\u0161anos tirgus dal\u012b\u0161an\u0101 (Latvij\u0101 ir \u013coti maz uz\u0146\u0113mumu, kas var veikt specifiskus metrolo\u0123iskos darbus), “FIMA” p\u0101rst\u0101ve rakstveid\u0101 atbild\u0113ja: – B\u016btiski uzsv\u0113rt, ka tirgus segments gan Baltij\u0101 kopum\u0101, gan Latvij\u0101 ir specifisks un \u0161aurs. “Smart E67″ ir pirmais inteli\u0123ento transporta risin\u0101jumu projekts Latvij\u0101 un atkl\u0101taj\u0101 konkurs\u0101 ikvienam uz\u0146\u0113mumam, kas sp\u0113j\u012bgs izpild\u012bt iepirkum\u0101 noteikt\u0101s pras\u012bbas, bija iesp\u0113ja taj\u0101 piedal\u012bties. E67 iepirkum\u0101 \u2013 SIA \u201cFIMA\u201d pied\u0101v\u0101jums tika atz\u012bts par atbilsto\u0161u vis\u0101m kvalifik\u0101cijas pras\u012bb\u0101m, k\u0101 ar\u012b p\u0113c cenas bij\u0101m lab\u0101kie. SIA \u201cFIMA\u201d regul\u0101ri piedal\u0101s da\u017e\u0101dos konkursos, kas izsludin\u0101ti gan no valsts, gan priv\u0101tu uz\u0146\u0113mumu puses, un m\u0113s savas izredzes projektu \u012bsteno\u0161an\u0101 balst\u0101m tikai un vien\u012bgi uz m\u016bsu kol\u0113\u0123u un tehnolo\u0123isko partneru profesion\u0101laj\u0101m kompetenc\u0113m. Esam orient\u0113ti uz ilgtermi\u0146a rezult\u0101tiem, kuru pamat\u0101 ir kvalitat\u012bvi un pilnv\u0113rt\u012bgi in\u017eeniertehnolo\u0123iskie pakalpojumi. Iest\u0101jamies par god\u012bgu konkurenci, caursp\u012bd\u012bgiem iepirkumu procesiem un profesion\u0101lu darbu, t\u0101d\u0113\u013c norobe\u017eojamies no jebk\u0101d\u0101m interpret\u0101cij\u0101m \u0161o iepirkumu sakar\u0101.”<\/p>\n
Savuk\u0101rt Konkurences padomes priek\u0161s\u0113d\u0113t\u0101ja Skaidr\u012bte \u0100brama \u0161aj\u0101 gad\u012bjum\u0101 saskata risku, ka var\u0113tu b\u016bt notikusi aizliegta vieno\u0161an\u0101s. Vi\u0146a ar\u012b pie\u013cauj, ka augsto cenu veicin\u0101jis uz\u0146\u0113mums “LVC”, pieprasot p\u0101r\u0101k daudz pakalpojumu vien\u0101 iepirkum\u0101, kur var pieteikties tikai divi uz\u0146\u0113mumi Latvij\u0101.<\/p>\n
“LVC” saka, ka likums prasa uz\u0146\u0113mumam vienoties ar SIA “Reck”, neraugoties uz milz\u012bgo cenu.<\/p>\n
Raid\u012bjuma “Nek\u0101 person\u012bga” aptauj\u0101tie Saeimas deput\u0101ti izteica gatav\u012bbu main\u012bt PIL un paredz\u0113t taj\u0101 pien\u0101kumu valsts iest\u0101d\u0113m un uz\u0146\u0113mumiem pietur\u0113ties pie cenas, k\u0101du pa\u0161i iepirkumam paredz\u0113ju\u0161i. Pat, ja deput\u0101ti tuv\u0101kaj\u0101 laik\u0101 likumu main\u012bs, eso\u0161o iepirkumu tas neietekm\u0113s. Uz pag\u0101tni likuma izmai\u0146as nedarbojas un “LVC” deput\u0101tu viedokli var ne\u0146emt v\u0113r\u0101.<\/p>\n
“LVC” valdes loceklis Strods cer, ka valsts papildus naudu iedos un ar d\u0101rgo pieg\u0101d\u0101t\u0101ju izdosies vienoties, lai jau gada otraj\u0101 pus\u0113 var\u0113tu s\u0101kt luksoforu uzst\u0101d\u012b\u0161anas darbus. SIA “Reck” pied\u0101v\u0101jums paredz, ka \u0161os darbus veiks apak\u0161uz\u0146\u0113mums “Lucidus” (agr\u0101k “Moduls Interjers”), kas da\u013c\u0113ji pieder uz\u0146\u0113m\u0113ja M\u0101ra Martinsona b\u0113rniem.<\/p>\n
“LVC” ir secin\u0101ts, ka lietuvie\u0161u uz\u0146\u0113muma “FIMA” pied\u0101v\u0101jums \u0161aj\u0101 konkurs\u0101 ir bijis ar p\u0101r\u0101k pazemin\u0101t\u0101m cen\u0101m. Tom\u0113r tas nav trauc\u0113jis \u0161o uz\u0146\u0113mumu pasludin\u0101t par uzvar\u0113t\u0101ju cit\u0101 “LVC” konkurs\u0101.<\/p>\n
TEKSTS: Sandris Gunvaldis
\n ILUSTR\u0100CIJA: Aldis Roc\u0113ns<\/b><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
\u0160\u0101 gada \u201cIepirkumi\u201d febru\u0101ra numur\u0101 st\u0101st\u012bj\u0101m par d\u012bvainu VAS \u201cLatvijas valsts ce\u013ci\u201d (\u201cLVC\u201d) iepirkumu, kura r\u012bkotaj\u0101 ce\u013cu apr\u012bko\u0161anas konkurs\u0101 uzvar\u0113t\u0101ja SIA \u201cReck\u201d pied\u0101v\u0101ja cenu, kas 2,5 reizes p\u0101rsniedz pakalpojumam pl\u0101notos 3,6 miljonus eiro. Otru, l\u0113t\u0101ku pretendentu no Lietuvas \u2013 SIA \u201cFIMA\u201d \u2013 noraid\u012bja nepietiekam\u0101s pieredzes d\u0113\u013c, kas, ekspertupr\u0101t, bija nepamatoti, jo \u0161\u0101 uz\u0146\u0113muma apak\u0161uz\u0146\u0113mums \u201cKEMEK Engineering\u201d ar \u201cLVC\u201d sadarbojas kop\u0161 1999. gada, bet kop\u0161 2005. gada uzvar \u0161\u0101da veida konkursos. \u201cFIMA\u201d l\u0113mumu p\u0101rs\u016bdz\u0113ja Iepirkumu uzraudz\u012bbas biroj\u0101 (IUB), apak\u0161uz\u0146\u0113m\u0113ja valdes priek\u0161s\u0113d\u0113t\u0101js Elmars Petersons ar\u012b nor\u0101d\u012bja uz ZZS politi\u0137a Rolanda B\u0101re\u0146a ietekm\u0113\u0161anas m\u0113\u0123in\u0101jumu l\u0113muma pie\u0146em\u0161an\u0101. Aizvad\u012btajos m\u0113ne\u0161os \u201cLVC\u201d tom\u0113r izdevies atrast spraugas likumos un d\u0101rgo l\u012bgumu ar SIA \u201cReck\u201d, visticam\u0101k, sl\u0113gs.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[233],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9295"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=9295"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9295\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9323,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9295\/revisions\/9323"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=9295"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=9295"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=9295"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}