Turpin\u0101jums, s\u0101k skat. “iepirkumi” 2017.g. j\u016bnija un 2017. septembra numur\u0101<\/p>\n
Pied\u0101v\u0101juma iesnieg\u0161ana termi\u0146\u0101 un “aiz skapja aizkritu\u0161a pied\u0101v\u0101juma” v\u0113l\u0101ka iek\u013cau\u0161ana v\u0113rt\u0113jum\u0101<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n Pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101jam ir j\u0101noteic pied\u0101v\u0101jumu iesnieg\u0161anas termi\u0146\u0161. Termi\u0146\u0161 noteicams tiesisk\u0101s apgroz\u012bbas dro\u0161\u012bbai un noteikt\u012bbai. Pretendentam j\u0101iesniedz pied\u0101v\u0101jums tam atv\u0113l\u0113taj\u0101 termi\u0146\u0101. Pied\u0101v\u0101jumu iesnieg\u0161anas laika ilgumam j\u0101b\u016bt sam\u0113rotam ar l\u012bguma priek\u0161meta sare\u017e\u0123\u012bt\u012bbu un pied\u0101v\u0101juma sagatavo\u0161anas laiku. Pied\u0101v\u0101jums l\u012bdz pied\u0101v\u0101jumu iesnieg\u0161anas termi\u0146a beig\u0101m nedr\u012bkst tikt atkl\u0101ts (sk. Publisko iepirkumu likuma 65. panta sept\u012bt\u0101s da\u013cas 2. un 3.\u00a0punktu<\/i>). Visp\u0101r\u012bg\u0101s vieno\u0161an\u0101s 10.\u00a0punkts noteic, ka p\u0113c pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101ja uzaicin\u0101juma v\u0113stul\u0113 nor\u0101d\u012bt\u0101 pied\u0101v\u0101jumu iesnieg\u0161anas termi\u0146a beig\u0101m pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101js atkl\u0101t\u0101 san\u0101ksm\u0113 atver iesniegtos pied\u0101v\u0101jumus. \u0160is noteikums v\u0113rsts uz publisko iepirkumu organiz\u0113\u0161anas atkl\u0101tuma un p\u0101rredzam\u012bbas sasnieg\u0161anu (sk. Publisko iepirkumu likuma 2.\u00a0panta 1.\u00a0punktu<\/i>). Ar p\u0101rredzam\u012bbas principu nav savienojama situ\u0101cija, ka p\u0113c pied\u0101v\u0101jumu atkl\u0101tas atv\u0113r\u0161anas pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101js pied\u0101v\u0101jumu vid\u016b iek\u013cauj citus, v\u0113l\u0101k iesniegtus pied\u0101v\u0101jumus. Situ\u0101cija, kad pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101ja r\u012bc\u012bb\u0101 ir biju\u0161i pied\u0101v\u0101jumi, ta\u010du tie atv\u0113r\u0161anas san\u0101ksm\u0113 nav tiku\u0161i atv\u0113rti, ir at\u0161\u0137ir\u012bga. T\u0101 ir procesu\u0101la k\u013c\u016bda, kas pie\u013cauta pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101ja darb\u012bb\u0101, organiz\u0113jot publisko iepirkumu, un rada apdraud\u0113jumu citu pretendentu, kas piedal\u0101s iepirkum\u0101, uztic\u012bbai p\u0101rskat\u0101mai un atkl\u0101tai proced\u016brai, objekt\u012bvai un god\u012bgai iepirkuma norisei. Tom\u0113r \u0161o k\u013c\u016bdu nevar liegt pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101jam nov\u0113rst, v\u0113l\u0101k atkl\u0101ti izskaidrojot p\u0101r\u0113jiem pretendentiem t\u0101s ra\u0161an\u0101s iemeslus. T\u0101pat likums pie\u013cauj pretendentam, kas tom\u0113r netic pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101ja r\u012bc\u012bbas attaisnojumam, pras\u012bt tiesas kontroli p\u0101r iepirkumu un tostarp \u0161o procesu\u0101lo aspektu. Pretendents nevar pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101jam dikt\u0113t noteikumus<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n Konkursa nolikuma pras\u012bbu noteik\u0161ana ir pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101ja r\u012bc\u012bbas br\u012bv\u012bba. T\u0101 ir v\u0113rsta uz to, lai pied\u0101v\u0101jums atbilstu pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101ja iecer\u0113m un tas sa\u0146emtu iepirkuma priek\u0161metam atbilsto\u0161u un kvalitat\u012bvu izpild\u012bjumu. Pretendentiem izvirz\u012bto kvalifik\u0101cijas pras\u012bbu noteik\u0161ana ir tie\u0161i pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101ja r\u012bc\u012bbas br\u012bv\u012bba. T\u0101 v\u0113rsta uz to, lai pied\u0101v\u0101jums atbilstu pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101ja iecer\u0113m un tas sa\u0146emtu iepirkuma priek\u0161metam atbilsto\u0161u un p\u0113c iesp\u0113jas kvalitat\u012bvu izpild\u012bjumu. T\u0101d\u0113\u013c pretendentu un ar\u012b tiesas v\u0113rt\u0113jums par to, ka attiec\u012bgo pakalpojumu, iesp\u0113jams, var izpild\u012bt ar\u012b ar zem\u0101ku vai ar citu kvalifik\u0101ciju, liel\u0101 m\u0113r\u0101 b\u016btu spekulat\u012bvs un \u0101rpus to kompetences. Citiem v\u0101rdiem, pretendents nevar pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101jam dikt\u0113t noteikumus, ar k\u0101du kvalifik\u0101ciju apvelt\u012btiem j\u0101b\u016bt pretendentiem vai to atbild\u012bgaj\u0101m person\u0101m kvalitat\u012bva pakalpojuma sa\u0146em\u0161anas nodro\u0161in\u0101\u0161anai. Ar\u012b tiesa, to darot, iejauktos pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101ja kompetenc\u0113. Nenoliedzami, \u0161\u0101da iest\u0101des br\u012bv\u012bba nevar p\u0101rk\u0101pt nepiecie\u0161am\u0101s robe\u017eas, kas attaisno nevis atbilsto\u0161a pakalpojuma sa\u0146em\u0161anu, bet citas intereses.<\/p>\n Izv\u0113loties saimnieciski visizdev\u012bg\u0101ko pied\u0101v\u0101jumu, l\u012bgumsl\u0113dz\u0113jas iest\u0101des var ne tikai br\u012bvi izv\u0113l\u0113ties l\u012bguma pie\u0161\u0137ir\u0161anas krit\u0113rijus, bet ar\u012b noteikt to sadal\u012bjuma koeficientus, ar nosac\u012bjumu, ka tie \u013cauj \u012bstenot kop\u0113ju v\u0113rt\u0113jumu krit\u0113rijiem, kas tiek piem\u0113roti, lai identific\u0113tu saimnieciski visizdev\u012bg\u0101ko pied\u0101v\u0101jumu (sk. Eiropas Savien\u012bbas Tiesas 2005. gada 27. oktobra sprieduma liet\u0101 C\u2011234\/03\u00a068.\u00a0punktu<\/i>). Turkl\u0101t saska\u0146\u0101 ar vienl\u012bdz\u012bgas attieksmes un nediskrimin\u0101cijas principiem da\u017e\u0101du krit\u0113riju vai papildu krit\u0113riju sadal\u012bjuma koeficientus nevar noteikt, \u0146emot v\u0113r\u0101 elementus, kam var b\u016bt diskrimin\u0113jo\u0161a ietekme attiec\u012bb\u0101 uz pretendentiem (sk. Eiropas Savien\u012bbas Tiesas 2005. gada 24. novembra sprieduma liet\u0101 C\u2011331\/04\u00a032.\u00a0punktu). L\u012bdz ar to tie\u0161i pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101ja r\u012bc\u012bbas br\u012bv\u012bba ir noteikt t\u0101dus saimnieciski visizdev\u012bg\u0101k\u0101 pied\u0101v\u0101juma v\u0113rt\u0113\u0161anas krit\u0113rijus un to skaitlisk\u0101s v\u0113rt\u012bbas, ar kuriem uzskata, ka sp\u0113s ieg\u0101d\u0101ties t\u0101 vajadz\u012bb\u0101m visatbilsto\u0161\u0101ko un saimnieciski visizdev\u012bg\u0101ko pied\u0101v\u0101jumu. Apak\u0161uz\u0146\u0113m\u0113ja j\u0113dziens un t\u0101 nor\u0101d\u012b\u0161anas pien\u0101kums<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n Ja sadarb\u012bbas partneris ir uzskat\u0101ms par apak\u0161uz\u0146\u0113m\u0113ju, tad pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101js var pras\u012bt to nor\u0101d\u012bt. Tas izriet no Publisko iepirkumu likuma 20.\u00a0panta pirm\u0101s da\u013cas, kas noteic, ka pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101js nol\u016bk\u0101 p\u0101rliecin\u0101ties, ka pieg\u0101d\u0101t\u0101js sp\u0113s izpild\u012bt iepirkuma l\u012bgumu, ir ties\u012bgs piepras\u012bt, lai pretendents sav\u0101 pied\u0101v\u0101jum\u0101 nor\u0101da t\u0101s l\u012bguma da\u013cas, kuras nodos izpildei apak\u0161uz\u0146\u0113m\u0113jiem, k\u0101 ar\u012b visus paredzamos apak\u0161uz\u0146\u0113mumus. Atbilsto\u0161i Publisko iepirkumu likuma 20.\u00a0panta sestajai da\u013cai apak\u0161uz\u0146\u0113m\u0113js pakalpojumu l\u012bgumos ir pretendenta piesaist\u012bta vai nol\u012bgta persona, kura sniedz pakalpojumus, kas nepiecie\u0161ami ar pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101ju nosl\u0113gta publiska pakalpojumu l\u012bguma izpildei. K\u0101 secin\u0101ms no lietas materi\u0101liem kopum\u0101, tas, ko dar\u012btu pieteic\u0113jas sadarb\u012bbas partneris, sav\u0101cot “za\u013cos” atkritumus, nav pakalpojums pa\u0161vald\u012bbai, bet gan veids, k\u0101 \u0161is partneris ieg\u016btu atkritumus k\u0101 preci, ko tam p\u0101rdotu pieteic\u0113ja. Tas, ka sadarb\u012bbas partneris \u0161o preci pats pie\u0146emtu no iedz\u012bvot\u0101jiem, Augst\u0101k\u0101s tiesas ieskat\u0101, nemaina iepriek\u0161 secin\u0101to. Ilustr\u0101cijai izmantojama l\u012bdz\u012bba ar zeme\u0146u tirdzniec\u012bbu: da\u017ek\u0101rt zeme\u0146u audz\u0113t\u0101ji \u013cauj pirc\u0113jiem pa\u0161iem salas\u012bt ogas uz lauka to audz\u0113\u0161anas viet\u0101, p\u0113c tam t\u0101s nosverot un p\u0101rdodot person\u0101m, kas t\u0101s salas\u012bja; t\u0101d\u0101 veid\u0101 zeme\u0146u pirc\u0113ji nesniedz pakalpojumu zeme\u0146u nov\u0101k\u0161an\u0101, bet ieg\u0101d\u0101jas preci par zem\u0101ku cenu, nek\u0101 nop\u0113rkot jau sav\u0101ktas ogas. Ar\u012b ja zeme\u0146u lauks nepieder tirgot\u0101jam, bet t\u0101 \u012bpa\u0161nieks ir at\u013c\u0101vis t\u0101s nov\u0101kt un tirgot citai personai, ogu pirc\u0113ji nesniedz pakalpojumu \u012bpa\u0161niekam. T\u0101tad, ja pa\u0161vald\u012bba b\u016btu pie\u0161\u0137\u012brusi ties\u012bbas sav\u0101kt atkritumus pieteic\u0113jai, bet t\u0101 atkritumus p\u0101rdotu savam sadarb\u012bbas partnerim, lai ar\u012b atkritumu sav\u0101k\u0161anas viet\u0101, tas neb\u016btu uzskat\u0101ms par pakalpojumu pa\u0161vald\u012bbai. T\u0101 k\u0101 tas neb\u016btu uzskat\u0101ms par pakalpojumu pa\u0161vald\u012bbai, tas nav uzskat\u0101ms par ar pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101ju nosl\u0113gt\u0101 publisk\u0101 pakalpojuma l\u012bguma da\u013cu, kura nodota izpildei apak\u0161uz\u0146\u0113m\u0113jiem. T\u0101d\u0113j\u0101di pieteic\u0113jas sadarb\u012bbas partneris (vai partneri), kuram tiek p\u0101rdoti atkritumi, nav uzskat\u0101ms par apak\u0161uz\u0146\u0113m\u0113ju (apak\u0161uz\u0146\u0113m\u0113jiem). Pavadv\u0113stules par iepirkuma komisijas l\u0113muma pazi\u0146o\u0161anu procesu\u0101l\u0101 daba<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n Tiesisk\u0101s attiec\u012bbas tiek nodibin\u0101tas un pieteic\u0113jai tiesiskas sekas tiek rad\u012btas ar pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101jas l\u0113mumu, kas noform\u0113ts protokola veid\u0101. Savuk\u0101rt pazi\u0146ojums, ar kuru pieteic\u0113jai tiek pazi\u0146ots par pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101jas l\u0113mumu un pielikum\u0101 pievienots l\u0113muma protokola izraksts, ir uzskat\u0101ms tikai par informat\u012bvu v\u0113stuli. Pazi\u0146ojumam nepiem\u012bt Administrat\u012bv\u0101 procesa likuma 1.\u00a0panta tre\u0161aj\u0101 da\u013c\u0101 noteikt\u0101s paz\u012bmes un tas pats par sevi neietekm\u0113 administrat\u012bv\u0101 akta (protokola) sp\u0113k\u0101 st\u0101\u0161anos. Tam ir noz\u012bme vien\u012bgi attiec\u012bb\u0101 uz pieteic\u0113jas procesu\u0101laj\u0101m ties\u012bb\u0101m iepirkuma rezult\u0101tu apstr\u012bd\u0113\u0161an\u0101. Iepirkumu uzraudz\u012bbas biroja p\u0101rbaudes robe\u017eas<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n Publisko iepirkumu likuma 81. panta 7.\u00a0punkt\u0101 noteikts, ka Iepirkumu uzraudz\u012bbas birojs izskata iesniegumus par iepirkuma proced\u016bras p\u0101rk\u0101pumiem. Atbilsto\u0161i Publisko iepirkumu likuma 83.\u00a0panta ceturt\u0101s da\u013cas 3.\u00a0punktam iesniegum\u0101 Iepirkumu uzraudz\u012bbas birojam par pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101ja vai iepirkumu komisijas darb\u012bbu ietverami fakti, par kuriem iesniegts iesniegums, nor\u0101dot p\u0101rk\u0101pumu. Min\u0113t\u0101 likuma 84.\u00a0panta sest\u0101 da\u013ca noteic, ka komisija izv\u0113rt\u0113 iesniegumu, pamatojoties uz t\u0101 iesniedz\u0113ja un [iesnieguma izskat\u012b\u0161anas s\u0113des] dal\u012bbnieku min\u0113tajiem faktiem, pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101ja paskaidrojumiem un eksperta viedokli vai atzinumu. Savuk\u0101rt liet\u0101 piem\u0113rotais likuma 83.1<\/sup>\u00a0panta pirm\u0101s da\u013cas 3.\u00a0punkts paredz biroja ties\u012bbas atst\u0101t iesniegumu bez izskat\u012b\u0161anas, ja iesniegum\u0101 ietvert\u0101s zi\u0146as ir ac\u012bmredzami nepietiekamas iesniedz\u0113ja pras\u012bbas apmierin\u0101\u0161anai vai iesniegums ir ac\u012bmredzami noraid\u0101ms p\u0113c b\u016bt\u012bbas. Papildus tam min\u0113t\u0101s da\u013cas 2.\u00a0punkts paredz biroja ties\u012bbas atst\u0101t iesniegumu bez izskat\u012b\u0161anas, ja jau iepriek\u0161 ticis iesniegts un izskat\u012bts iesniegums attiec\u012bb\u0101 uz iepirkuma proced\u016bru par to pa\u0161u priek\u0161metu un uz t\u0101 pa\u0161a pamata. No min\u0113taj\u0101m norm\u0101m izriet skaidra sist\u0113ma, ka Iepirkumu uzraudz\u012bbas birojs, izskatot iesniegumu (vai atst\u0101jot to bez izskat\u012b\u0161anas), ir saist\u012bts ar iesniegum\u0101 nor\u0101d\u012bto p\u0101rk\u0101puma pamatu, t.\u00a0i., faktiem par noteikt\u0101 veid\u0101 izpaudu\u0161os p\u0101rk\u0101pumu. Nosl\u0113gt\u0101 l\u012bguma atz\u012b\u0161ana par sp\u0113k\u0101 neeso\u0161u vai termi\u0146a sa\u012bsin\u0101\u0161ana<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n Likumdev\u0113js, iek\u013caujot Publisko iepirkumu likum\u0101 XII1\u00a0noda\u013cu, izv\u0113l\u0113j\u0101s nodot administrat\u012bvajai tiesai ties\u012bbas lemt par priv\u0101ttiesisku iepirkuma l\u012bgumu tikai konkr\u0113tos Publisko iepirkumu likuma 85.2<\/sup>\u00a0panta pirmaj\u0101 da\u013c\u0101 uzskait\u012btos gad\u012bjumos. Neviens no \u0161aj\u0101 pant\u0101 uzskait\u012btajiem gad\u012bjumiem neattiecas uz tiem iepirkumiem, kas veicami Publisko iepirkumu likuma 8.2<\/sup>\u00a0pant\u0101 noteiktaj\u0101 k\u0101rt\u012bb\u0101 (proti, uz “mazajiem” iepirkumiem, kuriem nepiem\u0113ro likum\u0101 regul\u0113t\u0101s iepirkuma proced\u016bras). L\u012bdz ar to likumdev\u0113js nav paredz\u0113jis Publisko iepirkumu likuma 8.2<\/sup>\u00a0pant\u0101 noteiktaj\u0101 k\u0101rt\u012bb\u0101 nosl\u0113gtu iepirkuma l\u012bgumu (k\u0101 \u0161aj\u0101 gad\u012bjum\u0101) atz\u012bt par sp\u0113k\u0101 neeso\u0161u, atce\u013camu vai p\u0101rtraucamu administrat\u012bv\u0101 procesa k\u0101rt\u012bb\u0101. \u0145emot v\u0113r\u0101 min\u0113to, tiesa nevar lemt par Publisko iepirkumu likuma 8.2<\/sup>\u00a0panta noteiktaj\u0101 k\u0101rt\u012bb\u0101 nosl\u0113gt\u0101 iepirkuma l\u012bguma atz\u012b\u0161anu par sp\u0113k\u0101 neeso\u0161u un pieteikumu \u0161aj\u0101 da\u013c\u0101 ir atsak\u0101ms pie\u0146emt, pamatojoties uz Administrat\u012bv\u0101 procesa likuma 191.\u00a0panta pirm\u0101s da\u013cas 1.\u00a0punktu. Eiropas Savien\u012bbas likumdev\u0113js ir devis nor\u0101des dal\u012bbvalstu likumdev\u0113jam pan\u0101kt to, ka iepirkumu l\u012bgumi netiek nosl\u0113gti, kam\u0113r nav beidzies nogaid\u012b\u0161anas termi\u0146\u0161. Sankcij\u0101m j\u0101b\u016bt pat tad, ja iepirkuma proced\u016br\u0101 ir pie\u013cauti tikai form\u0101li p\u0101rk\u0101pumi, kas nav ietekm\u0113ju\u0161i iepirkumu p\u0113c b\u016bt\u012bbas. Nogaid\u012b\u0161anas termi\u0146a iev\u0113ro\u0161anai pie\u0161\u0137irta liela noz\u012bme, jo t\u0101 m\u0113r\u0137is ir dot iesp\u0113ju pretendentiem efekt\u012bvi apstr\u012bd\u0113t p\u0101rk\u0101pumus iepirkumu proced\u016br\u0101. \u0145emot to v\u0113r\u0101, Publisko iepirkumu likuma 85.2<\/sup>\u00a0panta pirmaj\u0101 da\u013c\u0101 v\u0101rdkop\u0101 “tiesa iepirkuma l\u012bgumu var atz\u012bt par sp\u0113k\u0101 neeso\u0161u, groz\u012bt vai atcelt to noteikumus vai sa\u012bsin\u0101t l\u012bguma termi\u0146u” ietvertais v\u0101rds “var” ir interpret\u0113jams \u0161auri, attiecinot to tikai uz izv\u0113li starp t\u0101l\u0101k nor\u0101d\u012btaj\u0101m sek\u0101m\u00a0\u2013 atz\u012bt l\u012bgumu par sp\u0113k\u0101 neeso\u0161u, groz\u012bt vai atcelt t\u0101 noteikumus vai sa\u012bsin\u0101t l\u012bguma termi\u0146u\u00a0\u2013, nevis uz izv\u0113li starp to, vai visp\u0101r k\u0101das no \u0161\u012bm sek\u0101m ir piem\u0113rojamas. Proti, tiesai ir dota satura izv\u0113le, bet nav dota izdo\u0161anas izv\u0113le. Savuk\u0101rt Publisko iepirkumu likuma 85.3<\/sup>\u00a0panta piektaj\u0101 da\u013c\u0101 ietvert\u0101 norma, kas piem\u0113rojama gad\u012bjumos, kad iepirkuma proced\u016bra l\u012bdz l\u0113muma pie\u0146em\u0161anai par uzvar\u0113t\u0101ja noteik\u0161anu ir veikta tiesiski un l\u0113mums nav ietekm\u0113jis pieteic\u0113ja izredzes ieg\u016bt l\u012bguma sl\u0113g\u0161anas ties\u012bbas (k\u0101 tas ir izskat\u0101maj\u0101 gad\u012bjum\u0101), sa\u0161aurina iepriek\u0161 min\u0113to seku izv\u0113li, izsl\u0113dzot no t\u0101 iesp\u0113ju atz\u012bt l\u012bgumu par sp\u0113k\u0101 neeso\u0161u no nosl\u0113g\u0161anas br\u012b\u017ea. Izv\u0113le paliek tikai starp diviem sprieduma veidiem\u00a0\u2013 groz\u012bt vai atcelt l\u012bguma noteikumus, papildus sa\u012bsinot l\u012bguma termi\u0146u vai tikai sa\u012bsin\u0101t iepirkuma l\u012bguma termi\u0146u. Autors: J\u0101nis Neimanis<\/b> Pied\u0101v\u0101juma iesnieg\u0161ana termi\u0146\u0101 un \u201caiz skapja aizkritu\u0161a pied\u0101v\u0101juma\u201d v\u0113l\u0101ka iek\u013cau\u0161ana v\u0113rt\u0113jum\u0101 <\/p>\n Pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101jam ir j\u0101noteic pied\u0101v\u0101jumu iesnieg\u0161anas termi\u0146\u0161. Termi\u0146\u0161 noteicams tiesisk\u0101s apgroz\u012bbas dro\u0161\u012bbai un noteikt\u012bbai. Pretendentam j\u0101iesniedz pied\u0101v\u0101jums tam atv\u0113l\u0113taj\u0101 termi\u0146\u0101. Pied\u0101v\u0101jumu iesnieg\u0161anas laika ilgumam j\u0101b\u016bt sam\u0113rotam ar l\u012bguma priek\u0161meta sare\u017e\u0123\u012bt\u012bbu un pied\u0101v\u0101juma sagatavo\u0161anas laiku. Pied\u0101v\u0101jums l\u012bdz pied\u0101v\u0101jumu iesnieg\u0161anas termi\u0146a beig\u0101m nedr\u012bkst tikt atkl\u0101ts (sk. Publisko iepirkumu likuma 65. panta sept\u012bt\u0101s da\u013cas 2. un 3. punktu).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[174,71],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8911"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=8911"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8911\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8918,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8911\/revisions\/8918"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=8911"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=8911"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=8911"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\nAT ALD 2016. gada 6. septembra spriedums liet\u0101 Nr. SKA-924\/2016<\/i><\/p>\n
\nAT ALD 2016. gada 17. maija r\u012bc\u012bbas s\u0113des l\u0113mums liet\u0101 Nr. SKA-108\/2016<\/i><\/p>\n
\nAT ALD 2016. gada 24. augusta r\u012bc\u012bbas s\u0113des l\u0113mums liet\u0101 Nr. SKA-117\/2016<\/i><\/p>\n
\nAT ALD 2016. gada 5. septembra spriedums liet\u0101 Nr. SKA-83\/2016<\/i><\/p>\n
\nAT ALD 2016. gada 17. maija r\u012bc\u012bbas s\u0113des l\u0113mums liet\u0101 Nr. SKA-108\/2016<\/i><\/p>\n
\nAT ALD 2016. gada 22. febru\u0101ra spriedums liet\u0101 Nr. SKA-292\/2016<\/i><\/p>\n
\nAT ALD 2016. gada 7. apr\u012b\u013ca l\u0113mums liet\u0101 Nr. SKA-882\/2016<\/i><\/p>\n
\nAT ALD 2016. gada 26. maija spriedums liet\u0101 Nr. SKA-71\/2016<\/i><\/p>\n
\nDr.iur., Augst\u0101k\u0101s tiesas Administrat\u012bvo lietu departamenta tiesnesis, Latvijas Universit\u0101tes Juridisk\u0101s fakult\u0101tes asoci\u0113tais profesors<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"