\u0160\u0101 gada 20. maij\u0101 st\u0101ju\u0161ies sp\u0113k\u0101 groz\u012bjumi Publisko iepirkumu likum\u0101, kas pretendentam, attiec\u012bb\u0101 uz kuru past\u0101v likum\u0101 noteiktie izsl\u0113g\u0161anas nosac\u012bjumi, pie\u0161\u0137ir ties\u012bbas piedal\u012bties iepirkuma proced\u016br\u0101 gad\u012bjumos, kad pretendents sp\u0113j pier\u0101d\u012bt, ka ir veicis nepiecie\u0161amos pas\u0101kumus, lai atjaunotu savu uzticam\u012bbu un nov\u0113rstu l\u012bdz\u012bgu gad\u012bjumu atk\u0101rto\u0161anos. Savuk\u0101rt pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101jam ir pien\u0101kums izv\u0113rt\u0113t pretendenta iesniegtos pier\u0101d\u012bjumus, attiec\u012bgi lemjot par t\u0101 dal\u012bbu iepirkuma proced\u016br\u0101. <\/p>\n
T\u0101 k\u0101 \u0161\u0101ds normat\u012bvais regul\u0113jums Latvij\u0101 iepriek\u0161 nav bijis, \u0161aj\u0101 rakst\u0101 ir sniegts visp\u0101r\u012bgs ieskats par pretendentu “pa\u0161att\u012br\u012b\u0161an\u0101s” (ang\u013cu val. \u2013 self-cleaning) regul\u0113juma m\u0113r\u0137iem, piem\u0113ro\u0161anas nosac\u012bjumiem, k\u0101 ar\u012b atsevi\u0161\u0137iem citiem aspektiem, kas ieinteres\u0113tajiem pieg\u0101d\u0101t\u0101jiem un pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101jiem var b\u016bt aktu\u0101li, to piem\u0113rojot.<\/b><\/p>\n
Visp\u0101r\u012bgs p\u0101rskats<\/font><\/strong><\/p>\n 2014. gada 26. febru\u0101r\u012b pie\u0146emt\u0101 Eiropas Parlamenta un Padomes direkt\u012bva\u00a02014\/24\/ES\u00a0par publisko iepirkumu (Direkt\u012bva 2014\/24\/ES), kuras normas Latvij\u0101 bija j\u0101p\u0101r\u0146em l\u012bdz \u0161\u0101 gada apr\u012blim, paredz virkni pretendentu oblig\u0101to un izv\u0113les izsl\u0113g\u0161anas nosac\u012bjumu, liel\u0101k\u0101 da\u013ca no kuriem ir piem\u0113rota ar\u012b iepriek\u0161.<\/p>\n Proti, atbilsto\u0161i Direkt\u012bvas 2014\/24\/ES 57. pantam, k\u0101 ar\u012b Publisko iepirkumu likuma 39.1 panta pirm\u0101s da\u013cas 1. punktam pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101jam ir pien\u0101kums izsl\u0113gt kandid\u0101tu vai pretendentu no turpm\u0101kas dal\u012bbas iepirkuma proced\u016br\u0101, ja pats kandid\u0101ts vai pretendents vai ar to saist\u012bt\u0101s personas ar sp\u0113k\u0101 st\u0101ju\u0161os tiesas spriedumu ir atz\u012btas par vain\u012bgu (a) dal\u012bb\u0101 noziedz\u012bg\u0101 organiz\u0101cij\u0101, (b) korupt\u012bvu darb\u012bbu veik\u0161an\u0101, (c) kr\u0101p\u0161an\u0101, (d) ar terorismu saist\u012bt\u0101s darb\u012bb\u0101s, (e) cilv\u0113ku tirdzniec\u012bb\u0101 vai (f) saist\u012bb\u0101 ar izvair\u012b\u0161anos no nodok\u013cu nomaksas. L\u012bdz \u0161im sp\u0113k\u0101 eso\u0161ais normat\u012bvais regul\u0113jums paredz\u0113ja, ka, konstat\u0113jot iepriek\u0161min\u0113to apst\u0101k\u013cu iest\u0101\u0161anos, pretendents tiek autom\u0101tiski izsl\u0113gts no turpm\u0101kas dal\u012bbas iepirkuma proced\u016br\u0101. \u0160obr\u012bd l\u012bdz ar p\u0113d\u0113jiem Publisko iepirkumu likuma groz\u012bjumiem \u0161o apst\u0101k\u013cu konstat\u0113\u0161ana pati par sevi nav pietiekams pamats attiec\u012bg\u0101 pretendenta izsl\u0113g\u0161anai, jo pretendentam tiek dota iesp\u0113ja pier\u0101d\u012bt, ka, neraugoties uz iepriek\u0161 pie\u013cautajiem p\u0101rk\u0101pumiem, ir at\u013caujama t\u0101 dal\u012bba iepirkuma proced\u016br\u0101, jo pretendents ir veicis nepiecie\u0161amos pas\u0101kumus, lai pier\u0101d\u012btu savu uzticam\u012bbu un nov\u0113rstu t\u0101du pa\u0161u vai l\u012bdz\u012bgu gad\u012bjumu atk\u0101rto\u0161anos n\u0101kotn\u0113.<\/p>\n K\u0101ds ir \u0161\u0101da “uzticam\u012bbas atjauno\u0161anas” regul\u0113juma m\u0113r\u0137is? <\/font><\/strong><\/p>\n Pamatojums t\u0101du pretendentu izsl\u0113g\u0161anai no dal\u012bbas iepirkuma proced\u016br\u0101, kuri iepriek\u0161 ir pie\u013c\u0101vu\u0161i b\u016btiskus p\u0101rk\u0101pumus, ir div\u0113j\u0101ds. No vienas puses, tai ir prevent\u012bva noz\u012bme, lai nodro\u0161in\u0101tu, ka iepirkuma proced\u016br\u0101 nepiedal\u0101s “uztic\u012bbu” zaud\u0113ju\u0161ie pretendenti, t\u0101d\u0113j\u0101di vienlaikus samazinot pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101ja iesp\u0113jamo zaud\u0113jumu risku konkr\u0113t\u0101s iepirkuma proced\u016bras ietvaros. Nav \u0161aubu, ka \u0161\u0101diem pretendentiem, kuri iepriek\u0161 ir pie\u013c\u0101vu\u0161i b\u016btiskus p\u0101rk\u0101pumus, past\u0101v augst\u0101ks atk\u0101rtotu p\u0101rk\u0101pumu izdar\u012b\u0161anas vai iepirkuma l\u012bguma neizpildes risks. No otras puses, \u0161\u0101du pretendentu izsl\u0113g\u0161anai no dal\u012bbas iepirkuma proced\u016br\u0101s teor\u0113tiski var b\u016bt ar\u012b sodo\u0161a funkcija, lai, piem\u0113ram, nepie\u013cautu t\u0101du pretendentu dal\u012bbu iepirkuma proced\u016br\u0101, kas savu iepriek\u0161 veikto prettiesisko darb\u012bbu rezult\u0101t\u0101 var b\u016bt guvu\u0161i nepamatotas priek\u0161roc\u012bbas, t\u0101d\u0113j\u0101di krop\u013cojot ieinteres\u0113to pieg\u0101d\u0101t\u0101ju br\u012bvu konkurenci.<\/p>\n Ta\u010du vienlaikus j\u0101atz\u012bm\u0113, ka viens no ES deklar\u0113tajiem pamatprincipiem publisko iepirkumu jom\u0101 ir efekt\u012bvas konkurences veicin\u0101\u0161ana, cita starp\u0101 nodro\u0161inot p\u0113c iesp\u0113jas pla\u0161\u0101ka pretendentu loka dal\u012bbas iesp\u0113jas publiskajos iepirkumos (skat\u012bt, piem\u0113ram, EST spriedumu Assitur liet\u0101 C-538\/07). No pla\u0161\u0101ka pretendentu loka dal\u012bbas iepirkumu proced\u016br\u0101s ieguv\u0113ji ir gan pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101ji, gan sabiedr\u012bba kopum\u0101, jo pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101jiem ir pla\u0161\u0101kas iesp\u0113jas izv\u0113l\u0113ties visizdev\u012bg\u0101ko pied\u0101v\u0101jumu par iesp\u0113jami zem\u0101ko cenu, t\u0101d\u0113j\u0101di ietaupot ar\u012b nodok\u013cu maks\u0101t\u0101ju l\u012bdzek\u013cus. <\/p>\n L\u012bdz ar to, pie\u0146emot jauno Direkt\u012bvu 2014\/24\/ES, ES likumdev\u0113js ir izv\u0113l\u0113jies dot iesp\u0113ju publiskajos iepirkumos piedal\u012bties ar\u012b tiem pretendentiem, kuriem iepriek\u0161 \u0161\u0101das ties\u012bbas bija liegtas, ar nosac\u012bjumu, ja tie sp\u0113j pier\u0101d\u012bt, ka ir veiku\u0161i nepiecie\u0161amos pas\u0101kumus, lai atjaunotu savu uzticam\u012bbu un nov\u0113rstu t\u0101du pa\u0161u vai l\u012bdz\u012bgu gad\u012bjumu atk\u0101rto\u0161anos n\u0101kotn\u0113.<\/p>\n Kad past\u0101v pamats uzskat\u012bt, ka ir atjaunota pretendenta uzticam\u012bba? <\/font><\/strong><\/p>\n Direkt\u012bvas 2014\/24\/ES 57. panta sestaj\u0101 da\u013c\u0101 noteikts, ka ikviens pretendents, kas non\u0101cis k\u0101d\u0101 no situ\u0101cij\u0101m, kur\u0101s past\u0101v pamats t\u0101 izsl\u0113g\u0161anai no turpm\u0101kas dal\u012bbas iepirkuma proced\u016br\u0101, ir ties\u012bgs iesniegt pier\u0101d\u012bjumus par to, ka \u0161\u0101 pretendenta veiktie pas\u0101kumi ir pietiekami, lai pier\u0101d\u012btu savu uzticam\u012bbu, neraugoties uz to, ka past\u0101v attiec\u012bgs izsl\u0113g\u0161anas pamats. \u0160aj\u0101 zi\u0146\u0101 Publisko iepirkumu likuma 39.3 pant\u0101 paredz\u0113tais regul\u0113jums ir l\u012bdz\u012bgs, ta\u010du papildus tiek paredz\u0113ts, ka kandid\u0101tam, pretendentam vai person\u0101lsabiedr\u012bbas biedram \u0161\u0101ds skaidrojums un pier\u0101d\u012bjumi ir j\u0101iesniedz uzreiz kop\u0101 ar pieteikumu vai pied\u0101v\u0101jumu. <\/p>\n Rodas jaut\u0101jums \u2013 k\u0101dos apst\u0101k\u013cos b\u016btu pamats uzskat\u012bt, ka ir atjaunota pretendenta uzticam\u012bba un t\u0101d\u0113j\u0101di pretendents nav izsl\u0113dzams no dal\u012bbas iepirkum\u0101? Gan Direkt\u012bva 2014\/24\/ES, gan Publisko iepirkumu likuma 39.3 pants paredz tr\u012bs veidu pier\u0101d\u012bjumus: <\/p>\n Tas, k\u0101das pretendenta veikt\u0101s “pa\u0161att\u012br\u012b\u0161an\u0101s” darb\u012bbas b\u016btu atz\u012bstamas par atbilsto\u0161\u0101m, ir atkar\u012bgs no konkr\u0113t\u0101 p\u0101rk\u0101puma rakstura un smaguma, k\u0101 ar\u012b \u2013 pa\u0161a p\u0101rk\u0101p\u0113ja saimniecisk\u0101s darb\u012bbas apm\u0113ra, apgroz\u012bjuma, tirgus da\u013cas, k\u0101 ar\u012b citiem konkr\u0113t\u0101 gad\u012bjuma apst\u0101k\u013ciem. Piem\u0113ram, maz\u0101k noz\u012bm\u012bgu p\u0101rk\u0101pumu gad\u012bjum\u0101 var pietikt ar uz\u0146\u0113muma iek\u0161\u0113jo atbilst\u012bbas sist\u0113mu uzlabo\u0161anu, efekt\u012bvu zi\u0146o\u0161anas kan\u0101lu izveidi, darbinieku apm\u0101c\u012bb\u0101m u.tml. Turpret\u012b noz\u012bm\u012bg\u0101ku p\u0101rk\u0101pumu gad\u012bjumos vai tad, ja p\u0101rk\u0101pumu rezult\u0101t\u0101 uz\u0146\u0113mums guvis noz\u012bm\u012bgus labumus, visticam\u0101k, var b\u016bt nepiecie\u0161ama ar\u012b \u0101r\u0113jo uzraugo\u0161o instit\u016bciju piesaist\u012b\u0161ana, uz\u0146\u0113muma vad\u012bbas komandas nomai\u0146a u.c.<\/p>\n To, vai uz\u0146\u0113muma veiktie uztic\u012bbas atjauno\u0161anas pas\u0101kumi ir atz\u012bstami par atbilsto\u0161iem, izlemj pats pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101js, izv\u0113rt\u0113jot pretendenta iesniegto skaidrojumu un pier\u0101d\u012bjumus. Pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101jam ir ties\u012bbas l\u016bgt pretendentu izskaidrot iesniegtos pier\u0101d\u012bjumus un preciz\u0113t, k\u0101 ar\u012b pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101jam ir ties\u012bbas pras\u012bt attiec\u012bg\u0101 noziedz\u012bg\u0101 nodar\u012bjuma vai p\u0101rk\u0101puma jomas kompetentaj\u0101m instit\u016bcij\u0101m (piem\u0113ram, Konkurences padomei, Korupcijas nov\u0113r\u0161anas un apkaro\u0161anas birojam u.c.) atzinumus par pretendenta veikto pas\u0101kumu pietiekam\u012bbu uztic\u012bbas atjauno\u0161anai un t\u0101du pa\u0161u vai l\u012bdz\u012bgu gad\u012bjumu nov\u0113r\u0161anu n\u0101kotn\u0113. Ta\u010du gad\u012bjum\u0101, ja pats pretendents jau s\u0101kotn\u0113ji, iesniedzot pied\u0101v\u0101jumu, nav sniedzis pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101jam nek\u0101du skaidrojumu un pier\u0101d\u012bjumus, tad pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101jam ir pien\u0101kums izsl\u0113gt attiec\u012bgo pretendentu no dal\u012bbas iepirkuma proced\u016br\u0101 k\u0101 atbilsto\u0161u Publisko iepirkumu likuma 39.1\u00a0panta pirm\u0101s da\u013cas 1., 2., 3., 4., 6. vai 7. punkt\u0101 min\u0113tajam izsl\u0113g\u0161anas gad\u012bjumam.<\/p>\n Visbeidzot j\u0101atz\u012bm\u0113, ka, veicot \u0161\u0101du “uztic\u012bbas atjauno\u0161anas” p\u0101rbaudi, pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101jam alla\u017e j\u0101iev\u0113ro vienl\u012bdz\u012bgas attieksmes un sam\u0113r\u012bguma principi. T\u0101, piem\u0113ram, gad\u012bjumos, kad pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101js secina, ka attiec\u012bgie pretendenta \u012bstenotie “pa\u0161att\u012br\u012b\u0161an\u0101s” pas\u0101kumi nav pietiekami, lai pie\u013cautu t\u0101 dal\u012bbu konkr\u0113taj\u0101 iepirkuma proced\u016br\u0101, pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101jam vienlaikus past\u0101v ties\u012bbas samazin\u0101t attiec\u012bg\u0101 pretendenta izsl\u0113g\u0161anas periodu, t\u0101d\u0113j\u0101di sekm\u0113jot t\u0101 ties\u012bbas piedal\u012bties k\u0101d\u0101 no turpm\u0101kajiem konkr\u0113t\u0101 pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101ja r\u012bkotajiem iepirkumiem. <\/p>\n Vienlaikus gan j\u0101nor\u0101da, ka apst\u0101klis, ka k\u0101ds cits pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101js iepriek\u0161 ir atjaunojis konkr\u0113t\u0101 pretendenta uzticam\u012bbu, nedod ties\u012bbas \u0161im pretendentam uz to pa\u013cauties cit\u0101s iepirkuma proced\u016br\u0101s pie citiem pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101jiem, jo katrs pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101js ikreiz atsevi\u0161\u0137i v\u0113rt\u0113 pretendenta iesniegtos pier\u0101d\u012bjumus un lemj par t\u0101 dal\u012bbu iepirkuma proced\u016br\u0101. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Pamatojums t\u0101du pretendentu izsl\u0113g\u0161anai no dal\u012bbas iepirkuma proced\u016br\u0101, kuri agr\u0101k ir pie\u013c\u0101vu\u0161i b\u016btiskus p\u0101rk\u0101pumus, ir div\u0113j\u0101ds. No vienas puses, tai ir prevent\u012bva noz\u012bme, lai nodro\u0161in\u0101tu, ka iepirkuma proced\u016br\u0101 nepiedal\u0101s \u201cuztic\u012bbu\u201d zaud\u0113ju\u0161ie pretendenti, t\u0101dej\u0101di vienlaikus samazinot pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101ja iesp\u0113jamo zaud\u0113jumu risku konkr\u0113t\u0101s iepirkuma proced\u016bras ietvaros. Nav \u0161aubu, ka \u0161\u0101diem pretendentiem, kuri iepriek\u0161 ir pie\u013c\u0101vu\u0161i b\u016btiskus p\u0101rk\u0101pumus, past\u0101v augst\u0101ks atk\u0101rtotu p\u0101rk\u0101pumu izdar\u012b\u0161anas vai iepirkuma l\u012bguma neizpildes risks.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6792"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=6792"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6792\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6793,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6792\/revisions\/6793"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=6792"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=6792"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=6792"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\n
\nPapildus tam Publisko iepirkumu likuma 39.1 panta pirm\u0101s da\u013cas 2., 3., 4., 6. un 7. punkt\u0101 noteikts, ka dal\u012bba iepirkuma proced\u016br\u0101 ir liedzama ar\u012b t\u0101diem kandid\u0101tiem un pretendentiem, kuri pa\u0161i vai ar to saist\u012bt\u0101s personas (a) ir veiku\u0161as personu neleg\u0101lu nodarbin\u0101\u0161anu vai nodarbin\u0101\u0161anu bez rakstveid\u0101 nosl\u0113gta darba l\u012bguma, (b) ir atz\u012btas par vain\u012bg\u0101m konkurences ties\u012bbu p\u0101rk\u0101pum\u0101, (c) ir pasludin\u0101tas par maks\u0101tnesp\u0113j\u012bg\u0101m vai kuru saimniecisk\u0101 darb\u012bba ir aptur\u0113ta, (d) atrodas intere\u0161u konflikta st\u0101vokl\u012b, kas nevar tikt nov\u0113rsts ar maz\u0101k ierobe\u017eojo\u0161iem pas\u0101kumiem, vai (e) t\u0101m ir konkurenci ierobe\u017eojo\u0161as priek\u0161roc\u012bbas iepirkuma proced\u016br\u0101 sakar\u0101 ar to iepriek\u0161\u0113ju iesaisti iepirkuma proced\u016bras dokument\u0101cijas sagatavo\u0161an\u0101, kas ar\u012b nevar tikt nov\u0113rstas ar maz\u0101k ierobe\u017eojo\u0161iem pas\u0101kumiem.<\/p>\n\n