{"id":4909,"date":"2014-12-02T15:42:02","date_gmt":"2014-12-02T13:42:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/?p=4909"},"modified":"2014-12-05T15:53:37","modified_gmt":"2014-12-05T13:53:37","slug":"ekspertu-kluba-degpunkta-nepamatoti-lets-piedavajums","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/?p=4909","title":{"rendered":"Ekspertu kluba degpunkt\u0101 – nepamatoti l\u0113ts pied\u0101v\u0101jums"},"content":{"rendered":"

Tie, kas kaut nedaudz sask\u0101ru\u0161ies ar publisko iepirkumu, noteikti atpaz\u012bst ar\u012b j\u0113dzienu \u201cnepamatoti l\u0113ts pied\u0101v\u0101jums\u201d. Ko tas noz\u012bm\u0113, un k\u0101das darb\u012bbas ir iesp\u0113jamas, lai saprastu, kura pus\u0113 ir taisn\u012bba \u2013 organiz\u0113t\u0101ja jeb pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101ja vai pretendenta jeb pieg\u0101d\u0101t\u0101ja? K\u0101da ir nepamatoti l\u0113ta pied\u0101v\u0101juma kontekst\u0101 izveidojusies Iepirkumu uzraudz\u012bbas biroja iesniegumu izskat\u012b\u0161anas komisijas un l\u012bdz ar to pak\u0101rtoti ar\u012b tiesu prakse? Par \u0161iem un citiem jaut\u0101jumiem pirmaj\u0101 \u201cIepirkumu\u201d ekspertu kluba semin\u0101r\u0101 diskut\u0113ja ekspertu kluba dal\u012bbnieki un Iepirkumu uzraudz\u012bbas biroja (IUB) speci\u0101listi.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Noteikta r\u012bc\u012bba<\/span><\/font><\/strong><\/p>\n

Publisko iepirkumu proced\u016bru regul\u0113jo\u0161ie normat\u012bvie akti paredz noteiktu r\u012bc\u012bbu iepirkuma organiz\u0113t\u0101jam jeb pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101jam gad\u012bjumos, kad tas pied\u0101v\u0101jumu uzskata par nepamatoti l\u0113tu. Saska\u0146\u0101 ar Publisko iepirkumu likuma (PIL) 48. pantu patlaban, ja pied\u0101v\u0101jums konkr\u0113tam publiskam b\u016bvdarbu, pieg\u0101des vai pakalpojumu l\u012bgumam ir nepamatoti l\u0113ts, pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101js pirms \u0161\u0101 pied\u0101v\u0101juma iesp\u0113jam\u0101s noraid\u012b\u0161anas rakstveid\u0101 pieprasa detaliz\u0113tu paskaidrojumu par b\u016btiskajiem pied\u0101v\u0101juma nosac\u012bjumiem. IUB Juridisk\u0101 departamenta direktora vietniece Monta Oga uzsver, ka \u0161is detaliz\u0113tais paskaidrojums \u012bpa\u0161i var attiekties uz ra\u017eo\u0161anas procesa, b\u016bvdarbu metodes vai sniedzamo pakalpojumu izmaks\u0101m; izraudz\u012btajiem tehniskajiem risin\u0101jumiem un \u012bpa\u0161i izdev\u012bgajiem b\u016bvdarbu veik\u0161anas, pre\u010du pieg\u0101des vai pakalpojumu snieg\u0161anas apst\u0101k\u013ciem, kas ir pieejami pretendentam; pied\u0101v\u0101to b\u016bvdarbu, pre\u010du vai pakalpojumu \u012bpa\u0161\u012bb\u0101m un ori\u0123inalit\u0101ti; darba aizsardz\u012bbas noteikumu un darba apst\u0101k\u013cu atbilst\u012bbu vietai, kur tiek veikti b\u016bvdarbi, pieg\u0101d\u0101tas preces vai sniegti pakalpojumi, un pretendenta iesp\u0113j\u0101m sa\u0146emt komercdarb\u012bbas atbalstu. Pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101js, konsult\u0113joties ar pretendentu, izv\u0113rt\u0113 visus \u0161\u0101 panta otraj\u0101 da\u013c\u0101 min\u0113tos nosac\u012bjumus un tad, ja konstat\u0113, ka pied\u0101v\u0101jums ir nepamatoti l\u0113ts t\u0101p\u0113c, ka pretendents sa\u0146\u0113mis valsts atbalstu, pied\u0101v\u0101jumu var noraid\u012bt, tikai pamatojoties uz to, ka pretendents nevar pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101ja noteikt\u0101 sapr\u0101t\u012bg\u0101 termi\u0146\u0101 pier\u0101d\u012bt, ka sa\u0146emtais komercdarb\u012bbas atbalsts ir likum\u012bgs. Ja pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101js noraida pied\u0101v\u0101jumu \u0161\u0101 iemesla d\u0113\u013c, tas inform\u0113 EK un Iepirkumu uzraudz\u012bbas biroju par pied\u0101v\u0101juma noraid\u012b\u0161anu un noraid\u012b\u0161anas iemeslu. T\u0101pat iepirkumu proced\u016bru regul\u0113 Sabiedrisko pakalpojumu sniedz\u0113ju iepirkumu likuma 53. pants un Aizsardz\u012bbas un dro\u0161\u012bbas jomas iepirkumu likuma 50. pants. <\/p>\n


\nTas ir gandr\u012bz identisks regul\u0113jums PIL 48. pantam, bet \u0161o likumu regul\u0113jums, pirmk\u0101rt, paredz, ka sabiedrisko pakalpojumu sniedz\u0113js jeb pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101js noraida pretendenta pied\u0101v\u0101jumu, ja tas \u0161aj\u0101 pant\u0101 noteiktaj\u0101 k\u0101rt\u012bb\u0101 konstat\u0113, ka pretendenta pied\u0101v\u0101jums ir nepamatoti l\u0113ts. J\u0101piebilst, ka PIL \u0161\u0101du da\u013cu neparedz. Otrk\u0101rt, ja pied\u0101v\u0101jumu konkr\u0113tam b\u016bvdarbu, pieg\u0101des vai pakalpojumu l\u012bgumam sabiedrisko pakalpojumu sniedz\u0113js jeb pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101js uzskata par nepamatoti l\u0113tu, tas pirms \u0161\u0101 pied\u0101v\u0101juma iesp\u0113jam\u0101s noraid\u012b\u0161anas rakstveid\u0101 pieprasa no pretendenta detaliz\u0113tu paskaidrojumu par b\u016btiskiem pied\u0101v\u0101juma nosac\u012bjumiem. PIL noteikts: ja pied\u0101v\u0101jums ir nepamatoti l\u0113ts, pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101js pirms noraid\u012b\u0161anas rakstveid\u0101 pieprasa detaliz\u0113tu paskaidrojumu. Savuk\u0101rt Publisk\u0101s un priv\u0101t\u0101s partner\u012bbas likums attiec\u012bgu regul\u0113jumu neparedz. Lo\u0123isks ir jaut\u0101jums \u2013 k\u0101 ar t\u0101 saucamajiem B da\u013cas iepirkumiem? M. Oga skaidro, ka uz tiem likuma regul\u0113jums nav attiecin\u0101ms, bet gan izv\u0113rt\u0113jum\u0101 v\u0113r\u0101 \u0146emami no t\u0101 izrieto\u0161ie principi. Tiesa, pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101js iepirkuma dokument\u0101cij\u0101 nereti tie\u0161i nosaka, ka piem\u0113rojams attiec\u012bgais regul\u0113jums. Iesniegumu izskat\u012b\u0161anas komisijas (IIK) praks\u0113 atz\u012bts, ka Publisko iepirkumu likuma m\u0113r\u0137im atbilsto\u0161a b\u016btu t\u0101da pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101ja r\u012bc\u012bba, kad motiv\u0113tu \u0161aubu par pretendenta pied\u0101v\u0101t\u0101s l\u012bgumcenas pamatot\u012bbu gad\u012bjum\u0101 no attiec\u012bg\u0101 pretendenta tiktu piepras\u012bti detaliz\u0113ti paskaidrojumi par t\u0101 pied\u0101v\u0101t\u0101s l\u012bgumcenas pamatot\u012bbu un pie\u0146emts argument\u0113ts l\u0113mums par t\u0101 pied\u0101v\u0101t\u0101s cenas atz\u012b\u0161anu par pamatotu vai nepamatoti zemu. Attiec\u012bgi pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101js, veicot procesu\u0101l\u0101s darb\u012bbas nol\u016bk\u0101 noskaidrot pretendenta pied\u0101v\u0101t\u0101s l\u012bgumcenas pamatot\u012bbu, nav ierobe\u017eots izmantot no PIL 48. panta izrieto\u0161os principus. Bet Augst\u0101k\u0101s tiesas (AT) Administrat\u012bvo lietu departaments, v\u0113rt\u0113jot nepamatoti l\u0113ta pied\u0101v\u0101juma jaut\u0101jumu sakar\u0101 ar B da\u013cas iepirkumu, piem\u0113ro PIL 48. panta regul\u0113jumu. P\u0113c b\u016bt\u012bbas publisko iepirkumu regul\u0113jo\u0161o normat\u012bvo aktu nians\u0113tai at\u0161\u0137ir\u012bbai nav faktiskas noz\u012bmes. IIK un tiesu prakse, iev\u0113rojot publisko iepirkumu m\u0113r\u0137us, tiek piem\u0113rota p\u0113c analo\u0123ijas, skaidro M. Oga. Pie iepirkumu regul\u0113juma j\u0101min ar\u012b EP jaun\u0101s direkt\u012bvas. \u0160is regul\u0113jums p\u0113c b\u016bt\u012bbas neat\u0161\u0137iras, ta\u010du ir nianse: 3. punkts (PIL 48. panta tre\u0161\u0101 da\u013ca \u2013 par apsprie\u0161anos) \u2013 l\u012bgumsl\u0113dz\u0113ja iest\u0101de izv\u0113rt\u0113 sniegto inform\u0101ciju, apsprie\u017eoties ar pretendentu; t\u0101 var noraid\u012bt pied\u0101v\u0101jumu tikai tad, ja sniegtie pier\u0101d\u012bjumi apmierino\u0161i neizskaidro pied\u0101v\u0101t\u0101s cenas vai izmaksu zemo l\u012bmeni.<\/p>\n

Jauni labojumi<\/span><\/font><\/strong><\/p>\n

Jaunie labojumi PIL 48. pant\u0101 ir papildin\u0101ti ar jaunu redakciju. T\u0101 pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101jam ir pien\u0101kums izv\u0113rt\u0113t, vai pied\u0101v\u0101jums nav nepamatoti l\u0113ts, ja tas konstat\u0113, ka pretendenta vai t\u0101 pied\u0101v\u0101jum\u0101 nor\u0101d\u012bto apak\u0161uz\u0146\u0113m\u0113ju darba \u0146\u0113m\u0113ju vid\u0113j\u0101 stundas tarifa likme kaut vien\u0101 no profesiju grup\u0101m pirmajos trijos gada ceturk\u0161\u0146os p\u0113d\u0113jo \u010detru gada ceturk\u0161\u0146u period\u0101 l\u012bdz pied\u0101v\u0101juma iesnieg\u0161anas dienai ir maz\u0101ka par 80% vai nesasniedz valst\u012b noteikto minim\u0101lo stundas tarifa likmi no darba \u0146\u0113m\u0113ju vid\u0113j\u0101s stundas tarifa likmes attiec\u012bgaj\u0101 profesiju grup\u0101 valst\u012b min\u0113taj\u0101 period\u0101 p\u0113c VID apkopotajiem datiem, kas public\u0113ti VID dienesta m\u0101jaslap\u0101 internet\u0101. Ja pretendents k\u0101 nodok\u013cu maks\u0101t\u0101js ir re\u0123istr\u0113ts p\u0113d\u0113jo \u010detru gada ceturk\u0161\u0146u period\u0101 l\u012bdz pied\u0101v\u0101juma iesnieg\u0161anas dienai, \u0146em v\u0113r\u0101 darba \u0146\u0113m\u0113ju vid\u0113jo stundas tarifa likmi period\u0101 no n\u0101kam\u0101 m\u0113ne\u0161a p\u0113c re\u0123istr\u0101cijas m\u0113ne\u0161a l\u012bdz pied\u0101v\u0101juma iesnieg\u0161anas dienai. Pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101jam b\u016bs j\u0101pieprasa, lai pretendents kop\u0101 ar pied\u0101v\u0101jumu iesniedz izdrukas no VID elektronisk\u0101s deklar\u0113\u0161anas sist\u0113mas par pretendenta un t\u0101 pied\u0101v\u0101jum\u0101 nor\u0101d\u012bto apak\u0161uz\u0146\u0113m\u0113ju vid\u0113j\u0101m stundas tarifa likm\u0113m profesiju grup\u0101s. Savuk\u0101rt VID, veicot nodok\u013cu administr\u0113\u0161anas pas\u0101kumus, b\u016bs j\u0101p\u0101rbauda vid\u0113j\u0101s stundas tarifa likmes pamatot\u012bba un j\u0101sniedz atzinums pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101jam 15 dienu laik\u0101.<\/p>\n

Paredzams, ka jaunie labojumi st\u0101sies sp\u0113k\u0101 2015. gada 1. august\u0101. Ja iepirkums vai iepirkuma proced\u016bra ir izsludin\u0101ta pirms \u0161o labojumu sp\u0113k\u0101 st\u0101\u0161an\u0101s dienas, t\u0101 pabeidzama, taj\u0101 skait\u0101 apstr\u012bdama vai p\u0101rs\u016bdzama, saska\u0146\u0101 ar \u0161\u0101 likuma noteikumiem, kas bija sp\u0113k\u0101 attiec\u012bg\u0101 iepirkuma vai iepirkuma proced\u016bras izsludin\u0101\u0161anas dien\u0101. \u0160ie labojumi nepiecie\u0161ami, lai veicin\u0101tu nodok\u013cu maks\u0101\u0161anu uz valsts vai pa\u0161vald\u012bbu iepirkumiem pretend\u0113jo\u0161o uz\u0146\u0113m\u0113ju vid\u016b, lai visiem pretendentiem b\u016btu vienl\u012bdz\u012bgas poz\u012bcijas iepirkumos un nodok\u013cu nemaks\u0101t\u0101ji neg\u016btu priek\u0161roc\u012bbu attiec\u012bb\u0101 pret nodok\u013cu maks\u0101t\u0101jiem. Jaunajiem labojumiem ir divi galvenie iemesli \u2013 lai tiktu p\u0101rbaud\u012bti visi pretendenti un lai visi pretendenti b\u016btu motiv\u0113ti regul\u0101ri maks\u0101t nodok\u013cus. <\/b>T\u0101d\u0113j\u0101di pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101ji, p\u0101rbaudot visus pretendentus, jau kvalifik\u0101cijas stadij\u0101 izsl\u0113gtu no dal\u012bbas t\u0101l\u0101kaj\u0101 konkurs\u0101 nodok\u013cu nemaks\u0101t\u0101jus, jo pa\u0161reiz\u0113j\u0101 redakcija pie\u013cauj un veicina, ka pretendents nodok\u013cus samaks\u0101 tikai tad, ja tiek pasludin\u0101ts par uzvar\u0113t\u0101ju. Ja visi zin\u0101tu, ka tiks izsl\u0113gti no konkursa par nenomaks\u0101tiem nodok\u013ciem, tad t\u0101 b\u016btu motiv\u0101cija maks\u0101t. T\u0101pat ir nepiecie\u0161ams noteikt nodok\u013cu nomaksu iepirkuma izsludin\u0101\u0161anas dien\u0101 vai p\u0113d\u0113j\u0101 aktualiz\u0101cij\u0101 pirms \u0161\u012bs dienas. Patlaban likums pie\u013cauj par\u0101du esam\u012bbas gad\u012bjum\u0101 tos nomaks\u0101t tikai p\u0113c tam, ja iepirkumu komisija konstat\u0113 par\u0101du un ar konkr\u0113to pretendentu ir pl\u0101nots nosl\u0113gt l\u012bgumu, bet visi p\u0101r\u0113jie pretendenti var turpin\u0101t nemaks\u0101t nodok\u013cus, l\u012bdz izdosies uzvar\u0113t k\u0101d\u0101 konkurs\u0101, st\u0101sta Monta Oga.<\/p>\n

K\u0101 vienu no piem\u0113riem M. Oga min konkr\u0113tu gad\u012bjumu, skaidrojot, ka PIL 48. pants b\u016bt\u012bb\u0101 paredz autom\u0101tiski neatteikties no t\u0101diem pied\u0101v\u0101jumiem, kuri pirmaj\u0101 mirkl\u012b var \u0161\u0137ist nenopietni,
\njo tajos ir p\u0101r\u0101k zema pied\u0101v\u0101t\u0101 cena. Pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101jam pirms \u0161\u0101da l\u0113muma pie\u0146em\u0161anas ir j\u0101noskaidro, k\u0101 pied\u0101v\u0101t\u0101 cena tiek pamatota. Min\u0113tais atbilst publisk\u0101 iepirkuma j\u0113gai un m\u0113r\u0137im, proti,
\ngan br\u012bvai pretendentu konkurencei, gan pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101ja interes\u0113m par izdev\u012bg\u0101ko, tostarp l\u0113t\u0101ko pied\u0101v\u0101jumu. M\u0113r\u0137is nepamatoti l\u0113tu pied\u0101v\u0101jumu izv\u0113rt\u0113juma proced\u016brai un izsl\u0113g\u0161anai no konkursa
\nnav tirgus cenu regul\u0113\u0161ana. T\u0101ds neizriet no \u0161\u0101 likuma un publiskajam iepirkumam nepiem\u012bt. No PIL 48. panta pirm\u0101s da\u013cas izriet, ka vispirms ir j\u0101konstat\u0113, ka pied\u0101v\u0101jums ir nepamatoti l\u0113ts,
\ntikai p\u0113c tam pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101jam ir pien\u0101kums pras\u012bt paskaidrojumu pretendentam par pied\u0101v\u0101juma b\u016btiskajiem nosac\u012bjumiem. T\u0101tad pien\u0101kums p\u0101rbaud\u012bt pied\u0101v\u0101juma nopietn\u012bbu rodas, ja past\u0101v iepriek\u0161\u0113jas \u0161aubas par t\u0101 uzticam\u012bbu, un \u0161\u012b panta galvenais m\u0113r\u0137is ir \u013caut pretendentam izmantot \u0161o proced\u016bru, dodot iesp\u0113ju pamatot sava pied\u0101v\u0101juma l\u012bmeni, kas \u0161\u0137iet nepamatoti l\u0113ts. Bet gad\u012bjum\u0101, ja pied\u0101v\u0101jums ne\u0161\u0137iet nepamatoti l\u0113ts, 48. panta noteikumi nav piem\u0113rojami. PIL 48. pants nav paredz\u0113ts k\u0101 proced\u016bra, lai test\u0113tu, vai pied\u0101v\u0101jums nav nepamatoti l\u0113ts. Pret\u0113j\u0101
\ngad\u012bjum\u0101 pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101jam vajadz\u0113tu test\u0113t visu pretendentu pied\u0101v\u0101jumus, prasot sniegt paskaidrojumus par pied\u0101v\u0101juma b\u016btiskajiem nosac\u012bjumiem. M. Oga skaidro, ka katr\u0101 konkr\u0113t\u0101 gad\u012bjum\u0101 pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101jam ir j\u0101piepilda ar saturu j\u0113dziens \u201cnepamatoti l\u0113ts pied\u0101v\u0101jums\u201d. Nosac\u012bjums min\u0113t\u0101s normas piem\u0113ro\u0161anai jeb paskaidrojumu piepras\u012b\u0161anai ir tas, ka pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101jam radu\u0161\u0101s \u0161aubas par pied\u0101v\u0101juma nopietn\u012bbu t\u0101 cenas d\u0113\u013c. Min\u0113to normu galvenais m\u0113r\u0137is ir dot pretendentiem iesp\u0113ju pamatot sava pied\u0101v\u0101juma cenu, kas \u0161\u0137iet nepamatoti zema. Eksperte skaidro, ka nepamatoti l\u0113ta pied\u0101v\u0101juma p\u0101rbaudes proced\u016bra ir oblig\u0101ti nepiecie\u0161ama, lai publisk\u0101 iepirkuma l\u012bguma sl\u0113g\u0161an\u0101 pan\u0101ktu re\u0101lu konkurenci.<\/p>\n

Tr\u016bkst krit\u0113riju<\/span><\/font><\/strong><\/p>\n

M. Oga ar\u012b uzsver, ka publisko iepirkumu regul\u0113jo\u0161ajos normat\u012bvajos aktos nepamatoti l\u0113ta pied\u0101v\u0101juma j\u0113dziens nav ietverts<\/b>. T\u0101pat \u0161ajos aktos nav ietverti krit\u0113riji, p\u0113c kuriem var\u0113tu konstat\u0113t, ka pied\u0101v\u0101jums ir nepamatoti l\u0113ts. Nepamatoti l\u0113ta pied\u0101v\u0101juma paz\u012bmes jeb apst\u0101k\u013ci, kas liecina par to, ka pied\u0101v\u0101jums ir nepamatoti l\u0113ts, izriet no IIK un tiesu prakses. Kas var liecin\u0101t, ka pied\u0101v\u0101jums ir nepamatoti l\u0113ts vai kad ir pamats iedarbin\u0101t \u201cnepamatoti l\u0113ta pied\u0101v\u0101juma p\u0101rbaudes meh\u0101nismu\u201d? Eksperte nor\u0101da, ka pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101jam pamatotu aizdomu gad\u012bjum\u0101 ir j\u0101izv\u0113rt\u0113 pretendentu pied\u0101v\u0101to l\u012bgumcenu pamatot\u012bba un j\u0101izsl\u0113dz no dal\u012bbas proced\u016br\u0101 tie pretendenti, kuru iesniegtie pied\u0101v\u0101jumi ir nepamatoti l\u0113ti. Princip\u0101 nepamatoti l\u0113ta pied\u0101v\u0101juma identific\u0113\u0161anai var tikt izmantoti matem\u0101tiski krit\u0113riji, piem\u0113ram, pied\u0101v\u0101t\u0101s cenas at\u0161\u0137ir\u012bba sal\u012bdzin\u0101jum\u0101 ar visu iesniegto pied\u0101v\u0101jumu vid\u0113jo cenu, ta\u010du tas nevar b\u016bt pietiekams pamats pretendenta autom\u0101tiskai izsl\u0113g\u0161anai no proced\u016bras. Pied\u0101v\u0101t\u0101s cenas iev\u0113rojama at\u0161\u0137ir\u012bba no citu pretendentu pied\u0101v\u0101taj\u0101m cen\u0101m ir pietiekams pamats \u0161aub\u0101m par to, vai pied\u0101v\u0101t\u0101 cena ir pamatota un vai l\u012bdz ar to pretendents sp\u0113s par \u0161o cenu \u012bstenot iepirkuma l\u012bgumu.<\/p>\n


\nTa\u010du pretendentu pied\u0101v\u0101to cenu at\u0161\u0137ir\u012bba pati par sevi nevar b\u016bt iemesls, lai pied\u0101v\u0101jumu atz\u012btu par nepamatoti l\u0113tu, jo nepamatoti l\u0113ts ir vien\u012bgi t\u0101ds pied\u0101v\u0101jums, par kur\u0101 nor\u0101d\u012bto
\ncenu visp\u0101r nav iesp\u0113jams izpild\u012bt iepirkuma l\u012bguma nosac\u012bjumus<\/b>. L\u012bdz ar to var secin\u0101t, ka cenas at\u0161\u0137ir\u012bba pati par sevi nav pamats, lai pied\u0101v\u0101jumu atz\u012btu par nepamatoti l\u0113tu, bet at\u0161\u0137ir\u012bba ir paz\u012bme, kas liecina, ka ir pamats \u201ciedarbin\u0101t nepamatoti l\u0113ta pied\u0101v\u0101juma p\u0101rbaudes meh\u0101nismu\u201d.<\/p>\n

Pirmaj\u0101 ekspertu kluba semin\u0101r\u0101 IUB Administrat\u012bvo sodu departamenta direktore Arita \u016adre analiz\u0113ja Publisko iepirkumu likum\u0101 ietvertos izsl\u0113g\u0161anas noteikumus un to piem\u0113ro\u0161anas praksi,
\nk\u0101 ar\u012b sniedza ieskatu jaunajos labojumos, kas attiecin\u0101mi uz izsl\u0113g\u0161anas noteikumu piem\u0113ro\u0161anu. Paredz\u0113ts, ka \u201cIepirkumu\u201d ekspertu kluba semin\u0101ri turpm\u0101k notiks regul\u0101ri.<\/p>\n

AUTORS: Elza B\u0113rzi\u0146a
\nFoto: GATIS DIEZI\u0145\u0160<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Tie, kas kaut nedaudz sask\u0101ru\u0161ies ar publisko iepirkumu, noteikti atpaz\u012bst ar\u012b j\u0113dzienu \u201cnepamatoti l\u0113ts pied\u0101v\u0101jums\u201d. Ko tas noz\u012bm\u0113, un k\u0101das darb\u012bbas ir iesp\u0113jamas, lai saprastu, kura pus\u0113 ir taisn\u012bba \u2013 organiz\u0113t\u0101ja jeb pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101ja vai pretendenta jeb pieg\u0101d\u0101t\u0101ja? K\u0101da ir nepamatoti l\u0113ta pied\u0101v\u0101juma kontekst\u0101 izveidojusies Iepirkumu uzraudz\u012bbas biroja iesniegumu izskat\u012b\u0161anas komisijas un l\u012bdz ar to pak\u0101rtoti ar\u012b tiesu prakse? Par \u0161iem un citiem jaut\u0101jumiem pirmaj\u0101 \u201cIepirkumu\u201d ekspertu kluba semin\u0101r\u0101 diskut\u0113ja ekspertu kluba dal\u012bbnieki un Iepirkumu uzraudz\u012bbas biroja (IUB) speci\u0101listi.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4909"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=4909"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4909\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5185,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4909\/revisions\/5185"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=4909"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=4909"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=4909"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}