Sen\u0101ta Administrat\u012bvo lietu departaments ir aptur\u0113jis tiesved\u012bbu liet\u0101 par Iepirkumu uzraudz\u012bbas biroja l\u0113muma atcel\u0161anu un uzdevis Eiropas Savien\u012bbas Tiesai (EST) tr\u012bs prejudici\u0101los jaut\u0101jumus par ekonomikas dal\u012bbnieka izsl\u0113g\u0161anu no publisk\u0101 iepirkuma proced\u016bras. Tiesved\u012bba liet\u0101 ir aptur\u0113ta, l\u012bdz st\u0101sies sp\u0113k\u0101 Eiropas Savien\u012bbas Tiesas nol\u0113mums<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Pieteic\u0113ja liet\u0101 ir komercsabiedr\u012bba, kas bija iesniegusi pied\u0101v\u0101jumu pa\u0161vald\u012bbas r\u012bkot\u0101 konkurs\u0101 par transportl\u012bdzek\u013cu nomu. T\u0101 k\u0101 Konkurences padome bija iepriek\u0161 sod\u012bjusi pieteic\u0113ju par horizont\u0101lu karte\u013ca vieno\u0161anos un pieteic\u0113ja nebija p\u0101rliecin\u0101jusi konkursa r\u012bkot\u0101ju par savu uzticam\u012bbu, pieteic\u0113ja tika izsl\u0113gta no dal\u012bbas iepirkum\u0101. Iepirkumu uzraudz\u012bbas birojs atst\u0101ja \u0161o l\u0113mumu sp\u0113k\u0101 un at\u013c\u0101va pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101jam sl\u0113gt vieno\u0161anos ar konkursa uzvar\u0113t\u0101jiem.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Administrat\u012bv\u0101 rajona tiesa noraid\u012bja pieteikumu par Iepirkumu uzraudz\u012bbas biroja l\u0113muma atcel\u0161anu, nor\u0101dot, ka kompetentas iest\u0101des l\u0113mums par p\u0101rk\u0101puma konstat\u0113\u0161anu ir uzskat\u0101ms par Publisko iepirkumu likum\u0101 paredz\u0113to \u201cp\u0101rliecino\u0161o nor\u0101di\u201d par pretendenta prettiesisku vieno\u0161anos ar citiem pieg\u0101d\u0101t\u0101jiem, kas ir viens no oblig\u0101tajiem pamatiem izsl\u0113gt pretendentu no dal\u012bbas iepirkum\u0101, ja tas nav likum\u0101 noteiktaj\u0101 k\u0101rt\u012bb\u0101 atjaunojis uzticam\u012bbu. Tiesas ieskat\u0101, \u0161aj\u0101 sakar\u0101 nav noz\u012bmes tam, ka attiec\u012bgais Konkurences padomes l\u0113mums ir ticis p\u0101rs\u016bdz\u0113ts un v\u0113l nav st\u0101jies sp\u0113k\u0101.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Izskatot pieteic\u0113jas kas\u0101cijas s\u016bdz\u012bbu, Sen\u0101ts atzina, ka lietas pareizai izsprie\u0161anai nepiecie\u0161ams noskaidrot, vai liet\u0101 piem\u0113rot\u0101s Latvijas ties\u012bbu normas ir sader\u012bgas ar Eiropas Savien\u012bbas ties\u012bb\u0101m. Saska\u0146\u0101 ar EST atzi\u0146\u0101m, l\u012bgumsl\u0113dz\u0113jai iest\u0101dei ir br\u012bv\u012bba patst\u0101v\u012bgi veikt nov\u0113rt\u0113jumu jaut\u0101jumos par pretendentu god\u012bgumu un uzticam\u012bbu un pien\u0101kums pamatot savu l\u0113mumu, ta\u010du ir \u0161aubas, vai l\u012bgumsl\u0113dz\u0113ja iest\u0101de apst\u0101k\u013cos, kad ir p\u0101rs\u016bdz\u0113ts konkurences iest\u0101des l\u0113mums, pati var neveikt p\u0101rbaudi par iesp\u0113jam\u0101 konkurences ties\u012bbu p\u0101rk\u0101puma es\u012bbu. L\u012bdz ar to ir nepiecie\u0161ams sa\u0146emt EST skaidrojumu par to, vai l\u012bgumsl\u0113dz\u0113ja iest\u0101de var lemt par pretendenta izsl\u0113g\u0161anu no dal\u012bbas iepirkum\u0101 t\u0101d\u0113\u013c, ka konkurences iest\u0101de pie\u0146\u0113musi l\u0113mumu, par kura tiesiskumu past\u0101v str\u012bds ties\u0101. T\u0101pat past\u0101v \u0161aubas par to, vai Eiropas Savien\u012bbas ties\u012bbu norm\u0101m par maksim\u0101lo izsl\u0113g\u0161anas laikposmu atbilst regul\u0113jums, saska\u0146\u0101 ar kuru pretendents var tikt izsl\u0113gts no publisko iepirkumu proced\u016br\u0101m tr\u012bs gadus no t\u0101da konkurences iest\u0101des l\u0113muma pie\u0146em\u0161anas, ar kuru konstat\u0113ts pretendenta pie\u013cauts konkurences ties\u012bbu p\u0101rk\u0101pums, bet p\u0113c tam \u2013 tr\u012bs gadus no \u0161\u0101da konkurences iest\u0101des l\u0113muma gal\u012bgas sp\u0113k\u0101 st\u0101\u0161an\u0101s. Turkl\u0101t liet\u0101, iesp\u0113jams, ir skartas pretendenta pamatties\u012bbas. Pirmk\u0101rt, noz\u012bme ir personas ties\u012bb\u0101m uz tiesu. Ja l\u012bgumsl\u0113dz\u0113ja iest\u0101de un attiec\u012bgi ar\u012b tiesa pati nep\u0101rbauda konkurences ties\u012bbu p\u0101rk\u0101puma es\u012bbu, ir \u0161aubas, vai tiesa t\u0101d\u0101 gad\u012bjum\u0101 ir pilnas jurisdikcijas tiesa. Savuk\u0101rt tas, ka l\u012bgumsl\u0113dz\u0113ja iest\u0101de uzticam\u012bbas atjauno\u0161anu ir sasaist\u012bjusi ar Konkurences padomes l\u0113muma nep\u0101rs\u016bdz\u0113\u0161anu ties\u0101 un labpr\u0101t\u012bgu izpildi, proti, p\u0101rk\u0101puma atz\u012b\u0161anu un naudas soda samaksu, rada \u0161aubas, vai tiek respekt\u0113tas pretendenta ties\u012bbas uz taisn\u012bgu tiesu. Otrk\u0101rt, t\u0101 k\u0101 Konkurences padomes piem\u0113rotajiem sodiem piem\u012bt krimin\u0101ltiesisks raksturs, rodas jaut\u0101jums par nevain\u012bguma prezumpcijas iev\u0113ro\u0161anu, jo l\u012bgumsl\u0113dz\u0113ja iest\u0101de var balst\u012bt savu l\u0113mumu uz pie\u0146\u0113mumu par konkurences ties\u012bbu p\u0101rk\u0101puma izdar\u012b\u0161anas faktu, kam\u0113r par to v\u0113l turpin\u0101s tiesved\u012bba.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Sen\u0101ta Administrat\u012bvo lietu departaments ir aptur\u0113jis tiesved\u012bbu liet\u0101 par Iepirkumu uzraudz\u012bbas biroja l\u0113muma atcel\u0161anu un uzdevis Eiropas Savien\u012bbas Tiesai (EST) tr\u012bs prejudici\u0101los jaut\u0101jumus par ekonomikas dal\u012bbnieka izsl\u0113g\u0161anu no publisk\u0101 iepirkuma proced\u016bras.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1938,"featured_media":27240,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[120,174,115,71,43,46],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27241"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1938"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=27241"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27241\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":27242,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27241\/revisions\/27242"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/27240"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=27241"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=27241"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=27241"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}