Iepirkumu uzraudz\u012bbas birojs (IUB) aizliedzis VAS “Valsts nekustamie \u012bpa\u0161umi” (VN\u012a) sl\u0113gt l\u012bgumu konkurs\u0101 par Paula Stradi\u0146a Kl\u012bnisk\u0101s universit\u0101tes slimn\u012bcas (PSKUS) A2 korpusa b\u016bvniec\u012bbas pabeig\u0161anu.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
IUB l\u0113mums pie\u0146emts, izskatot SIA “Aimasa” iesniegto s\u016bdz\u012bbu par VN\u012a r\u012bkot\u0101 konkursa rezult\u0101tiem. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
VN\u012a iepirkum\u0101 par A2 korpusa pabeig\u0161anas b\u016bvniec\u012bbas ieceres dokument\u0101cijas izstr\u0101di, b\u016bvdarbiem un autoruzraudz\u012bbu uzvar\u0113ja pieg\u0101d\u0101t\u0101ju apvien\u012bbu “NSHC Group”, kuras sast\u0101v\u0101 ir SIA “Hanza Construction Group” un SIA “Baltic Construction Company”. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
“Aimasa” s\u016bdz\u012bb\u0101 apstr\u012bd\u0113ja konkursa rezult\u0101tus, uzskatot, ka uzvar\u0113t\u0101js nepamatoti atz\u012bts par atbilsto\u0161u vair\u0101k\u0101m kvalifik\u0101cijas pras\u012bb\u0101m, ka pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101js nav pien\u0101c\u012bgi p\u0101rbaud\u012bjis uzvar\u0113t\u0101ja l\u012bgumcenu, k\u0101 ar\u012b to, ka gan uzvar\u0113t\u0101jam, gan pa\u0161ai “Aimasai” atsevi\u0161\u0137os saimnieciski visizdev\u012bg\u0101k\u0101 pied\u0101v\u0101juma v\u0113rt\u0113\u0161anas krit\u0113rijos pie\u0161\u0137irts nepamatots v\u0113rt\u0113jums.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
IUB atc\u0113lis VN\u012a iepirkuma komisijas l\u0113mumu par konkursa rezult\u0101tiem, aizliedzis VN\u012a sl\u0113gt iepirkuma l\u012bgumu ar “NSHC Group” un uzdevis 30 darbdienu laik\u0101 nov\u0113rst IUB konstat\u0113tos p\u0101rk\u0101pumus, atk\u0101rtoti izv\u0113rt\u0113jot konkurs\u0101 iesniegtos pied\u0101v\u0101jumus, un pie\u0146emt jaunu l\u0113mumu. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
No IUB l\u0113muma izriet, ka par pamatotu atz\u012bta “Aimasa” s\u016bdz\u012bbas da\u013ca, kas saist\u012bta ar konkursa uzvar\u0113t\u0101ja finan\u0161u pied\u0101v\u0101juma v\u0113rt\u0113\u0161anu.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
IUB atc\u0113lis VN\u012a iepirkuma komisijas l\u0113mumu par konkursa rezult\u0101tiem, aizliedzis VN\u012a sl\u0113gt iepirkuma l\u012bgumu ar “NSHC Group” un uzdevis 30 darbdienu laik\u0101 nov\u0113rst IUB konstat\u0113tos p\u0101rk\u0101pumus, atk\u0101rtoti izv\u0113rt\u0113jot konkurs\u0101 iesniegtos pied\u0101v\u0101jumus, un pie\u0146emt jaunu l\u0113mumu.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n
No IUB l\u0113muma izriet, ka par pamatotu atz\u012bta “Aimasa” s\u016bdz\u012bbas da\u013ca, kas saist\u012bta ar konkursa uzvar\u0113t\u0101ja finan\u0161u pied\u0101v\u0101juma v\u0113rt\u0113\u0161anu.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
IUB secin\u0101jis, ka VN\u012a nepamatoti veica aritm\u0113tisko k\u013c\u016bdu labojumu uzvar\u0113t\u0101ja finan\u0161u pied\u0101v\u0101jum\u0101, lai gan konkr\u0113taj\u0101 gad\u012bjum\u0101 VN\u012a neesot bijis pamata uzskat\u012bt, ka pretendentam pied\u0101v\u0101jum\u0101 visp\u0101r biju\u0161as aritm\u0113tiskas k\u013c\u016bdas.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
IUB ieskat\u0101 VN\u012a ar \u0161o labojumu p\u0113c b\u016bt\u012bbas groz\u012bjusi uzvar\u0113t\u0101ja pied\u0101v\u0101jumu. “NSHC Group” sav\u0101 finan\u0161u pied\u0101v\u0101jum\u0101 bija nor\u0101d\u012bjis, ka kop\u0113j\u0101s izmaksas atsevi\u0161\u0137\u0101s poz\u012bcij\u0101s veidotas, izv\u0113rt\u0113jot riska iest\u0101\u0161an\u0101s varb\u016bt\u012bbu, t\u0101d\u0113\u013c t\u0101s nav autom\u0101tiski uzskat\u0101mas par k\u013c\u016bdain\u0101m tikai t\u0101p\u0113c, ka nesakr\u012bt ar vien\u012bbas cenas un apjoma reizin\u0101jumu, uzsver IUB.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
IUB ar\u012b secin\u0101jis, ka VN\u012a p\u0113c b\u016bt\u012bbas nav izv\u0113rt\u0113jis, vai uzvar\u0113t\u0101ja s\u0101kotn\u0113ji pied\u0101v\u0101t\u0101 cena attiec\u012bb\u0101 uz \u0161iem darbiem nav nepamatoti zema un vai l\u012bgums par \u0161\u0101du cenu visp\u0101r ir re\u0101li izpild\u0101ms. L\u012bdz ar to IUB atzinis, ka VN\u012a r\u012bc\u012bba var b\u016bt pretrun\u0101 Publisko iepirkumu likuma m\u0113r\u0137im nodro\u0161in\u0101t pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101ja l\u012bdzek\u013cu efekt\u012bvu izmanto\u0161anu un maksim\u0101li samazin\u0101t risku.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Savuk\u0101rt p\u0101r\u0113j\u0101 da\u013c\u0101 “Aimasa” s\u016bdz\u012bba nav atz\u012bta par pamatotu. Nav konstat\u0113ti p\u0101rk\u0101pumi attiec\u012bb\u0101 uz “NSHC Group” atbilst\u012bbu nolikuma pras\u012bb\u0101m par apgroz\u012bjumu, pieredzi k\u0101 galvenajam b\u016bvdarbu veic\u0113jam, b\u016bvkomersantu re\u0123istra pras\u012bb\u0101m, k\u0101 ar\u012b vair\u0101kos v\u0113rt\u0113\u0161anas krit\u0113rijos, tostarp attiec\u012bb\u0101 uz atbild\u012bg\u0101 b\u016bvdarbu vad\u012bt\u0101ja papildu pieredzi, b\u016bvprojekta vad\u012bt\u0101ja un b\u016bvdarbu vad\u012bt\u0101ja sadarb\u012bbas pieredzi un atbild\u012bg\u0101 b\u016bvdarbu vad\u012bt\u0101ja kvalifik\u0101ciju.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Saska\u0146\u0101 ar Publisko iepirkumu likumu IUB l\u0113mumu m\u0113ne\u0161a laik\u0101 no t\u0101 pazi\u0146o\u0161anas dienas var p\u0101rs\u016bdz\u0113t Administrat\u012bvaj\u0101 rajona ties\u0101.<\/p>\n\n\n\n