{"id":264,"date":"2013-01-29T23:13:18","date_gmt":"2013-01-29T21:13:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/?p=264"},"modified":"2013-02-08T10:16:26","modified_gmt":"2013-02-08T08:16:26","slug":"augstakas-tiesas-senata-atzinas-publisko-iepirkumu-lietas","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/?p=264","title":{"rendered":"Augst\u0101k\u0101s tiesas Sen\u0101ta atzi\u0146as publisko iepirkumu liet\u0101s"},"content":{"rendered":"

Tiesas kontrolei p\u0101r iepirkuma proced\u016bru ir noz\u012bme ne tikai konkr\u0113tu lietu ietvaros, bet ar\u012b pla\u0161\u0101k\u0101 m\u0113rog\u0101 \u2013 nosakot virzienu, k\u0101d\u0101 att\u012bst\u0101s izpratne par tiesisku iepirkuma proced\u016bru. K\u0101 liecina tabul\u0101 apkopotie dati, p\u0113d\u0113jos gados strauji audzis Augst\u0101k\u0101s tiesas Sen\u0101ta Administrat\u012bvo lietu departament\u0101 (turpm\u0101k \u2013 Sen\u0101ts) izskat\u012bto iepirkumu lietu skaits. <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n
Gads<\/strong><\/td>\n2004.<\/strong><\/td>\n2005.<\/strong><\/td>\n2006.<\/strong><\/td>\n2007.<\/strong><\/td>\n2008.<\/strong><\/td>\n2009.<\/strong><\/td>\n2010.<\/strong><\/td>\n2011.<\/strong><\/td>\n2012.<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Izskat\u012bto lietu skaits1<\/a><\/sup> (ieskaitot procesu\u0101los jaut\u0101jumus)<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n9<\/td>\n16<\/td>\n16<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Ar spriedumu izskat\u012bt\u0101s lietas<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n

Cerams, ka \u0161\u0101ds k\u0101pums vair\u0101k saist\u012bts ar uz\u0146\u0113m\u0113ju pla\u0161\u0101ku inform\u0113t\u012bbu par vi\u0146u ties\u012bbu un tiesisko intere\u0161u aizsardz\u012bbas iesp\u0113j\u0101m, nevis ar iepirkumu veic\u0113ju negodpr\u0101t\u012bgas vai k\u013c\u016bdainas r\u012bc\u012bbas bie\u017eumu. T\u0101l\u0101k sniegts apkopojo\u0161s ieskats Sen\u0101ta aktu\u0101laj\u0101 praks\u0113, kur\u0101 paust\u0101s atzi\u0146as var kalpot k\u0101 ieteikumi proced\u016bras dal\u012bbniekiem savu ties\u012bbu un tiesisko intere\u0161u aizsardz\u012bb\u0101 un vis\u0101m proced\u016br\u0101 iesaist\u012btaj\u0101m person\u0101m un instit\u016bcij\u0101m god\u012bgas sp\u0113les<\/em> veicin\u0101\u0161an\u0101.<\/p>\n

Personu loks, kur\u0101m pieejamas p\u0101rskat\u012b\u0161anas proced\u016bras,<\/strong> noteikts Publisko iepirkumu likuma 83.panta pirmaj\u0101 da\u013c\u0101 un Sabiedrisko pakalpojumu sniedz\u0113ju iepirkumu likuma 77.panta pirmaj\u0101 da\u013c\u0101, proti, t\u0101s ir personas, kuras ir ieinteres\u0113tas konkr\u0113t\u0101 iepirkuma l\u012bguma nosl\u0113g\u0161an\u0101. Personas interesei j\u0101b\u016bt vai nu faktiskai, vai iesp\u0113jamai, ta\u010du t\u0101 nevar b\u016bt p\u0101r\u0101k att\u0101lin\u0101ta.2<\/a><\/sup> Par faktiski ieinteres\u0113tu var tikt atz\u012bta persona, kura ir piedal\u012bjusies konkr\u0113taj\u0101 iepirkum\u0101. Te gan j\u0101\u0146em v\u0113r\u0101, vai persona iesniegusi pied\u0101v\u0101jumu taj\u0101 iepirkuma da\u013c\u0101, kuras rezult\u0101tu t\u0101 v\u0113las p\u0101rs\u016bdz\u0113t, lai izsl\u0113gtu tikai t\u0101s \u0161\u0137ietamu interesi.3<\/a><\/sup> Ties\u012bbas apstr\u012bd\u0113t un p\u0101rs\u016bdz\u0113t iepirkuma veic\u0113ja (turpm\u0101k \u2013 pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101ja) l\u0113mumus ir ar\u012b personai, kura proced\u016br\u0101 nav piedal\u012bjusies t\u0101d\u0113\u013c, ka proced\u016bras dokument\u0101cija vi\u0146ai to liedz. T\u0101d\u0101 gad\u012bjum\u0101 personas ieinteres\u0113t\u012bbas konstat\u0113\u0161anai var b\u016bt pietiekami ar to, ka persona jau iepriek\u0161 sniegusi t\u0101da pa\u0161a veida pakalpojumus.4<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n

Publisko iepirkumu likuma (PIL) 83.panta pirmaj\u0101 da\u013c\u0101 lietotais j\u0113dziens \u201epersona\u201d iek\u013cauj gan atsevi\u0161\u0137as priv\u0101tpersonas, gan personu apvien\u012bbas ar vai bez juridiskas personas ties\u012bb\u0101m. P\u0113d\u0113jo r\u012bc\u012bba nosak\u0101ma p\u0113c Civillikuma noteikumiem par sabiedr\u012bbas l\u012bgumu. T\u0101d\u0113j\u0101di atsevi\u0161\u0137s personu apvien\u012bbas biedrs apvien\u012bbas v\u0101rd\u0101 var r\u012bkoties tikai tad, ja ir attiec\u012bga vieno\u0161an\u0101s par sabiedr\u012bbas lietu ve\u0161anu vai p\u0101rst\u0101v\u012bbu.5<\/a><\/sup> <\/p>\n

Iepirkumu uzraudz\u012bbas biroja (IUB) l\u0113mumus ties\u0101 var p\u0101rs\u016bdz\u0113t ne tikai persona, kura v\u0113rsusies IUB, bet ar\u012b citas proced\u016br\u0101 ieinteres\u0113t\u0101s personas.6<\/a><\/sup> Starp t\u0101m nav pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101ja.7<\/a><\/sup> Pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101ju mald\u012bgais uzskats par to ties\u012bb\u0101m v\u0113rsties ties\u0101 parasti balst\u012bts gan uz \u0161\u0137ietami nodal\u012bt\u0101m pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101ja un IUB interes\u0113m, gan uz PIL 85.panta pirmaj\u0101 da\u013c\u01018<\/a><\/sup> un Sabiedrisko pakalpojumu sniedz\u0113ju iepirkumu likuma 80.panta pirmaj\u0101 da\u013c\u0101 ietverto nor\u0101di uz dal\u012bbnieku<\/em> ties\u012bb\u0101m v\u0113rsties ties\u0101. Manupr\u0101t, \u0161obr\u012bd pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101ju izpratni par to statusu vajadz\u0113tu veicin\u0101t PIL veiktajiem groz\u012bjumiem, ar kuriem preciz\u0113ts, ka IUB attiec\u012bb\u0101 pret pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101ju ir funkcion\u0101li augst\u0101ka iest\u0101de9<\/a><\/sup>, t\u0101d\u0113j\u0101di skaidri nor\u0101dot uz abu iest\u0101\u017eu vienotu m\u0113r\u0137i un interes\u0113m, k\u0101 ar\u012b groz\u012bjumiem, ar kuriem PIL 85.panta pirmaj\u0101 da\u013c\u0101 izsl\u0113gta nor\u0101de uz dal\u012bbniekiem, par ko sevi nereti uzskata pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101ji.<\/p>\n

Nosakot, vai pieteikums par proced\u016br\u0101 pie\u013cautiem p\u0101rk\u0101pumiem izskat\u0101ms administrat\u012bv\u0101 procesa k\u0101rt\u012bb\u0101, uzman\u012bba piev\u0113r\u0161ama paredzamajai l\u012bgumcenai \u2013 ja t\u0101 nesasniedz ties\u012bbu norm\u0101s noteikto l\u012bgumcenu robe\u017eu10<\/a><\/sup>, iepirkuma proced\u016bras tiesiskums nav p\u0101rbaud\u0101ms administrat\u012bvaj\u0101 ties\u0101.11<\/a><\/sup> Past\u0101v ar\u012b iesp\u0113ja, ka paredzam\u0101s l\u012bgumcenas robe\u017ea netiek sasniegta iepirkuma priek\u0161meta sadal\u012b\u0161anas rezult\u0101t\u0101. Iepriek\u0161 jaut\u0101jums par to, vai ir p\u0101rk\u0101pts iepirkumu likumos11<\/a><\/sup> noteiktais aizliegums sadal\u012bt iepirkuma priek\u0161metu da\u013c\u0101s, lai izvair\u012btos no proced\u016bras piem\u0113ro\u0161anas, nebija administrat\u012bv\u0101s tiesas kompetenc\u0113.13<\/a><\/sup> Ta\u010du, manupr\u0101t, \u0161obr\u012bd tiesa princip\u0101 \u0161\u0101du kontroli var\u0113tu veikt, jo iepirkumu likumu normas \u013cauj person\u0101m v\u0113rsties ties\u0101, prasot atz\u012bt par sp\u0113k\u0101 neeso\u0161u iepirkuma l\u012bgumu, ja tas nosl\u0113gts, nepamatoti nepiem\u0113rojot iepirkuma proced\u016bru.14<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n

\u0160o normu gaism\u0101 var tikt p\u0101rbaud\u012bta ar\u012b pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101ja r\u012bc\u012bba, nosl\u0113dzot iepirkuma l\u012bgumu bez iepirkuma proced\u016bras ar pa\u0161a dibin\u0101tu kapit\u0101lsabiedr\u012bbu, un t\u0101d\u0101 gad\u012bjum\u0101 tiesai j\u0101v\u0113rt\u0113, vai tie\u0161\u0101m ir iest\u0101ju\u0161ies visi ties\u012bbu norm\u0101s paredz\u0113tie priek\u0161noteikumi, kas konkr\u0113taj\u0101 gad\u012bjum\u0101 \u013cauj proced\u016bru nepiem\u0113rot.15<\/a><\/sup> T\u0101pat, k\u0101 atzinis Sen\u0101ts, \u0161\u012bs normas \u013cauj v\u0113rsties ties\u0101 ar\u012b tad, ja iepirkuma veic\u0113ja nosl\u0113gtais l\u012bgums pats par sevi nav iepirkuma l\u012bgums, ta\u010du no l\u012bgumsl\u0113dz\u0113ju m\u0113r\u0137a un l\u012bguma rakstura izriet, ka tas m\u0101ksl\u012bgi nodal\u012bts no kop\u0113j\u0101s iepirkuma proced\u016bras.16<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n

Iepirkuma proced\u016bras ietvaros var tikt p\u0101rs\u016bdz\u0113ta virkne l\u0113mumu, tostarp ar\u012b l\u0113mums par proced\u016bras p\u0101rtrauk\u0161anu vai izbeig\u0161anu; ja proced\u016bra p\u0101rtraukta prettiesiski, tiesa pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101jam var uzdot proced\u016bru turpin\u0101t.17<\/a><\/sup> Negaidot, kad tiks pie\u0146emts l\u0113mums par konkursa uzvar\u0113t\u0101ju, var p\u0101rs\u016bdz\u0113t l\u0113mumu, ar kuru pieteikums atz\u012bts par neatbilsto\u0161u pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101ja pras\u012bb\u0101m. Savuk\u0101rt l\u0113mums, ar kuru cits pied\u0101v\u0101jums atz\u012bts par atbilsto\u0161u, k\u0101 ar\u012b IUB l\u0113mums, ar kuru pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101jam atk\u0101rtoti uzdots izv\u0113rt\u0113t pied\u0101v\u0101jumus, ja tas pats par sevi b\u016btiski neskar personas ties\u012bbas vai tiesisk\u0101s intereses, var tikt p\u0101rbaud\u012bts tikai kop\u0101 ar gal\u012bgo l\u0113mumu par uzvar\u0113t\u0101ja noteik\u0161anu.18<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n

Tiesiskuma kontroles efektivit\u0101ti veicina pagaidu aizsardz\u012bbas l\u012bdzek\u013cu piem\u0113ro\u0161ana<\/strong>. V\u0113r\u0161oties ties\u0101, j\u0101\u0146em v\u0113r\u0101, ka pras\u012btais pagaidu aizsardz\u012bbas l\u012bdzeklis nedr\u012bkst p\u0101rsniegt pras\u012bjuma robe\u017eas.19<\/a><\/sup> Ja lietas izskat\u012b\u0161anas laik\u0101 pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101js nosl\u0113dzis iepirkuma l\u012bgumu, tiesa var izskat\u012bt vairs tikai pras\u012bjumu par l\u0113muma, ar kuru noteikts uzvar\u0113t\u0101js, atz\u012b\u0161anu par prettiesisku, nevis lemt par t\u0101 atcel\u0161anu. \u0160\u0101da pras\u012bjuma kontekst\u0101 nav iesp\u0113jams piem\u0113rot t\u0101du pagaidu aizsardz\u012bbas l\u012bdzekli, kur\u0161 v\u0113rsts uz gal\u012bg\u0101 l\u0113muma darb\u012bbas aptur\u0113\u0161anu, ietverot aizliegumu nosl\u0113gt l\u012bgumu.<\/p>\n

Gad\u012bjumos, kad persona iebildusi pret nosl\u0113gto iepirkuma l\u012bgumu, Sen\u0101ts nor\u0101d\u012bjis, ka pirm\u0101s instances tiesai j\u0101noskaidro, vai persona nev\u0113las groz\u012bt pieteikum\u0101 ietverto pras\u012bjumu, prasot atz\u012bt par sp\u0113k\u0101 neeso\u0161u iepirkuma l\u012bgumu. T\u0101d\u0101 gad\u012bjum\u0101 pieteic\u0113js var\u0113tu l\u016bgt piem\u0113rot pras\u012bjumam atbilsto\u0161o pagaidu aizsardz\u012bbas l\u012bdzekli (aizliegumu veikt ar iepirkuma l\u012bguma izpildi saist\u012btas darb\u012bbas).20<\/a><\/sup> Ta\u010du \u0161\u0101da pieteikuma iesnieg\u0161ana (pieteikuma groz\u012b\u0161ana) ir lietder\u012bga un min\u0113t\u0101 pagaidu aizsardz\u012bbas l\u012bdzek\u013ca piem\u0113ro\u0161ana \u2013 iesp\u0113jama tikai tad, ja konstat\u0113jams k\u0101ds no iepirkumu likumos min\u0113tajiem pamatiem l\u012bguma atz\u012b\u0161anai par sp\u0113k\u0101 neeso\u0161u. \u0160\u0101ds pamats nevar b\u016bt ne pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101ja k\u013c\u016bdas vai p\u0101rk\u0101pumi v\u0113rt\u0113\u0161anas proces\u0101, ne dokument\u0101cij\u0101 ietverto pras\u012bbu prettiesiskums, jo min\u0113t\u0101s normas par \u0161\u0101du pamatu atz\u012bst tikai rupjus p\u0101rk\u0101pumus, t\u0101dus k\u0101 tie\u0161a l\u012bguma nosl\u0113g\u0161ana vai nogaid\u012b\u0161anas termi\u0146a neiev\u0113ro\u0161ana.21<\/a><\/sup> <\/p>\n

Ja tom\u0113r iepirkuma l\u012bgums nav nosl\u0113gts un tiesa konstat\u0113 pirm\u0161\u0137ietamu p\u0101rs\u016bdz\u0113t\u0101 l\u0113muma prettiesiskumu, pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101ju uzman\u012bba v\u0113r\u0161ama uz to, ka t\u0101 saukt\u0101 subjekt\u012bv\u0101 krit\u0113rija22<\/a><\/sup> izv\u0113rt\u0113jum\u0101 var netikt pie\u0161\u0137irta b\u016btiska noz\u012bme mantiskajiem zaud\u0113jumiem, kas tiem rastos proced\u016bras aptur\u0113\u0161anas gad\u012bjum\u0101. K\u0101 nor\u0101d\u012bjis Sen\u0101ts, iz\u0161\u0137iro\u0161as noz\u012bmes pie\u0161\u0137ir\u0161ana ikvien\u0101 gad\u012bjum\u0101 tie\u0161i \u0161im apst\u0101klim novestu pie t\u0101, ka iepirkuma proced\u016bra visp\u0101r neb\u016btu apturama.23<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n

Sen\u0101ta atzi\u0146as attiec\u012bb\u0101 uz pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101ja r\u012bc\u012bbu un l\u0113mumiem p\u0113c b\u016bt\u012bbas<\/strong> \u013cauj secin\u0101t, ka pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101jiem pied\u0101v\u0101jumu v\u0113rt\u0113\u0161an\u0101 j\u0101b\u016bt elast\u012bg\u0101kiem, neaprobe\u017eojoties tikai ar form\u0101lu pied\u0101v\u0101jum\u0101 ietverto zi\u0146u p\u0101rbaudi, kas noved pie nesam\u0113r\u012bgu l\u0113mumu pie\u0146em\u0161anas. Sen\u0101ts vair\u0101kk\u0101rt v\u0113rsis uzman\u012bbu uz pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101jiem PIL paredz\u0113taj\u0101m ties\u012bb\u0101m pras\u012bt pretendentiem preciz\u0113t pied\u0101v\u0101jum\u0101 ietverto inform\u0101ciju, lai p\u0101rliecin\u0101tos par pied\u0101v\u0101juma atbilst\u012bbu proced\u016bras dokument\u0101cijas pras\u012bb\u0101m. Sen\u0101ta ieskat\u0101, pras\u012bba preciz\u0113t vai papildin\u0101t neviennoz\u012bm\u012bgi pasniegto inform\u0101ciju nav uzskat\u0101ma par vienl\u012bdz\u012bbas principa p\u0101rk\u0101pumu attiec\u012bb\u0101 uz p\u0101r\u0113jiem pretendentiem, kuru pied\u0101v\u0101jumos nav k\u013c\u016bdu.24<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n

Inform\u0101cijas preciz\u0113\u0161ana var izpausties, piem\u0113ram, k\u0101 l\u016bgums pretendentam nor\u0101d\u012bt uz to, kur vi\u0146a pied\u0101v\u0101jum\u0101 atrodama inform\u0101cija, kas apliecina atbilst\u012bbu noteiktai konkursa nolikuma pras\u012bbai.25<\/a><\/sup> Turkl\u0101t ar pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101ja piepras\u012bjumu preciz\u0113t inform\u0101ciju saprotama ne tikai, piem\u0113ram, gramatikas vai ac\u012bmredzamu k\u013c\u016bdu izlabo\u0161ana, bet ar\u012b t\u0101das inform\u0101cijas piepras\u012b\u0161ana, kas no pied\u0101v\u0101juma nep\u0101rprotami neizriet. \u0160aj\u0101 sakar\u0101 noz\u012bme ir ar\u012b tam, k\u0101da detaliz\u0101cijas pak\u0101pe pied\u0101v\u0101juma sagatavo\u0161anai paredz\u0113ta nolikum\u0101, k\u0101 ar\u012b tam, cik skaidri no nolikuma izriet pretendentu pien\u0101kums pied\u0101v\u0101jum\u0101 nor\u0101d\u012bt konkr\u0113tas zi\u0146as.26<\/a><\/sup> <\/p>\n

Iepirkuma proced\u016bras dokument\u0101cij\u0101 ietvertaj\u0101m pras\u012bb\u0101m, nov\u0113rt\u0113\u0161anas krit\u0113rijiem un k\u0101rt\u012bbai ir j\u0101atbilst no PIL 2.panta izrieto\u0161ajiem principiem, proti, j\u0101nodro\u0161ina proced\u016bras atkl\u0101tums, br\u012bva konkurence, vienl\u012bdz\u012bga un taisn\u012bga attieksme un l\u012bdzek\u013cu efekt\u012bva izmanto\u0161ana. Tas attiecas ar\u012b uz min\u0113t\u0101 likuma 2.pielikuma B da\u013c\u0101 min\u0113to pakalpojumu iepirkumu.27<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n

Iepirkuma nolikuma noteikumi ir pak\u013cauti interpret\u0101cijai. Past\u0101vot riskam, ka tas, ko saprot gribas izteikuma adres\u0101ts, neatbilst tam, ko grib\u0113jis pateikt gribas izteic\u0113js, var veidoties m\u0113r\u0137u konflikts. \u0160o konfliktu risina, dodot priek\u0161roku ties\u012bbu dro\u0161\u012bbas un prognoz\u0113jam\u012bbas principam, kur\u0161 izteikuma adres\u0101ta intere\u0161u aizsardz\u012bbas nol\u016bkos liek uzskat\u012bt, ka adres\u0101tam saisto\u0161s ir izteikums, k\u0101du tas var\u0113ja saprast k\u0101 gribas izteic\u0113ja gribu.28<\/a><\/sup> T\u0101tad nolikuma interpret\u0101cij\u0101 b\u016btiska noz\u012bme var b\u016bt tie\u0161i tam, k\u0101 konkr\u0113to pras\u012bbu var\u0113ja saprast pied\u0101v\u0101juma iesniedz\u0113js.<\/p>\n

Pirms pretendenta izsl\u0113g\u0161anas no turpm\u0101kas dal\u012bbas proced\u016br\u0101, ir j\u0101izv\u0113rt\u0113, vai izsl\u0113g\u0161ana nav p\u0101rlieku form\u0101la un nesam\u0113r\u012bga. Par t\u0101du atz\u012bta, piem\u0113ram, pretendenta izsl\u0113g\u0161ana, jo t\u0101 iesniegt\u0101 izzi\u0146a par maks\u0101tsp\u0113ju neatbilda pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101ja noteiktajam izsnieg\u0161anas termi\u0146am. Sen\u0101ts uzskat\u012bja, ka izzi\u0146as termi\u0146\u0161 pats par sevi nav objekt\u012bvs krit\u0113rijs pretendentu atlasei, \u0146emot v\u0113r\u0101, ka izzi\u0146as iesnieg\u0161anas m\u0113r\u0137is ir p\u0101rliecin\u0101ties par pretendenta maks\u0101tsp\u0113ju.29<\/a><\/sup> L\u012bdz\u012bga pieeja izmantota ar\u012b gad\u012bjum\u0101, kad pretendents izsl\u0113gts, pamatojoties uz to, ka pied\u0101v\u0101jum\u0101 sniegtas nepatiesas zi\u0146as par t\u0101 kvalifik\u0101ciju. \u0160aj\u0101 gad\u012bjum\u0101 bija noskaidrojams, vai nepatiesajai inform\u0101cijai ir b\u016btiska noz\u012bme pretendenta kvalifik\u0101cijas izv\u0113rt\u0113\u0161an\u0101.30<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n

Pirms noraid\u012bt pied\u0101v\u0101jumu nepamatoti zemas cenas d\u0113\u013c, pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101jam j\u0101pieprasa papildu zi\u0146as no pretendenta, lai dotu iesp\u0113ju pamatot, ka, neraugoties uz cenu, pied\u0101v\u0101jums ir \u012bsts. Pied\u0101v\u0101jumu var noraid\u012bt tikai tad, ja pretendents nav var\u0113jis nor\u0101d\u012bt objekt\u012bvus pier\u0101d\u012bjumus, kas \u013cauj pied\u0101v\u0101t tik zemu cenu. J\u0101\u0146em v\u0113r\u0101, ka gan PIL normu m\u0113r\u0137is, gan likuma \u201ePar valsts un pa\u0161vald\u012bbu finan\u0161u l\u012bdzek\u013cu un mantas iz\u0161\u0137\u0113rd\u0113\u0161anas nov\u0113r\u0161anu\u201d m\u0113r\u0137is ir l\u012bdzek\u013cu iz\u0161\u0137\u0113rd\u0113\u0161anas nov\u0113r\u0161ana. L\u012bdz ar to nav pie\u013caujama pied\u0101v\u0101juma, kura cena ir zem\u0101ka, objekt\u012bvi nepamatota noraid\u012b\u0161ana.31<\/a><\/sup>
\nPublisk\u0101 iepirkuma proced\u016bras principi iev\u0113rojami ne tikai pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101ja darb\u012bb\u0101 l\u012bdz iepirkuma l\u012bguma nosl\u0113g\u0161anai, bet ar\u012b p\u0113c tam. Sen\u0101ts v\u0113rsis uzman\u012bbu uz to, ka pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101jiem j\u0101b\u016bt r\u016bp\u012bgiem un j\u0101p\u0101rliecin\u0101s, vai tiem tiek pieg\u0101d\u0101tas konkursa nolikuma pras\u012bb\u0101m atbilsto\u0161as preces. Nav pie\u013caujama neatbilsto\u0161u pre\u010du pie\u0146em\u0161ana, jo t\u0101d\u0101 veid\u0101 tiek aizskartas citu pieg\u0101d\u0101t\u0101ju ties\u012bbas uz br\u012bvu konkurenci un vienl\u012bdz\u012bgu un taisn\u012bgu attieksmi.32<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n

Neraugoties uz \u0161obr\u012bd sp\u0113k\u0101 eso\u0161o tiesisko regul\u0113jumu, kur\u0161 noteiktos gad\u012bjumos \u013cauj tiesai iepirkuma l\u012bgumu atz\u012bt par sp\u0113k\u0101 neeso\u0161u, visu ar proced\u016bru saist\u012bto personu (tostarp sabiedr\u012bbas kopum\u0101) interes\u0113s ir jebkuras iepirkuma proced\u016bras tiesiskuma atjauno\u0161ana p\u0113c iesp\u0113jas agr\u0101k\u0101 proced\u016bras posm\u0101. T\u0101d\u0113\u013c person\u0101m, kuras nav apmierin\u0101tas ar pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101ju pras\u012bb\u0101m vai kuras uzskata, ka t\u0101s nepamatoti izsl\u0113gtas no turpm\u0101kas dal\u012bbas proced\u016br\u0101, b\u016btu j\u0101izmanto p\u0101rskat\u012b\u0161anas proced\u016bras laikus, nevis tikai p\u0113c gal\u012bg\u0101 l\u0113muma pie\u0146em\u0161anas. <\/p>\n

Teksts: Mg.iur. L\u012aVA SKUJI\u0145A<\/em>, Augst\u0101k\u0101s tiesas Sen\u0101ta Administrat\u012bvo lietu departamenta senatores pal\u012bdze<\/p>\n

______<\/p>\n

1. Apkopoti Tiesu inform\u0101cijas sist\u0113m\u0101 pieejamie dati par liet\u0101m, kur\u0101s pieteikums iesniegts pret Iepirkumu uzraudz\u012bbas biroju, l\u012bdz ar to sniegt\u0101 inform\u0101cija aptver tikai lietas, kur\u0101s p\u0101rs\u016bdz\u0113ts Iepirkumu uzraudz\u012bbas biroja l\u0113mums.\u21a9<\/a><\/sup>
\n2. Sk. Sen\u0101ta 2010.gada 24.marta l\u0113muma liet\u0101 Nr.SKA-293\/2010 10.punktu, Sen\u0101ta 2009.gada 12.j\u016bnija l\u0113muma liet\u0101 Nr.SKA-472\/2009 13.punktu.\u21a9<\/a><\/sup>
\n3. Sk. Sen\u0101ta 2010.gada 24.marta l\u0113muma liet\u0101 Nr.SKA-293\/201012.punktu.\u21a9<\/a><\/sup>
\n4. Sen\u0101ta 2009.gada 12.j\u016bnija l\u0113muma liet\u0101 Nr.SKA-472\/2009 13.punkts, Sen\u0101ta 2012.gada 6.novembra l\u0113muma liet\u0101 Nr.SKA-903\/2012 11.punkts.\u21a9<\/a><\/sup>
\n5. Sen\u0101ta 2009.gada 23.novembra l\u0113muma liet\u0101 Nr.SKA-834\/2009 10.punkts.\u21a9<\/a><\/sup>
\n6. Sen\u0101ta 2010.gada 26.novembra l\u0113muma liet\u0101 Nr.SKA-663\/2010 10.punkts.\u21a9<\/a><\/sup>
\n7. Sk., piem.: Sen\u0101ta 2006.gada 23.maija l\u0113mumu liet\u0101 Nr.SKA-306\/2006, 2008.gada 13.j\u016bnija l\u0113mumu liet\u0101 Nr.SKA-446\/ 2008, 2011.gada 9.marta l\u0113mumu liet\u0101 Nr.SKA-377\/2011, 2012.gada 19.apr\u012b\u013ca l\u0113mumu liet\u0101 Nr.SKA-407\/2012, 2012.gada 26.j\u016bnija l\u0113mumu liet\u0101 Nr.SKA-633\/2012.\u21a9<\/a><\/sup>
\n8. Norma redakcij\u0101, kas bija sp\u0113k\u0101 l\u012bdz 2012.gada 31.j\u016blijam.\u21a9<\/a><\/sup>
\n9. Publisko iepirkumu likuma 80.panta tre\u0161\u0101 da\u013ca redakcij\u0101, kas ir sp\u0113k\u0101 no 2010.gada 15.j\u016bnija.\u21a9<\/a><\/sup>
\n10. Sk. Publisko iepirkumu likuma 8.panta otro da\u013cu un Sabiedrisko pakalpojumu sniedz\u0113ju iepirkumu likuma 11.panta pirmo da\u013cu kop\u0101 ar Ministru kabineta 2010.gada 7.septembra noteikumiem Nr.840 \u201eNoteikumi par sabiedrisko pakalpojumu sniedz\u0113ju iepirkumu l\u012bgumcenu robe\u017e\u0101m\u201d.\u21a9<\/a><\/sup>
\n11. Sk., piem.: Sen\u0101ta 2011.gada 10.maija l\u0113mumu liet\u0101 Nr.SKA-544\/2011, 2011.gada 28.j\u016bnija l\u0113mumu liet\u0101 Nr.SKA-667\/2011.\u21a9<\/a><\/sup>
\n12. \u0160eit un turpm\u0101k \u2013 kop\u0101 Publisko iepirkumu likums un Sabiedrisko pakalpojumu sniedz\u0113ju iepirkumu likums.\u21a9<\/a><\/sup>
\n13. Sk. Sen\u0101ta 2011.gada 10.maija l\u0113muma liet\u0101 Nr.SKA-544\/2011 10.punktu; spriedum\u0101 piem\u0113rots normat\u012bvais regul\u0113jums, kur\u0161 tobr\u012bd v\u0113l neparedz\u0113ja iesp\u0113ju atz\u012bt iepirkuma l\u012bgumu par sp\u0113k\u0101 neeso\u0161u.\u21a9<\/a><\/sup>
\n14. Publisko iepirkumu likuma 85.2panta pirm\u0101s da\u013cas 1.punkts un Sabiedrisko pakalpojumu sniedz\u0113ju iepirkumu likuma 82.panta pirm\u0101s da\u013cas 1.punkts.\u21a9<\/a><\/sup>
\n15. Sen\u0101ta 2012.gada 6.novembra l\u0113mums liet\u0101 Nr.SKA-903\/2012.\u21a9<\/a><\/sup>
\n16. Sk. Sen\u0101ta 2012.gada 8.oktobra l\u0113mumu liet\u0101 Nr.SKA-678.\u21a9<\/a><\/sup>
\n17. Sk., piem.: Sen\u0101ta 2009.gada 30.oktobra l\u0113mumu liet\u0101 Nr.SKA-735\/2009, 2011.gada 2.novembra l\u0113muma liet\u0101 Nr.SKA-1006\/2011 6.punktu.\u21a9<\/a><\/sup>
\n18. Sk. Sen\u0101ta 2012.gada 29.marta l\u0113muma liet\u0101 Nr.SKA-401\/2012 15., 16. un 17.punktu, 2012.gada 17.augusta l\u0113mumu liet\u0101 Nr.SKA-800\/2012.\u21a9<\/a><\/sup>
\n19. Sen\u0101ta 2012.gada 10.janv\u0101ra l\u0113mums liet\u0101 Nr.SKA-204\/2012, 2012.gada 17.apr\u012b\u013ca l\u0113muma liet\u0101 Nr.SKA-476\/2012 11.punkts.\u21a9<\/a><\/sup>
\n20. Sen\u0101ta 2011.gada 5.janv\u0101ra l\u0113muma liet\u0101 Nr.SKA-250\/2011 7. un 8.punkts, 2011.gada 16.marta l\u0113muma liet\u0101 Nr.SKA-468\/2011 8.punkts, 2012.gada 16.marta l\u0113muma liet\u0101 Nr.SKA-354\/2012 5.punkts.\u21a9<\/a><\/sup>
\n21. Sk. ar\u012b Sen\u0101ta 2012.gada 17.apr\u012b\u013ca l\u0113muma liet\u0101 Nr.SKA-476\/2012 17.punktu.\u21a9<\/a><\/sup>
\n22. Tiesu praks\u0113 par subjekt\u012bvo krit\u0113riju tiek d\u0113v\u0113ts priek\u0161noteikums pagaidu aizsardz\u012bbas l\u012bdzek\u013ca piem\u0113ro\u0161anai, kur\u0161 ietver v\u0113rt\u0113jumu par kait\u0113jumu (zaud\u0113jumiem) iesaist\u012btaj\u0101m pus\u0113m.\u21a9<\/a><\/sup>
\n23. Sen\u0101ta 2012.gada 17.augusta l\u0113muma liet\u0101 Nr.SKA-850\/2012 18.2.punkts.\u21a9<\/a><\/sup>
\n24. Sen\u0101ta 2010.gada 16.j\u016blija sprieduma liet\u0101 Nr.SKA-296\/2010 12.punkts.\u21a9<\/a><\/sup>
\n25. Sen\u0101ta 2010.gada 5.novembra sprieduma liet\u0101 Nr.SKA-451\/2010 11.punkts, 2012.gada 22.j\u016bnija sprieduma liet\u0101 Nr.SKA-156\/2012 11.punkts.\u21a9<\/a><\/sup>
\n26. Sen\u0101ta 2010.gada 22.j\u016bnija sprieduma liet\u0101 Nr.SKA-156\/2012 11. un 12.punkts.\u21a9<\/a><\/sup>
\n27. Sen\u0101ta 2012.gada 17.augusta l\u0113muma liet\u0101 Nr.SKA-296\/2012 14.punkts, 2012.gada 3.decembra sprieduma liet\u0101 Nr.SKA-541\/2012 6.punkts.\u21a9<\/a><\/sup>
\n28. Sen\u0101ta 2008.gada 29.apr\u012b\u013ca sprieduma liet\u0101 Nr.SKA-139\/2008 15.1.apak\u0161punkts, 2012.gada 6.febru\u0101ra l\u0113muma liet\u0101 Nr.SKA-267\/2012 8.punkts.\u21a9<\/a><\/sup>
\n29. Sen\u0101ta 2012.gada 14.septembra spriedums liet\u0101 Nr.SKA-366\/2012.\u21a9<\/a><\/sup>
\n30. Sen\u0101ta 2010.gada 16.j\u016blija spriedums liet\u0101 Nr.SKA-296\/2010.\u21a9<\/a><\/sup>
\n31. Sen\u0101ta 2012.gada 18.j\u016bnija spriedums liet\u0101 Nr.SKA-182\/2012.\u21a9<\/a><\/sup>
\n32. Sen\u0101ta 2010.gada 21.j\u016blija sprieduma liet\u0101 Nr.SKA-264\/2010 15.punkts.\u21a9<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Tiesas kontrolei p\u0101r iepirkuma proced\u016bru ir noz\u012bme ne tikai konkr\u0113tu lietu ietvaros, bet ar\u012b pla\u0161\u0101k\u0101 m\u0113rog\u0101 \u2013 nosakot virzienu, k\u0101d\u0101 att\u012bst\u0101s izpratne par tiesisku iepirkuma proced\u016bru. K\u0101 liecina tabul\u0101 apkopotie dati, p\u0113d\u0113jos gados strauji audzis Augst\u0101k\u0101s tiesas Sen\u0101ta Administrat\u012bvo lietu departament\u0101…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1,43],"tags":[67,5],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/264"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=264"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/264\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=264"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=264"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=264"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}