Ska\u013c\u0101kais \u2013 un l\u012bdz galam neatrisin\u0101ts \u2013 skand\u0101ls \u0161aj\u0101 R\u012bgas domes sasaukum\u0101 bija iesp\u0113jam\u0101 vair\u0101ku miljonu eiro izsaimnieko\u0161ana ielu bedr\u012b\u0161u remontos. Koal\u012bcijas partneri sastr\u012bd\u0113j\u0101s, m\u0113rs M\u0101rti\u0146\u0161 Sta\u0137is demision\u0113ja, bet jaut\u0101jums, vai r\u012bdziniekus apkr\u0101pa, palika kar\u0101jamies gais\u0101. Dome veica auditu un iz\u0161\u0137\u0113rd\u012bbu neatkl\u0101ja, tom\u0113r biju\u0161ais izpilddirektora padomnieks M\u0101ris Knoks nor\u0101da \u2013 lieta izmekl\u0113ta nekvalitat\u012bvi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Knoka un Kauli\u0146a secin\u0101jumus\u00a0noraka\u00a0<\/em>\u2013 ne t\u0101p\u0113c, ka tie b\u016btu nekvalitat\u012bvi. Vilnis \u0136irsis (“Jaun\u0101 Vienot\u012bba”) tolaik bija par satiksmi atbild\u012bgais vicem\u0113rs un p\u0101rraudz\u012bja Satiksmes departamentu. Vi\u0146\u0161 \u0161o izmekl\u0113\u0161anu pasniedz k\u0101 politisku uzbrukumu savai partijai.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u0136irsis tagad “Re:Baltica” skaidro, ka Knoka secin\u0101jumiem neuztic\u0113j\u0101s. K\u0101p\u0113c? Jo esot uzdevis jaut\u0101jumus Iepirkumu uzraudz\u012bbas birojam (IUB), pa\u0161am departamentam \u2013 un pats izl\u0113mis, ka izmekl\u0113t\u0101jam nav taisn\u012bba.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Pirmk\u0101rt \u2013 tik sare\u017e\u0123\u012btas lietas izmekl\u0113\u0161ana notika tikai divas ned\u0113\u013cas. Izpilddirektors Lange gala zi\u0146ojum\u0101 2023. gada vasar\u0101 rakst\u012bja, ka disciplin\u0101rlietu izmekl\u0113ja nekvalitat\u012bvi, pavir\u0161i un t\u0101s secin\u0101jumi ir prettiesiski.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Otrk\u0101rt, lai gan \u0136irsis v\u0113l\u0101k uzdeva ar\u012b audit\u0113t departamentu, eksperti p\u0113t\u012bja citu periodu \u2013 ne to, par kuru s\u0101kum\u0101 bija aizdomas par izsaimnieko\u0161anu.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n Knoks izmekl\u0113ja laiku no 2021. gada l\u012bdz 2023. gada pavasarim, auditori \u2013 tikai 2023. gadu. T\u0101p\u0113c vi\u0146i nemaz nevar\u0113ja nov\u0113rt\u0113t, vai nauda par asfaltu izsaimniekota.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Dro\u0161i apgalvot to nevar, jo visp\u0101r\u0113j\u0101 vieno\u0161an\u0101s nenoz\u012bm\u0113 autom\u0101tisku l\u012bgumu sl\u0113g\u0161anu. Ta\u010du, uztur\u0113\u0161anas l\u012bgums bija ar \u010detr\u0101m firm\u0101m (“Roadeks”, “R\u012bgas tilti”, “Ce\u013cu p\u0101rvalde”, “Eco Baltia vide”), bet visp\u0101r\u0113j\u0101 vieno\u0161an\u0101s \u2013 ar asto\u0146\u0101m.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Lai remont\u0113tu gar\u0101kus posmus, izsludina atsevi\u0161\u0137us iepirkumus, nevis izmanto l\u012bgumu par bedr\u012b\u0161u l\u0101p\u012b\u0161anu, “Re:Baltica” inform\u0113ja satiksmes departament\u0101. Neatkar\u012bgo ekspertu apr\u0113\u0137ini par\u0101da \u2013 tas san\u0101k daudz l\u0113t\u0101k.<\/p>\n\n\n\n P\u0113rn beidz\u0101s ikdienas uztur\u0113\u0161anas l\u012bgums. Ta\u010du pa\u0161vald\u012bba sar\u012bkoja konkursu t\u0101, ka pie jaun\u0101 l\u012bguma tika tie pa\u0161i uztur\u0113t\u0101ji.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Iepirkumu izsludin\u0101ja p\u0113d\u0113j\u0101 br\u012bd\u012b. Tas deva priek\u0161roku tiem, kas jau str\u0101d\u0101. Dome neieklaus\u012bj\u0101s Konkurences padomes ieteikum\u0101 sadal\u012bt pils\u0113tas teritoriju septi\u0146\u0101s da\u013c\u0101s un sadal\u012bja \u010detr\u0101s.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Tas var\u0113ja liegt pieteikties maz\u0101kiem komersantiem. “Nek\u0101 person\u012bga” zi\u0146oja, ka ar\u012b nolikums bija labv\u0113l\u012bgs iepriek\u0161\u0113j\u0101 l\u012bguma dal\u012bbniekiem.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Rezult\u0101t\u0101 pie R\u012bgas t\u012br\u012b\u0161anas tika tie pa\u0161i uz\u0146\u0113mumi, kas str\u0101d\u0101ju\u0161i iepriek\u0161 \u2013 “Roadeks”, “R\u012bgas tilti”, “Eco Baltia vide” un “Vizii Urban” (kalpoja k\u0101 apak\u0161uz\u0146\u0113mums). Pievienoj\u0101s “Latvijas Autoce\u013cu uztur\u0113t\u0101js” un “\u013b-Ko”. Bet katra tikai kop\u0101 ar “pieredz\u0113ju\u0161u” firmu. Uz tr\u012bs uztur\u0113\u0161anas da\u013c\u0101m pieteic\u0101s tikai viens pretendents un konkurences nebija.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Tr\u012bs no se\u0161iem uz\u0146\u0113mumiem ir saist\u012bti ar Andra \u0160\u0137\u0113les interes\u0113m. “Roadeks” un “Vizii Urban” pastarpin\u0101ti pieder \u0160\u0137\u0113les \u0123imenei pietuvin\u0101tajam uz\u0146\u0113m\u0113jam Guntaram Kokar\u0113vi\u010dam. Vi\u0146\u0161 pl\u0101noja nopirkt ar\u012b “R\u012bgas tiltus”.<\/p>\n\n\n\n “\u0160o, l\u016bdzu, prasiet izpilddirektoram, es nejaucos iepirkumos,” saka \u0136irsis. “\u0160im es pat nedr\u012bkstu tuvoties. J\u016bs gribat pa vienk\u0101r\u0161o \u2013 a nu tad t\u0101, tad \u0136irsis ir vain\u012bgs pie visa.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n Lange piekr\u012bt, ka iepirkumu vajadz\u0113ja izsludin\u0101t \u0101tr\u0101k, bet par to esot atbild\u012bgs departaments. Vi\u0146\u0161 nor\u0101da \u2013 konkursa nolikumu neviens nav apstr\u012bd\u0113jis.<\/p>\n\n\n\nLietu izmekl\u0113ja nekvalitat\u012bvi<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Vai izv\u0113l\u0113j\u0101s par labu konkr\u0113tam uz\u0146\u0113mumam?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Iepirkumu izsludina p\u0113d\u0113j\u0101 br\u012bd\u012b, pie l\u012bguma tiek tie pa\u0161i uz\u0146\u0113mumi<\/h3>\n\n\n\n