LSM<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Kop\u0161 gada s\u0101kuma Konkurences padomes atkl\u0101to karte\u013cu dal\u012bbniekus iepirkumu komisijas var izsl\u0113gt no pretendentu loka, kaut vai sod\u012btie uz\u0146\u0113mumi konkurences uzraugu l\u0113mumu apstr\u012bd ties\u0101. To paredz jaunie groz\u012bjumi Publisko iepirkumu likum\u0101, kuru m\u0113r\u0137is ir c\u012bn\u012bties pret konkurences principu p\u0101rk\u0101p\u0113jiem. \u0160ogad biju\u0161i ar\u012b pirmie gad\u012bjumi, kad iepirkumu pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101ji izmanto jaun\u0101s likum\u0101 paredz\u0113t\u0101s ties\u012bbas pras\u012bt Konkurences padomei viedokli par aizdom\u012bgiem pretendentiem, kuri var\u0113tu b\u016bt sav\u0101 starp\u0101 vienoju\u0161ies. Neviens gan tie\u0161i \u0161\u012b iemesla d\u0113\u013c no iepirkuma v\u0113l nav izsl\u0113gts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Konkurences padomes atkl\u0101to karte\u013cu dal\u012bbniekiem l\u012bdz \u0161im nebija \u0161\u0137\u0113r\u0161\u013cu turpin\u0101t piedal\u012bties valsts iepirkumos, kam\u0113r konkurences uzraugu piem\u0113rotie sodi ir apstr\u012bd\u0113ti ties\u0101. Tom\u0113r no 1.janv\u0101ra k\u0101rt\u012bba main\u012bta, un tagad iepirkumu komisijas var karte\u013cu dal\u012bbniekus no pretendentu loka izsl\u0113gt, pat ja Konkurences padomes l\u0113mums ir p\u0101rs\u016bdz\u0113ts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Vai k\u0101da komisija karte\u013cu dal\u012bbniekus no pretendentu loka jau ir izsl\u0113gusi, Iepirkumu uzraudz\u012bbas birojs nevar pateikt, jo s\u016bdz\u012bbas par to biroj\u0101 \u0161obr\u012bd nav. Starp pazi\u0146ojumiem biroja m\u0101jaslap\u0101 redzams, ka \u0161ogad izsludin\u0101tos iepirkumos Konkurences padomes sod\u012btie uz\u0146\u0113mumi nav uzvar\u0113ju\u0161i.<\/p>\n\n\n
<\/p>\n\n\n
Tom\u0113r da\u017ei no tiem pasp\u0113ju\u0161i uzvar\u0113t iepirkumos, kas izsludin\u0101ti pirms st\u0101ju\u0161ies sp\u0113k\u0101 jaunie likuma groz\u012bjumi. Piem\u0113ram, \u201cB\u016bvnieku karte\u013ca\u201d liet\u0101 iesaist\u012bt\u0101 firma \u201cAr\u010ders\u201d janv\u0101r\u012b nosl\u0113dza l\u012bgumu ar Izgl\u012bt\u012bbas un zin\u0101tnes ministrijai piedero\u0161o \u201cLatvijas Nacion\u0101lo sporta centru\u201d par 20 miljonu eiro v\u0113rtas sporta halles b\u016bvniec\u012bbu.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
T\u0101pat \u201cAr\u010ders\u201d k\u0101 apak\u0161uz\u0146\u0113mums piesaist\u012bts Liep\u0101jas cietuma b\u016bvniec\u012bbai, par ko l\u012bgums parakst\u012bts novembra beig\u0101s. 125 miljonus eiro v\u0113rtaj\u0101 iepirkum\u0101 uzvar\u0113ja valstij da\u013c\u0113ji piedero\u0161\u0101 uz\u0146\u0113muma \u201cTet\u201d meitaskomp\u0101nija \u201cCitrus Solutions\u201d, un t\u0101 pl\u0101no 25% darbu nodot SIA \u201cAr\u010ders\u201d un v\u0113l 15% \u2013 SIA \u201cAbora\u201d, kas ar\u012b bija \u201cb\u016bvnieku karte\u013ca\u201d liet\u0101.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Uz jaut\u0101jumu, k\u0101d\u0113\u013c izv\u0113l\u0113ti tie\u0161i \u0161ie apak\u0161uz\u0146\u0113mumi, \u201cCitrus Solutions\u201d rakstiski atbild\u0113ja, ka pied\u0101v\u0101jums iesniegts v\u0113l pirms Konkurences padomes l\u0113muma, turkl\u0101t iebildis nav ar\u012b pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101js.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cSpeci\u0101listi projektam tika piesaist\u012bti, \u0146emot v\u0113r\u0101 augst\u0101s un specifisk\u0101s konkursa pras\u012bbas un Latvij\u0101 pavisam nelielo skaitu speci\u0101listu ar atbilsto\u0161u kvalifik\u0101ciju un nepiecie\u0161amo realiz\u0113to objektu apjoma pieredzi. Nevien\u0101 no iepirkumu proced\u016bras k\u0101rt\u0101m projekta pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101jam \u2013 Tiesu namu a\u0123ent\u016brai \u2013 nav biju\u0161i jaut\u0101jumi vai iebildumi par \u0161iem piesaist\u012btajiem apak\u0161uz\u0146\u0113mumiem un speci\u0101listiem,\u201d atbild\u0113ja \u201cCitrus Solutions\u201d p\u0101rst\u0101ve Anna Celma.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Iepirkumu uzraudz\u012bbas biroja (IUB) vad\u012bt\u0101js Artis Lapi\u0146\u0161 nor\u0101d\u012bja, ka l\u012bdz \u0161im Latvij\u0101 iepirkumu regul\u0113jums konkurences p\u0101rk\u0101pumu gad\u012bjum\u0101 bijis sal\u012bdzino\u0161i maigs pret pretendentiem, kaut gan Eiropas Savien\u012bbas noteikumi pie\u013cauj krietni stingr\u0101ku pieeju. Ta\u010du situ\u0101cija ir b\u016btiski main\u012bjusies, un iepirkumos, kas izsludin\u0101ti p\u0113c 1.janv\u0101ra, pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101jam ir ties\u012bbas pretendentus izsl\u0113gt ar\u012b uz aizdomu pamata, ka starp kandid\u0101tiem var\u0113tu b\u016bt k\u0101das vieno\u0161an\u0101s.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Vadl\u012bnijas ar piem\u0113riem, kas \u0161\u0101das aizdomas rada, ir public\u0113tas Iepirkumu uzraudz\u012bbas biroja m\u0101jaslap\u0101.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cProtams, mums prakses \u0161obr\u012bd nav, jo mums tas regul\u0113jums ir sal\u012bdzino\u0161i jauns. Protams, paies k\u0101ds laiks, kam\u0113r prakse izveidosies. Pirmie gad\u012bjumi, kur b\u016bs apstr\u012bd\u0113\u0161ana pie mums [IUB], t\u0101l\u0101k jau noteikti ar\u012b uz tiesu aizies; tiesa jau var\u0113s \u0161o nov\u0113rt\u0113jumu dot, prakse noteikti izveidosies. Taj\u0101 pa\u0161\u0101 laik\u0101 m\u0113s redzam, ka cit\u0101s valst\u012bs \u0161\u0101ds regul\u0113jums darbojas,\u201d sac\u012bja Lapi\u0146\u0161.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Likums noteic \u2013 lai pretendentu izsl\u0113gtu, vajadz\u012bgas \u201cp\u0101rliecino\u0161as nor\u0101des\u201d, lai secin\u0101tu, ka past\u0101v vieno\u0161an\u0101s starp pretendentiem, k\u0101 ar\u012b Konkurences padomes viedoklis par to. Pirmajos divos m\u0113ne\u0161os kop\u0161 jaun\u0101 regul\u0113juma st\u0101\u0161an\u0101s sp\u0113k\u0101<\/p>\n\n\n\n
viedokli Konkurences padomei l\u016bgu\u0161i tr\u012bs pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101ji, kuriem biju\u0161as aizdomas par konkurences p\u0101rk\u0101pumiem.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cPas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101ji vismaz divos gad\u012bjumos pavisam noteikti ir v\u0113rsu\u0161ies piln\u012bgi pamatoti ar pamatot\u0101m ba\u017e\u0101m. Un ar\u012b m\u0113s, apskatoties t\u0101s paz\u012bmes, ko nor\u0101d\u012bjis pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101js un ieg\u016bstot nedaudz v\u0113l papildu inform\u0101ciju, nor\u0101d\u012bj\u0101m sav\u0101 viedokl\u012b, ka j\u0101, \u0161eit, visticam\u0101k, m\u0113s \u0161\u0101das pamatotas paz\u012bmes saskat\u012btu, ka \u0161\u012b iepirkuma pretendenti nav biju\u0161i l\u012bdz galam god\u012bgi,\u201d teica Konkurences padomes Aizliegto vieno\u0161anos departamenta direktore Ieva \u0160mite.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Viens no \u0161iem gad\u012bjumiem ir saist\u012bts ar Latvijas Universit\u0101tes (LU) autobusu nomas iepirkumu. Pieteic\u0101s vair\u0101kas firmas, no kur\u0101m viena uz universit\u0101tes papildu jaut\u0101jumiem atbild\u0113ja, ka lab\u0101k inform\u0101ciju pras\u012bt k\u0101dai citai personai un ats\u016bt\u012bja kontaktinform\u0101ciju. Telefona numurs izr\u0101d\u012bjies t\u0101ds pats, k\u0101du nor\u0101d\u012bjis cits pretendents, ar kuru it k\u0101 b\u016btu j\u0101konkur\u0113.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cLU r\u012bkot\u0101 atkl\u0101t\u0101 konkurs\u0101 \u201cTransporta pakalpojumi neregul\u0101riem pasa\u017eieru p\u0101rvad\u0101jumiem Latvijas Universit\u0101tes vajadz\u012bb\u0101m\u201d viena un t\u0101 pati fizisk\u0101 persona bija sagatavojusi divu pretendentu (uz\u0146\u0113mumu) pied\u0101v\u0101jumus EIS. T\u0101pat tika konstat\u0113ts, ka abi pretendenti konkur\u0113ja, pied\u0101v\u0101jot cenas l\u012bdz\u012bg\u0101 apm\u0113r\u0101 atsevi\u0161\u0137\u0101s iepirkuma da\u013c\u0101s. Min\u0113t\u0101s paz\u012bmes var\u0113ja liecin\u0101t par konkurenci ierobe\u017eojo\u0161as vieno\u0161an\u0101s starp diviem uz\u0146\u0113mumiem par piedal\u012b\u0161anos un t\u0101s noteikumiem atkl\u0101t\u0101 konkurs\u0101 es\u012bbu,\u201d rakstisk\u0101 atbild\u0113 situ\u0101ciju koment\u0113ja LU.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Universit\u0101te l\u0113ma iepirkumu izbeigt, ta\u010du pamatojums tam nebija aizdomas par konkurences p\u0101rk\u0101pumiem, bet gan tas, ka neviens pied\u0101v\u0101jums nav atbildis pras\u012bb\u0101m.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Otrs pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101js, kura aizdomas par konkurences p\u0101rk\u0101pumiem padome atzina par pamatot\u0101m, bija B\u0113rnu kl\u012bnisk\u0101 universit\u0101tes slimn\u012bca (BKUS). Ar\u012b t\u0101 atbild\u0113ja, ka pretendentu izsl\u0113dza citu iemeslu d\u0113\u013c.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
BKUS Juridisk\u0101s un iepirkumu da\u013cas vad\u012bt\u0101ja vietniece \u0100rija Vecmane nor\u0101d\u012bja: \u201cEsam v\u0113rsu\u0161ies Konkurences padom\u0113, kad iepirkuma komisijai rad\u0101s aizdomas par iesp\u0113jamu konkurences p\u0101rk\u0101pumu. Ta\u010du paral\u0113li iepirkuma komisija pied\u0101v\u0101jumu v\u0113rt\u0113\u0161anas laik\u0101 konstat\u0113ja, ka pied\u0101v\u0101jums ir noraid\u0101ms ar konkurences p\u0101rk\u0101pumiem nesaist\u012btu iemeslu d\u0113\u013c, t\u0101p\u0113c Konkurences padomes viedoklim nebija noz\u012bmes l\u0113muma pie\u0146em\u0161an\u0101. Iepirkums bija saist\u012bts ar medic\u012bnas iek\u0101rtu ieg\u0101di.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Konkurences padomes p\u0101rst\u0101ve nor\u0101d\u012bja, ka padomes viedokli pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101js var ar\u012b ne\u0146emt v\u0113r\u0101. Atbild\u012bgais par izsl\u0113g\u0161anu t\u0101pat ir pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101js. Turkl\u0101t 10 dienu termi\u0146\u0161, kura laik\u0101 padomei j\u0101dod sava atbilde, ir p\u0101r\u0101k \u012bss, lai uz t\u0101s pamata vien balst\u012btu l\u0113mumu.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cProtams, nek\u0101da izmekl\u0113\u0161ana padzi\u013cin\u0101ti 10 darba dien\u0101s noteikti nevar notikt, jo tas laiks nav absol\u016bti adekv\u0101ts. Ja m\u0113s zin\u0101m, k\u0101ds ir likum\u0101 paredz\u0113tais termi\u0146\u0161, lai Konkurences padome izp\u0113t\u012btu un pie\u0146emtu l\u0113mumu, tad tas maksimums ir divi gadi. \u0160aj\u0101 gad\u012bjum\u0101 tas ar\u012b nav tam paredz\u0113ts. \u0160is regul\u0113jums ir vair\u0101k dom\u0101ts, lai pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101js pie\u0146emtu patst\u0101v\u012bgi \u0161o l\u0113mumu,\u201d nor\u0101d\u012bja \u0160mite.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
P\u0113d\u0113jais atkl\u0101tais karte\u013ca gad\u012bjums bija pasa\u017eieru p\u0101rvad\u0101jumu jom\u0101. Ar iesaist\u012btajiem uz\u0146\u0113mumiem Autotransporta direkcija sal\u012bdzino\u0161i nesen nosl\u0113gusi ilgtermi\u0146a l\u012bgumus, l\u012bdz ar to kartel\u012b iesaist\u012bt\u0101s firmas var\u0113s sa\u0146emt valsts kompens\u0101cijas par pasa\u017eieru vad\u0101\u0161anu v\u0113l septi\u0146us l\u012bdz desmit gadus. Autotransporta direkcija secin\u0101jusi, ka ar\u012b p\u0113c jaunajiem likuma groz\u012bjumiem jau nosl\u0113gtos l\u012bgumus vienpus\u0113ji lauzt nevar.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Vien\u012bg\u0101s iesp\u0113jas ir gaid\u012bt, kad Konkurences padomes sodus apstiprin\u0101s ar\u012b tiesa, vai ar\u012b vienoties ar uz\u0146\u0113mumiem l\u012bgumus lauzt labpr\u0101t\u012bgi, ko direkcija ar\u012b pied\u0101v\u0101jusi dar\u012bt. Iest\u0101de tagad v\u0113rt\u0113, vai bez kartel\u012b iesaist\u012btajiem uz\u0146\u0113mumiem iesp\u0113jams nosegt Latvijas mar\u0161rutu t\u012bklu.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cJ\u0101atz\u012bm\u0113, ka br\u012bvie resursi ir visai mazi. Tie nokl\u0101j tikai aptuveni 30% no mums vajadz\u012bg\u0101 mar\u0161rutu t\u012bkla. [..] Lai atrastu, kas var\u0113tu aizvietot, ir noteikti j\u0101r\u012bko atk\u0101rtots iepirkums uz t\u0101diem ilgtermi\u0146a nosac\u012bjumiem, dodot laiku sagatavoties p\u0101rvad\u0101t\u0101jam, kas var\u0113tu nodro\u0161in\u0101t \u0161o nep\u0101rtraukt\u012bbu,\u201d sac\u012bja Autotransporta direkcijas Juridisk\u0101s da\u013cas vad\u012bt\u0101ja Vizma Bahareva.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Vi\u0146a ar\u012b nor\u0101d\u012bja, ka Konkurences padomes sod\u012btie uz\u0146\u0113mumi ofici\u0101las atbildes par iesp\u0113ju l\u012bgumus lauzt labpr\u0101t\u012bgi v\u0113l nav sniegu\u0161i. Nek\u0101das kompens\u0101cijas par to direkcija nepied\u0101v\u0101jot. Apmaks\u0101ts tik\u0161ot tikai padar\u012btais darbs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
V\u0113l viens noz\u012bm\u012bgs groz\u012bjums likum\u0101 kop\u0161 Jaun\u0101 gada ir tas, ka viena pretendenta gad\u012bjum\u0101 iepirkums b\u016bs j\u0101p\u0101rtrauc.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Ir gan ar\u012b vair\u0101ki iz\u0146\u0113mumi, piem\u0113ram, iepirkuma p\u0101rtrauk\u0161ana apdraud sabiedr\u012bbas dro\u0161\u012bbas vai vesel\u012bbas aizsardz\u012bbas intereses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Statistika liecina, ka Latvij\u0101 \u0161obr\u012bd ceturtaj\u0101 da\u013c\u0101 iepirkumu ir tikai viens pretendents, kas faktiski noz\u012bm\u0113, ka konkurence izpalikusi. Turkl\u0101t Iepirkumu uzraudz\u012bbas biroja vad\u012bt\u0101js Artis Lapi\u0146\u0161 atkl\u0101ja, ka IT jom\u0101 viena pretendenta iepirkumu \u012bpatsvars ir pat aptuveni 50%.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Viena pretendenta iepirkumu var\u0113s turpin\u0101t ar\u012b gad\u012bjum\u0101, ja pirms iepirkuma izsludin\u0101\u0161anas pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101js ir r\u012bkojis apspiedi ar potenci\u0101lajiem pieg\u0101d\u0101t\u0101jiem. Lapi\u0146\u0161 nor\u0101d\u012bja, ka groz\u012bjumu m\u0113r\u0137is nav viena pretendenta iepirkumus p\u0101rtraukt piln\u012bb\u0101, jo objekt\u012bvu iemeslu d\u0113\u013c ne vienm\u0113r konkurence ir iesp\u0113jama. Tom\u0113r jaunais regul\u0113jums mudin\u0101s iepirkumus r\u012bkot t\u0101, lai tiem var\u0113tu pieteikties liel\u0101ks pretendentu skaits.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kop\u0161 gada s\u0101kuma Konkurences padomes atkl\u0101to karte\u013cu dal\u012bbniekus iepirkumu komisijas var izsl\u0113gt no pretendentu loka, kaut vai sod\u012btie uz\u0146\u0113mumi konkurences uzraugu l\u0113mumu apstr\u012bd ties\u0101. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1938,"featured_media":20367,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[20,120,174,71,43],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20368"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1938"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=20368"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20368\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":20371,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20368\/revisions\/20371"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/20367"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=20368"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=20368"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=20368"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}