Konkurences padome<\/p>\n\n\n\n
2016. gada 25. maij\u0101 Konkurences padome (KP) pie\u0146\u0113ma l\u0113mumu<\/a> par naudas soda un tiesisk\u0101 pien\u0101kuma uzlik\u0161anu SIA \u201cR\u0113zeknes autoosta\u201d, kas \u013caunpr\u0101t\u012bgi izmantoja savu domin\u0113jo\u0161o st\u0101vokli un p\u0101rvad\u0101t\u0101jiem piepras\u012bja p\u0101rm\u0113r\u012bgu maksu par iebrauk\u0161anu R\u0113zeknes autoost\u0101. Sa\u0146emot inform\u0101ciju, ka ar\u012b p\u0113c l\u0113muma gal\u012bg\u0101s sp\u0113k\u0101 st\u0101\u0161an\u0101s SIA \u201cR\u0113zeknes autoosta\u201d noteikt\u0101 maksa par autobusu iebrauk\u0161anu autoost\u0101 nav komerci\u0101li pamatota, KP veica SIA \u201cR\u0113zeknes autoosta\u201d tiesisk\u0101 pien\u0101kuma izpildes uzraudz\u012bbu<\/a>. KP v\u0113rt\u0113ja, vai SIA \u201cR\u0113zeknes autoosta\u201d noteikt\u0101 autobusu iebrauk\u0161anas maksa tiek noteikta atbilsto\u0161i l\u0113mum\u0101 uzliktajam tiesiskajam pien\u0101kumam, proti, vai autoostas iebrauk\u0161anas maksas apr\u0113\u0137in\u0101 netiek iek\u013cautas nepamatotas izmaksas.<\/p>\n\n\n\n KP analiz\u0113ja SIA \u201cR\u0113zeknes autoosta\u201d noteikt\u0101s autobusu iebrauk\u0161anas maksas autoost\u0101 un iebrauk\u0161anas maksas atbilst\u012bbu izmaks\u0101m laika period\u0101 no 2016. gada l\u012bdz 2021. gadam. Lai gan konkr\u0113taj\u0101 laika period\u0101 SIA \u201cR\u0113zeknes autoosta\u201d pl\u0101not\u0101 nomas maksa pamat\u0101 atbilst nomas l\u012bgumos noteiktajam, nor\u0101d\u0101ms, ka p\u0113c b\u016bt\u012bbas t\u0101s apm\u0113rs \u0161aj\u0101 period\u0101, iesp\u0113jams, ir sad\u0101rdzin\u0101ts un t\u0101d\u0113j\u0101di negat\u012bvi ietekm\u0113jis iebrauk\u0161anas maksas apm\u0113ru R\u0113zeknes autoost\u0101.<\/p>\n\n\n\n KP uzraudz\u012bbas gait\u0101 ieguva inform\u0101ciju ar\u012b par citu Latvijas autoostu nomas maks\u0101m. Lai gan autoostu, kuras telpas un zemi nom\u0101 no pa\u0161vald\u012bbas vai priv\u0101ta komersanta, skaits nav sal\u012bdzino\u0161i liels, jo lielai da\u013cai autoostu \u0113kas vai zeme ir pa\u0161as autoostas \u012bpa\u0161um\u0101, tom\u0113r var secin\u0101t, ka nevienai no aptauj\u0101taj\u0101m autoost\u0101m netiek piem\u0113rota tik liela nomas maksa apb\u016bvei (\u0113kai) k\u0101 R\u0113zeknes gad\u012bjum\u0101 un vid\u0113ji nomas maksa ir vismaz divas reizes zem\u0101ka. Lai gan autoostas \u0113kas un teritorijas \u012bpa\u0161nieki nav ierobe\u017eoti noteikt maksu par t\u0101 \u012bpa\u0161uma izmanto\u0161anu, kas neatbilst tirgus apst\u0101k\u013ciem vai kopum\u0101 neatbilst \u012bpa\u0161uma v\u0113rt\u012bbai, KP ieskat\u0101, b\u016btu j\u0101b\u016bt instrumentiem, kas ierobe\u017eotu autoostas operatora, kur\u0161 atrodas domin\u0113jo\u0161\u0101 st\u0101vokl\u012b, t\u0101l\u0101ku \u0161\u012bs maksas piln\u012bgu p\u0101rne\u0161anu uz iebrauk\u0161anas maksas apr\u0113\u0137inu.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Nozares problem\u0101tika un priek\u0161likumi<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Past\u0101vot attiec\u012bgai problem\u0101tikai, KP uzskata, ka ir pamats rais\u012bt diskusiju par nepiecie\u0161am\u012bbu veikt attiec\u012bgus uzlabojumus nozar\u0113 vai groz\u012bjumus normat\u012bvajos aktos, lai risin\u0101tu autoostas iebrauk\u0161anas maksas izmaksu pamatot\u012bbas un atbilst\u012bbas nov\u0113rt\u0113jumu saska\u0146\u0101 ar tirgus situ\u0101ciju, k\u0101 ar\u012b kopum\u0101 veicin\u0101tu god\u012bgu konkurences principu piem\u0113ro\u0161anu attiec\u012bb\u0101 uz autoostu darb\u012bbu.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Autoostu sektor\u0101 konstat\u0113jama ierobe\u017eota konkurence, \u0146emot v\u0113r\u0101, ka katr\u0101 pils\u0113t\u0101 ir ierobe\u017eots skaits pieturu un autoostu, k\u0101 rezult\u0101t\u0101 uz autoostu darb\u012bbu tr\u016bkst konkurences spiediena. Turkl\u0101t re\u0123ion\u0101lo autobusu p\u0101rvad\u0101jumu mar\u0161rutu galapunkti ir noteikti autoost\u0101s, k\u0101 rezult\u0101t\u0101 autoostas p\u0101rvad\u0101t\u0101jiem ir neaizst\u0101jami sadarb\u012bbas partneri, p\u0101rvad\u0101t\u0101jiem esot pak\u013cautiem pien\u0101kumam segt jebk\u0101d\u0101 apm\u0113r\u0101 noteikto autoostas iebrauk\u0161anas maksu. KP uzskata, ka \u0161o situ\u0101ciju ar\u012b da\u013c\u0113ji var\u0113tu risin\u0101t ar pa\u0161vald\u012bbu liel\u0101ku iesaisti autoostu darb\u012bbas koordin\u0113\u0161an\u0101, un iesaisti autoostu atra\u0161an\u0101s vietas noteik\u0161an\u0101 un izv\u0113rt\u0113\u0161an\u0101. B\u016btu noz\u012bm\u012bgi, ka pa\u0161vald\u012bba, nosakot autoostu atra\u0161an\u0101s vietu, veiktu papla\u0161in\u0101tu ekonomisko izv\u0113rt\u0113jumu, nevis vad\u012btos tikai no potenci\u0101lo klientu apmierin\u0101t\u012bbas viedok\u013ca par attiec\u012bgo autoostas vietu. \u012apa\u0161i pa\u0161vald\u012bbu iesaiste autoostas vietas nov\u0113rt\u0113jum\u0101 b\u016btu veicin\u0101ma situ\u0101cij\u0101s, kad autoostas infrastrukt\u016bra \u2013 zemes vai \u0113ku \u012bpa\u0161umties\u012bbas pieder priv\u0101tam \u012bpa\u0161niekam, nevis valstij vai pa\u0161vald\u012bbai.<\/p>\n\n\n\n KP uzsver, ka noz\u012bm\u012bgi b\u016btu apsv\u0113rt ar\u012b papildu alternat\u012bvu mar\u0161rutu apkalpes vietu noteik\u0161anu no pa\u0161vald\u012bbu puses, kur var notikt pasa\u017eieru apkalpo\u0161ana paral\u0113li autoost\u0101m. \u0160\u0101du papildu pieturvietu izvieto\u0161ana nodro\u0161in\u0101tu gan alternat\u012bvu risin\u0101jumu p\u0101rvad\u0101t\u0101jiem, gan ar\u012b pla\u0161\u0101ku transporta pieejam\u012bbu pasa\u017eieriem. Turkl\u0101t, \u0146emot v\u0113r\u0101, ka turpina pieaugt elektroniski ieg\u0101d\u0101to bi\u013ce\u0161u apjoms, oblig\u0101ta autoostas izmanto\u0161ana n\u0101kotn\u0113 pirm\u0161\u0137ietami var\u0113tu neb\u016bt aktu\u0101la.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Saist\u012bb\u0101 ar iebrauk\u0161anas maksas apm\u0113ra liel\u0101ku kontroli un nepiecie\u0161am\u012bbu veicin\u0101t autoostu operatoru v\u0113lmi efektiviz\u0113t izmaksas, kas saist\u012btas ar autoostas apsaimnieko\u0161anu, k\u0101 ar\u012b nepiecie\u0161am\u012bbu nodro\u0161in\u0101t nepiecie\u0161amo izmaksu ekonomiju n\u0101kotn\u0113, nepiecie\u0161ams stiprin\u0101t Autotransporta direkcija pilnvaras kontrol\u0113t iebrauk\u0161anas maksas apr\u0113\u0137in\u0101 iek\u013caujam\u0101s izmaksas. T\u0101 rezult\u0101t\u0101 Autotransporta direkcija sp\u0113tu veikt izmaksu nov\u0113rt\u0113\u0161anu p\u0113c b\u016bt\u012bbas un to atbilst\u012bbu tirgus situ\u0101cijai, kas nodro\u0161in\u0101tu autoostu izmaksu liel\u0101ku kontroli.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Uzraudz\u012bbas ietvaros KP konsult\u0113j\u0101s ar Autotransporta direkciju, kura p\u0113c KP sagatavot\u0101 kopsavilkuma izskat\u012b\u0161anas izteica savu priek\u0161likumu situ\u0101cijas uzlabo\u0161anai tirg\u016b. Autotransporta direkcija saskata, ka autoostas, k\u0101 oblig\u0101ts un attiec\u012bgi no valsts bud\u017eeta apmaks\u0101jams infrastrukt\u016bras objekts b\u016btu saglab\u0101jams tikai valstspils\u0113t\u0101s, jo valstspils\u0113t\u0101s apkalpoto pasa\u017eieru un reisu skaits ir iev\u0113rojami liel\u0101ks. Attiec\u012bgi \u0101rpus valstspils\u0113t\u0101m autoostas statusu b\u016btu iesp\u0113jams ieg\u016bt bez valsts bud\u017eeta finans\u0113juma, ja to l\u012bdzfinans\u0113 pa\u0161vald\u012bba. Citos gad\u012bjumos, ja pils\u0113t\u0101 nav autoostas, tad pa\u0161vald\u012bb\u0101m b\u016btu pien\u0101kums noteikt alternat\u012bvo mar\u0161rutu apkalpes vietu.<\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" KP v\u0113rt\u0113ja, vai SIA \u201cR\u0113zeknes autoosta\u201d noteikt\u0101 autobusu iebrauk\u0161anas maksa tiek noteikta atbilsto\u0161i l\u0113mum\u0101 uzliktajam tiesiskajam pien\u0101kumam, proti, vai autoostas iebrauk\u0161anas maksas apr\u0113\u0137in\u0101 netiek iek\u013cautas nepamatotas izmaksas.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1936,"featured_media":18873,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[29,71,46],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18871"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1936"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=18871"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18871\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":18885,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18871\/revisions\/18885"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/18873"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=18871"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=18871"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=18871"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}