Konkurences padome<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Visizplat\u012bt\u0101kais un vissmag\u0101kais konkurences ties\u012bbu p\u0101rk\u0101pums ir karte\u013ci jeb tirgus dal\u012bbnieku\u00a0aizliegtas vieno\u0161an\u0101s, piem\u0113ram, par cenu, tirgu, dal\u012bbu iepirkum\u0101 vai iepirkuma dal\u012bbas noteikumiem.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Tas noteikts Konkurences likuma 11. pant\u0101, uzsverot, ka ir aizliegtas tirgus dal\u012bbnieku vieno\u0161an\u0101s, kuru m\u0113r\u0137is vai sekas ir konkurences kav\u0113\u0161ana, ierobe\u017eo\u0161ana vai deform\u0113\u0161ana Latvijas teritorij\u0101.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Konkurences padomes (KP) prakse liecina, ka visizplat\u012bt\u0101kais konkurences ties\u012bbu p\u0101rk\u0101pums ir tie\u0161i aizliegtas vieno\u0161an\u0101s par piedal\u012b\u0161anos vai nepiedal\u012b\u0161anos iepirkumos vai izsol\u0113s.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Ja KP saskata iesp\u0113jamas konkurences ties\u012bbu p\u0101rk\u0101puma paz\u012bmes jeb ir aizdomas par tirgus dal\u012bbnieku aizliegt\u0101m vieno\u0161an\u0101m jeb dal\u012bbu kartel\u012b, tom\u0113r iesp\u0113jamais p\u0101rk\u0101pums nav atk\u0101rtots un nav ietekm\u0113jis lielu tirgus un sabiedr\u012bbas da\u013cu, iest\u0101de piem\u0113ro “Konsult\u0113 vispirms” principu, p\u0101rk\u0101pumu nov\u0113r\u0161ot ar br\u012bdin\u0101jumu bez form\u0101las lietas ierosin\u0101\u0161anas.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
2022. gada pirmaj\u0101 pusgad\u0101 KP ir bijusi akt\u012bva br\u012bdin\u0101jumu piem\u0113rot\u0101ja, t\u0101 veikusi piecas prevencijas proced\u016bras, kopum\u0101 br\u012bdinot asto\u0146as juridiskas personas un vienu biedr\u012bbu. Visi min\u0113tie gad\u012bjumi bija saist\u012bti ar iesp\u0113jamiem p\u0101rk\u0101pumiem tie\u0161i publiskajos iepirkumos.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Vien\u0101 no min\u0113tajiem gad\u012bjumiem KP saskat\u012bja aizdomas par saska\u0146otiem pretendentu pied\u0101v\u0101jumiem iepirkumos \u2013 viens pretendents pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101jam bija ats\u016bt\u012bjis papildu piepras\u012bto inform\u0101ciju par tehnisko pied\u0101v\u0101jumu, kur\u0101 dokumenta rekviz\u012btos redzams bija otra pretendenta nosaukums.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Tas pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101jam rad\u012bja pamatotas ba\u017eas par iesp\u0113jamu saska\u0146otu darb\u012bbu abu pretendentu starp\u0101 iepirkuma ietvaros. Savuk\u0101rt cit\u0101 gad\u012bjum\u0101 KP sa\u0146\u0113ma inform\u0101ciju, ka k\u0101d\u0101 pa\u0161vald\u012bbas organiz\u0113taj\u0101 iepirkum\u0101 divi pretendentu iesniegtie tehniskie pied\u0101v\u0101jumi bija l\u012bdz\u012bgi, it \u012bpa\u0161i pielikuma “Tehniskais pied\u0101v\u0101jums” nor\u0101d\u012btie apraksti, k\u0101 ar\u012b pied\u0101v\u0101jumos sken\u0113to lapu mal\u0101m var\u0113ja redz\u0113t identisku apak\u0161fonu.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
T\u0101pat pied\u0101v\u0101jumos iesniegt\u0101s “Excel” datnes rekviz\u012btos bija redzams, ka abiem pretendentiem datnes sagatavojusi persona ar vien\u0101du lietot\u0101jv\u0101rdu un t\u0101s izveidotas vien\u0101dos laikos, kur par da\u017e\u0101m min\u016bt\u0113m at\u0161\u0137\u012br\u0101s p\u0113d\u0113jais dokumenta saglab\u0101\u0161anas laiks. Vienlaikus pa\u0161i pied\u0101v\u0101jumi tika iesniegti Elektronisko iepirkumu sist\u0113m\u0101 vien\u0101 datum\u0101 un l\u012bdz\u012bgos laikos.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Par vienu no aizdom\u012bgajiem gad\u012bjumiem, kur, iesp\u0113jams, saskat\u0101mas aizliegtu vieno\u0161anos paz\u012bmes, zi\u0146oja anon\u012bms zi\u0146ot\u0101js, un \u0161o iesniegumu izv\u0113rt\u0113\u0161anai KP p\u0101rs\u016bt\u012bja iest\u0101des sadarb\u012bbas partneris \u2013 Iepirkumu uzraudz\u012bbas birojs. Iepirkuma organiz\u0113t\u0101js bija valsts kapit\u0101lsabiedr\u012bba, un ar\u012b \u0161aj\u0101 gad\u012bjum\u0101 tika identific\u0113tas vair\u0101kas paz\u012bmes, kas liecin\u0101ja, ka iesniegtie pied\u0101v\u0101jumi nav sagatavoti neatkar\u012bgi. Proti, tika konstat\u0113ts, ka divus it k\u0101 neatkar\u012bgus pied\u0101v\u0101jumus pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101j\u0101m iesniegusi viena un t\u0101 pati persona, k\u0101 ar\u012b parakst\u012bjusi viena un t\u0101 pati persona \u2013 gan tehnisko, gan finan\u0161u pied\u0101v\u0101jumu. \u0160aj\u0101 gad\u012bjum\u0101 abu uz\u0146\u0113mumu dal\u012bbnieki bija savstarp\u0113ji saist\u012btas personas. Visticam\u0101k, uz\u0146\u0113mumi \u0161\u0101d\u0101 veid\u0101 bija r\u012bkoju\u0161ies, lai uzvar\u0113tu p\u0113c iesp\u0113jas vair\u0101k iepirkuma da\u013c\u0101s. Nolikum\u0101 bija noteikts, ka viens uz\u0146\u0113mums var uzvar\u0113t ne vair\u0101k k\u0101 tr\u012bs iepirkuma da\u013c\u0101s, ta\u010du, vienlaikus piedaloties ar diviem uz\u0146\u0113mumiem iepirkum\u0101, palielin\u0101s iesp\u0113ja uzvar\u0113t vair\u0101k\u0101s da\u013c\u0101s, pat se\u0161\u0101s.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Ta\u010du no konkurences ties\u012bbu viedok\u013ca nav pie\u013caujamas \u0161\u0101das saska\u0146otas darb\u012bbas pied\u0101v\u0101jumu sagatavo\u0161anas proces\u0101, kur ac\u012bmredzot bija notikusi sensit\u012bvas inform\u0101cijas apmai\u0146a par pied\u0101v\u0101jumos ietveramo inform\u0101ciju, un p\u0113c b\u016bt\u012bbas t\u0101 bija god\u012bgas konkurences imit\u0101cija konkr\u0113tajos iepirkumos. KP visos \u0161ajos gad\u012bjumos par iesp\u0113jamo p\u0101rk\u0101pumu zi\u0146oja vai nu pats pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101js, vai KP sadarb\u012bbas partneri.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
B\u016btiski, ka tie\u0161i pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101js, atpaz\u012bstot karte\u013ca pirms\u0161\u0137ietam\u0101s paz\u012bmes iepirkum\u0101, par t\u0101m zi\u0146o KP.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
T\u0101p\u0113c ar\u012b KP \u013coti akt\u012bvi izgl\u012bto pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101jus, k\u0101 atpaz\u012bt karte\u013ca pirms\u0161\u0137ietam\u0101s paz\u012bmes. \u0160o prevent\u012bvo aktivit\u0101\u0161u m\u0113r\u0137is ir ne tikai celt sabiedr\u012bbas konkurences ties\u012bbu kult\u016bru kopum\u0101, bet \u012bpa\u0161i svar\u012bgi ir nodro\u0161in\u0101t, ka tie\u0161i pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101js izprot konkurences ties\u012bbu principus un vieno\u0161an\u0101s aizliegumu pretendentu starp\u0101, zina un piem\u0113ro prevent\u012bvos r\u012bkus.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Visizplat\u012bt\u0101kais un vissmag\u0101kais konkurences ties\u012bbu p\u0101rk\u0101pums ir karte\u013ci jeb tirgus dal\u012bbnieku\u00a0aizliegtas vieno\u0161an\u0101s, piem\u0113ram, par cenu, tirgu, dal\u012bbu iepirkum\u0101 vai iepirkuma dal\u012bbas noteikumiem.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1936,"featured_media":18755,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[396,115],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18753"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1936"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=18753"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18753\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":18756,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18753\/revisions\/18756"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/18755"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=18753"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=18753"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=18753"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}