{"id":1553,"date":"2013-07-02T18:03:56","date_gmt":"2013-07-02T16:03:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/?p=1553"},"modified":"2013-07-02T18:11:49","modified_gmt":"2013-07-02T16:11:49","slug":"iepirkumi-likumdosanas-labirinta-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/?p=1553","title":{"rendered":"Iepirkumi likumdo\u0161anas labirint\u0101 2"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>\u017durn\u0101ls <em>Iepirkumi<\/em> turpina diskusiju (s\u0101kums iepriek\u0161\u0113j\u0101 numur\u0101) par atsevi\u0161\u0137\u0101m Publisko iepirkumu likuma (PIL) norm\u0101m un to interpret\u0101ciju. K\u0101 liecina prakse, nereti tie\u0161i \u0161\u012b interpret\u0101cija k\u013c\u016bst par klup\u0161anas akmeni gan iepirkumu organiz\u0113t\u0101jiem, gan pretendentiem. K\u0101p\u0113c daudzas no \u0161\u012bm norm\u0101m ne tikai gr\u016bti izpild\u0101mas, bet ar\u012b ar gr\u016bt\u012bb\u0101m izprotamas? Un galvenais \u2013 vai neskaidr\u012bbas, kas daudziem rada probl\u0113mas, ir iesp\u0113jams nov\u0113rst?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Izeju no likumdo\u0161anas labirinta mekl\u0113:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>zv\u0113rin\u0101ta advok\u0101te <strong>Debora P\u0101vila;<\/strong><\/li>\n<li>Finan\u0161u ministrijas Ties\u012bbu aktu departamenta Valsts resursu politikas noda\u013cas vec\u0101kais eksperts <strong>Artis Lapi\u0146\u0161;<\/strong><\/li>\n<li>VSIA <em>R\u012bgas psihiatrijas un narkolo\u0123ijas centrs<\/em> juriste b\u016bvniec\u012bbas jaut\u0101jumos un Profesion\u0101l\u0101s izgl\u012bt\u012bbas kompetences centra <em>R\u012bgas Valsts tehnikums<\/em> eksperte publisko iepirkumu jaut\u0101jumos <strong>Evija Pu\u0137e;<\/strong><\/li>\n<li>juriste, publisko iepirkumu eksperte, \u0161\u012bs diskusijas vad\u012bt\u0101ja <strong>Ieva L\u0101cenberga-Roc\u0113na.<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Iepriek\u0161\u0113j\u0101 sarun\u0101 tika diskut\u0113ts par t\u0101diem jaut\u0101jumiem k\u0101 p\u0113rn Publisko iepirkumu likum\u0101 iestr\u0101d\u0101to nosac\u012bjumu, ka viena pretendenta atbilst\u012bbas gad\u012bjum\u0101 iepirkuma proced\u016bra j\u0101izbeidz; par PIL 48. pant\u0101 fiks\u0113to nepamatoti l\u0113to pied\u0101v\u0101jumu (kas tas ir un kam \u0161\u012b norma izdev\u012bga); k\u0101 ar\u012b, kam vajadz\u0113tu b\u016bt noteico\u0161ajam iepirkum\u0101 \u2013 saimnieciski izdev\u012bg\u0101kajam pied\u0101v\u0101jumam vai zem\u0101kajai cenai. Un k\u0101p\u0113c praks\u0113 viennoz\u012bm\u012bgi domin\u0113 zem\u0101k\u0101 cena, nevis izdev\u012bgums. <\/p>\n<p>Uz diskusiju aicin\u0101tie eksperti run\u0101ja ar\u012b par t\u0101du likuma normu k\u0101 balst\u012b\u0161anos uz cita sp\u0113j\u0101m. Ko ar to dom\u0101jis likumdev\u0113js \u2013 tehnik\u0101s un profesion\u0101l\u0101s vai finansi\u0101l\u0101s sp\u0113jas? M\u0113\u0123inot rast atbildi uz \u0161o jaut\u0101jumu, neizb\u0113gami j\u0101uzdod n\u0101kamais \u2013 kuras no t\u0101m ir nododamas un kuras nav. <\/p>\n<p>Ar Ievas L\u0101cenbergas-Roc\u0113nas secin\u0101jumu \u201ear\u012b \u0161aj\u0101 gad\u012bjum\u0101 ac\u012bmredzot j\u0101run\u0101 par to, k\u0101 m\u0113s attiec\u012bgo likuma normu interpret\u0113jam. Pareiz\u0101k b\u016btu katr\u0101 konkr\u0113t\u0101 situ\u0101cij\u0101 izanaliz\u0113t l\u012bgumu un apzin\u0101ties, k\u0101di resursi nepiecie\u0161ami t\u0101 izpildei. Nevaram akcept\u0113t, ka uz\u0146\u0113mums, uz kura sp\u0113j\u0101m balst\u0101s l\u012bguma sl\u0113dz\u0113js, k\u013c\u016bst l\u012bdzatbild\u012bgs t\u0101 izpild\u0113. Manupr\u0101t, ja to \u0161\u0101di interpret\u0113jam, tas ierobe\u017eos pieg\u0101d\u0101t\u0101ju iesp\u0113jas piedal\u012bties iepirkumos\u201d diskusija \u017eurn\u0101la maija numur\u0101 ar\u012b beidz\u0101s. Bet, k\u0101 zin\u0101ms \u2013 dz\u012bv\u0113 nekas nebeidzas. <\/p>\n<p><strong>Nabadz\u012bba liek izv\u0113l\u0113ties l\u0113t\u0101ko, nevis lab\u0101ko<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Ieva L\u0101cenberga-Roc\u0113na:<\/strong> \u2013 Neap\u0161aub\u0101mi viena no pa\u0161laik liel\u0101kaj\u0101m probl\u0113m\u0101m, kas attiecas uz publiskajiem iepirkumiem, \u2013 valsts tajos nav gatava saimnieciski izdev\u012bg\u0101kajiem pied\u0101v\u0101jumiem. Pirmk\u0101rt, mums vienk\u0101r\u0161i tam nav naudas. T\u0101da nu reiz ir realit\u0101te. Otrk\u0101rt, nav \u012bsti skaidrs, k\u0101dus krit\u0113rijus izvirz\u012bt \u0161iem saimnieciski izdev\u012bg\u0101kajiem pied\u0101v\u0101jumiem. Speci\u0101listi pa\u0161i nesp\u0113j defin\u0113t, k\u0101 tos nofiks\u0113t un k\u0101 sal\u012bdzin\u0101t. <\/p>\n<p><strong>Debora P\u0101vila:<\/strong> \u2013 Manupr\u0101t, ikvien\u0101 situ\u0101cij\u0101 \u0161ie procesi j\u0101sal\u012bdzina ar ikdienas dz\u012bves realit\u0101ti. Piem\u0113ram, j\u016bsu pa\u0161u dz\u012bvok\u013ca remonts\u2026 Ko j\u016bs izv\u0113l\u0113tos \u2013 zem\u0101ko cenu? Dom\u0101ju, ka tom\u0113r kvalit\u0101ti. Zem\u0101k\u0101 cena, protams, ir viegl\u0101kais un vienk\u0101r\u0161\u0101kais veids, k\u0101 atlas\u012bt pretendentus. Bet zem\u0101ko cenu var pied\u0101v\u0101t ar\u012b tas, kuram ir visai aptuvens priek\u0161stats par veicamo darbu. <\/p>\n<p><strong>Ieva L\u0101cenberga-Roc\u0113na:<\/strong> \u2013 Iepirkumos tom\u0113r darbojas kvalifik\u0101cijas krit\u0113rijs, un tie, kuriem ir visai aptuvens priek\u0161stats, no tiem tiktu izsl\u0113gti. Ne jau velti likumdev\u0113js samain\u012bja viet\u0101m krit\u0113rijus, liekot par prim\u0101ro saimnieciski izdev\u012bg\u0101ko pied\u0101v\u0101jumu. Tas noz\u012bm\u0113 principi\u0101li jaunu pieeju iepirkumiem, bet, ko var dar\u012bt, ja valsts tam nav gatava. Un, k\u0101 jau teicu \u2013 nav gatava finansi\u0101li. <\/p>\n<p><strong>Artis Lapi\u0146\u0161:<\/strong> \u2013 Es dom\u0101ju, ka tik tie\u0161\u0101 veid\u0101, k\u0101 iesaka Debora, m\u0113s iepirkumus ar ikdienas sadz\u012bves realit\u0101ti sal\u012bdzin\u0101t nevaram. Ar\u012b piem\u0113r\u0101 ar dz\u012bvok\u013ca remontu k\u0101 galvenais krit\u0113rijs darbosies pavisam kas cits. Tas, ko var\u0113tu saukt par reput\u0101ciju. Draugu atsauksmes, ieteikumi\u2026 Tas, ko attiec\u012bb\u0101 uz publisko iepirkumu m\u0113s t\u0101 \u012bsti nevaram izv\u0113rt\u0113t.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Debora P\u0101vila:<\/strong> \u2013 K\u0101p\u0113c ne? Atsauksmes v\u0113rt\u0113, nosakot kvalifik\u0101ciju. \u012asten\u012bb\u0101 publiskaj\u0101 iepirkum\u0101 ir \u013coti, \u013coti daudz \u0161\u0101du pretendenta izv\u0113rt\u0113\u0161anas iesp\u0113ju, kuras vajag izmantot. Ja t\u0101s neizmanto, tad paliek tikai zem\u0101k\u0101 cena \u2013 un viss.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Artis Lapi\u0146\u0161:<\/strong> \u2013 Taisn\u012bba, mums ir probl\u0113mas, v\u0113rt\u0113jot kvalit\u0101ti.<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\n<strong>Ieva L\u0101cenberga-Roc\u0113na:<\/strong> \u2013 Vien\u012bgi j\u0101\u0146em v\u0113r\u0101, ka pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101jiem, kas dom\u0101 par saimniecisko izdev\u012bgumu un m\u0113\u0123ina izmantot visas \u0161\u012bs izv\u0113rt\u0113\u0161anas iesp\u0113jas, nepiecie\u0161ams daudz vair\u0101k laika. Turkl\u0101t vi\u0146i ar\u012b vair\u0101k risk\u0113, ka proced\u016bra var tikt apstr\u012bd\u0113ta. Bet taj\u0101 pa\u0161\u0101 laik\u0101 ar\u012b pati Eiropas Komisija (EK) Brisel\u0113 savos iepirkumos vispirms v\u0113rt\u0113 pretendentu pieredzi. <\/p>\n<p><strong>Debora P\u0101vila:<\/strong> \u2013 Tie\u0161i t\u0101! Un ar\u012b pie mums pretendentiem vajag pras\u012bt pavisam konkr\u0113ti. Teiksim, k\u0101di ir biju\u0161i liel\u0101kie projekti p\u0113d\u0113jo triju gadu laik\u0101.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Ieva L\u0101cenberga-Roc\u0113na:<\/strong> \u2013 Un, tikl\u012bdz \u0161\u0101du krit\u0113riju ieliks, t\u0101 uzreiz b\u016bs s\u016bdz\u012bbas Iepirkumu uzraudz\u012bbas birojam.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Artis Lapi\u0146\u0161:<\/strong> \u2013 L\u016bk, te ir viena b\u016btiska nianse. Kad EK p\u0101rst\u0101vji bija Latvij\u0101, m\u0113s vi\u0146iem uzdev\u0101m \u0161o jaut\u0101jumu par pretendenta pieredzi. Turkl\u0101t nevis par b\u016bvniec\u012bbu vai tehnisku pieg\u0101di, bet par intelektu\u0101l\u0101 pakalpojuma l\u012bgumiem. Pats par sevi saprotams: jo ekspertam liel\u0101ka pieredze, jo liel\u0101kas izredzes sa\u0146emt kvalitat\u012bv\u0101ku pakalpojumu. Vi\u0146i uz \u0161o jaut\u0101jumu t\u0101 ar\u012b viennoz\u012bm\u012bgi un tie\u0161i neatbild\u0113ja. \u0160\u0137iet, pa\u0161laik jaunaj\u0101 direkt\u012bv\u0101 tom\u0113r b\u016bs virz\u012bba uz to, ka taml\u012bdz\u012bgos gad\u012bjumos pieredze var\u0113tu b\u016bt viens no noteico\u0161ajiem krit\u0113rijiem. Tom\u0113r v\u0113l b\u016btisk\u0101ks jaunaj\u0101 direkt\u012bv\u0101 var\u0113tu b\u016bt jaut\u0101jums par kop\u0113j\u0101m izmaks\u0101m. M\u0113s parasti koncentr\u0113jamies uz iepirkuma cenu un nedom\u0101jam par ilgtermi\u0146a, piem\u0113ram, uztur\u0113\u0161anas izmaks\u0101m. T\u0101p\u0113c akcents no iepirkuma tie\u0161aj\u0101m izmaks\u0101m, iesp\u0113jams, tiks p\u0101rlikts tie\u0161i uz \u0161\u012bm ilgtermi\u0146a izmaks\u0101m. Ar\u012b Eiropas Parlament\u0101 secin\u0101ju\u0161i, ka ES kopum\u0101 maz \u0146em v\u0113r\u0101 saimniecisko izdev\u012bgumu, t\u0101p\u0113c, ja nevar\u0113s \u0161o probl\u0113mu atrisin\u0101t cit\u0101d\u0101k, ar\u012b vi\u0146iem neatliks nekas cits, k\u0101 iet to pa\u0161u ce\u013cu, ko Latvija \u2013 main\u012bt viet\u0101m krit\u0113rijus, noteikt saimniecisko izdev\u012bgumu par priorit\u0101ti. <\/p>\n<p><strong>\u2013 Ko dar\u012bt, kad ir apgroz\u012bjums, bet nav tehnisko sp\u0113ju?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Evija Pu\u0137e:<\/strong> \u2013 Bet ko t\u0101d\u0101 gad\u012bjum\u0101 dar\u012bt situ\u0101cij\u0101, kad l\u012bgumsl\u0113dz\u0113jam pieredzes nav un vi\u0146\u0161 balst\u0101s uz apak\u0161uz\u0146\u0113m\u0113ju, kam \u0161\u0101da pieredze ir? L\u016bk, piem\u0113ram, pavisam svaigs un konkr\u0113ts gad\u012bjums. Ir kvalifik\u0101cijas pras\u012bba par diviem objektiem un pretendents, \u0161aj\u0101 gad\u012bjum\u0101 b\u016bvuz\u0146\u0113m\u0113js, kuram pa\u0161am nav tehnisko sp\u0113ju izpild\u012bt pas\u016bt\u012bjumu, toties ir likvidit\u0101te un apgroz\u012bjums. T\u0101p\u0113c, lai pras\u012bbas izpild\u012btu, tam neatliek nekas cits k\u0101 piesaist\u012bt apak\u0161uz\u0146\u0113m\u0113ju. Iepirkuma nolikum\u0101 pras\u012bts, ka \u0161\u0101d\u0101 gad\u012bjum\u0101 j\u0101iesniedz vieno\u0161an\u0101s, nor\u0101dot konkr\u0113tus apjomus. Galvenais b\u016bvnieks apak\u0161uz\u0146\u0113m\u0113jam nodevis tikai septi\u0146us procentus. Vai \u0161\u0101d\u0101 gad\u012bjum\u0101 varam uzskat\u012bt, ka vi\u0146\u0161 izpild\u012bjis kvalifik\u0101cijas pras\u012bbu? Tie nav ne 30, pat ne 10 procenti, bet tikai septi\u0146i. Vai te nav pretruna \u2013 pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101js grib redz\u0113t l\u012bgumsl\u0113dz\u0113ju ar konkr\u0113tu pieredzi, bet pretendents \u0161o pieredzi realiz\u0113 caur apak\u0161uz\u0146\u0113m\u0113ju, nododot tam septi\u0146us procentus. <\/p>\n<p><strong>Ieva L\u0101cenberga-Roc\u0113na:<\/strong> \u2013 Cik saprotu, tad pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101ji tom\u0113r to atbalst\u012bju\u0161i?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Evija Pu\u0137e:<\/strong> \u2013 Ne tikai pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101ji, bet ar\u012b IUB to akcept\u0113ja. Un, manupr\u0101t, tas ir diezgan drosm\u012bgs solis. Jo nav jau skaidrs, k\u0101da da\u013ca situ\u0101cij\u0101s, kad balst\u0101s uz pieredzi, var tikt nodota. Simts, septi\u0146desmit vai piecdesmit procenti? \u0160aj\u0101 gad\u012bjum\u0101 tie ir septi\u0146i procenti. Bet varb\u016bt pietiek ar vienu?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Artis Lapi\u0146\u0161:<\/strong> \u2013 Kas t\u0101 bija par pieredzi? Noteikti specifiski darbi?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Evija Pu\u0137e:<\/strong> \u2013 J\u0101. <\/p>\n<p><strong>Artis Lapi\u0146\u0161:<\/strong> \u2013 T\u0101tad, visticam\u0101k, tur b\u016bs ar\u012b v\u0113l citi apak\u0161uz\u0146\u0113m\u0113ji?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Evija Pu\u0137e:<\/strong> \u2013 Pa\u0161laik nor\u0101d\u012bts tikai \u0161is viens. <\/p>\n<p><strong>Artis Lapi\u0146\u0161:<\/strong> \u2013 Es negribu neko ap\u0161aub\u012bt, tom\u0113r\u2026 Nedaudz interesanti tas izklaus\u0101s. <\/p>\n<p><strong>Debora P\u0101vila:<\/strong> \u2013 K\u0101ds bija izv\u0113les krit\u0113rijs?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Evija Pu\u0137e:<\/strong> \u2013 Zem\u0101k\u0101 cena.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Ieva L\u0101cenberga-Roc\u0113na:<\/strong> \u2013 T\u0101tad apak\u0161uz\u0146\u0113m\u0113js piesaist\u012bts, lai kvalific\u0113tos, bet, ja j\u016bs to v\u0113rt\u0113tu k\u0101 saimnieciski izdev\u012bg\u0101ko pied\u0101v\u0101jumu, pretendentiem, visticam\u0101k, vajadz\u0113tu veidot personu apvien\u012bbu. Vai ne t\u0101? <\/p>\n<p><strong>Debora P\u0101vila:<\/strong> \u2013 N\u0113. K\u0101p\u0113c? Dom\u0101ju, mier\u012bgi var palikt l\u012bdz\u0161in\u0113j\u0101 sh\u0113ma, kad l\u012bguma sl\u0113dz\u0113js balst\u0101s uz apak\u0161uz\u0146\u0113m\u0113ju. Vien\u012bgi pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101jam t\u0101d\u0101 gad\u012bjum\u0101 j\u0101v\u0113rt\u0113 apak\u0161uz\u0146\u0113m\u0113ja pieredze. <\/p>\n<p><strong>Garantijas un l\u012bgumsodi<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Ieva L\u0101cenberga-Roc\u0113na:<\/strong> \u2013 Ierosinu p\u0101riet pie n\u0101kam\u0101 jaut\u0101jumu loka. Tas attiecas uz pied\u0101v\u0101jumu nodro\u0161in\u0101jumu un l\u012bguma nodro\u0161in\u0101jumu. Pied\u0101v\u0101jumu nodro\u0161in\u0101jums \u0161obr\u012bd ir noteikts. Ko dar\u012bt ar l\u012bguma nodro\u0161in\u0101jumu, kas nav noteikts likum\u0101? Vai PIL vajadz\u0113tu \u0161o jaut\u0101jumu noregul\u0113t? <\/p>\n<p><strong>Artis Lapi\u0146\u0161:<\/strong> \u2013 Dom\u0101ju, ka n\u0113, jo m\u0113s ar PIL nenoregul\u0113sim visus nodro\u0161in\u0101juma veidus. Turkl\u0101t PIL nevajadz\u0113tu aizst\u0101t Civillikumu, kur\u0101 run\u0101ts gan par sam\u0113r\u012bgumu, gan par l\u012bgumsodiem\u2026 Bez \u0161aub\u0101m, redzot da\u017e\u0101das nesapr\u0101t\u012bgas lietas, mums gribas uzlikt kaut k\u0101du filtru vai vismaz noteikt griestus. Bet tas savuk\u0101rt rada tikai jaunas probl\u0113mas attiec\u012bb\u0101 uz citiem konkr\u0113tiem gad\u012bjumiem. Piem\u0113ram, sankciju parit\u0101te. Vai l\u012bgumsodiem ab\u0101m pus\u0113m j\u0101b\u016bt vien\u0101diem? Mana atbilde b\u016btu \u2013 ne vienm\u0113r. Jo publisk\u0101 puse par l\u012bguma izpildi noteikti samaks\u0101s \u2013 tai pakalpojums vai pre\u010du pieg\u0101de ir vit\u0101li svar\u012bga, turkl\u0101t svar\u012bgi, lai pieg\u0101des vai darbi tiktu paveikti noteiktos termi\u0146os. Savuk\u0101rt pieg\u0101d\u0101t\u0101js var teikt: \u201ePagaidiet!\u201d Jo vi\u0146iem taj\u0101 br\u012bd\u012b varb\u016bt izdev\u012bg\u0101k samaks\u0101t sodu, ja tas nav p\u0101r\u0101k liels. Labs piem\u0113rs \u0161aj\u0101 gad\u012bjum\u0101 ir akc\u012bzes pre\u010du markas, kuru ra\u017eot\u0101jiem Latvijas tirgus var likties p\u0101r\u0101k mazs, t\u0101p\u0113c tas var pagaid\u012bt, bet Latvijas tirgot\u0101ji nevar gaid\u012bt, jo bez \u0161\u012bm mark\u0101m tiem var rasties probl\u0113mas ar vair\u0101k\u0101m pre\u010du grup\u0101m. <\/p>\n<p><strong>Debora P\u0101vila:<\/strong> \u2013 Es piekr\u012btu un uzskatu, ka nevar strikti nodal\u012bt publisko sf\u0113ru no priv\u0101t\u0101s, publiskajai izdot piln\u012bgi citus noteikumus, kas nek\u0101di nav piem\u0113rojami priv\u0101tai sf\u0113rai. Ja priv\u0101taj\u0101 sf\u0113r\u0101 ir ieviesies t\u0101ds j\u0113dziens k\u0101 l\u012bguma izpildes nodro\u0161in\u0101jums, tad tam tur ar\u012b j\u0101b\u016bt, un nevar m\u0101ksl\u012bgi to izsl\u0113gt, pasakot: \u201eN\u0113, publiskajos l\u012bgumos mums nekas t\u0101ds neb\u016bs!\u201d Vien\u012bgi, ja taml\u012bdz\u012bgas pras\u012bbas nepiecie\u0161amas, par t\u0101m j\u0101zina, pirms tiek iesniegti pied\u0101v\u0101jumi, un t\u0101 ir da\u013ca no pied\u0101v\u0101juma, kas, dabiski, ietekm\u0113 ar\u012b cenu. Tom\u0113r nedom\u0101ju, ka tas ir kas \u0101rk\u0101rt\u0113js un nepie\u013caujams. Ar to vien, ka izv\u0113lamies pieg\u0101d\u0101t\u0101ju vai pakalpojuma sniedz\u0113ju p\u0113c da\u017e\u0101diem krit\u0113rijiem, nepietiek. Nepiecie\u0161ams nodro\u0161in\u0101ties. Bet par garantij\u0101m un l\u012bgumsodiem pretendentiem j\u0101b\u016bt savlaic\u012bgi inform\u0113tiem. Tas gan j\u0101atceras.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Likten\u012bgie piecdesmit procenti<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Ieva L\u0101cenberga-Roc\u0113na:<\/strong> \u2013 N\u0101kamais diskusijas v\u0113rtais jaut\u0101jums \u2013likumdo\u0161anas norma, kas paredz apak\u0161uz\u0146\u0113m\u0113ja statusa mai\u0146u b\u016bvniec\u012bbas iepirkumos, ja tam tiek nodoti 50 procenti.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Debora P\u0101vila:<\/strong> \u2013 Ja god\u012bgi, tad praks\u0113 ar to neesmu sask\u0101rusies, bet man ir aizdomas, \u2013 eso\u0161ais regul\u0113jums, ka apak\u0161uz\u0146\u0113m\u0113js, kur\u0161 sasniedzis noteiktu l\u012bdzdal\u012bbas procentu, b\u016btu j\u0101iek\u013cauj personu apvien\u012bb\u0101, nav tiesisks. <\/p>\n<p><strong>Artis Lapi\u0146\u0161:<\/strong> \u2013 Ja nemaldos, k\u0101dreiz likums noteica, ka apak\u0161uz\u0146\u0113m\u0113jam var nodot maksimums 70 procentus. Un EK toreiz s\u0101ka pret Latviju p\u0101rk\u0101puma proced\u016bru. <\/p>\n<p><strong>Debora P\u0101vila:<\/strong> \u2013 (<em>Smejas.<\/em>) Un peln\u012bti!<\/p>\n<p><strong>Artis Lapi\u0146\u0161:<\/strong> \u2013 Es nezinu \u2013 peln\u012bti vai nepeln\u012bti, bet \u0161ai normai \u012bsta pamatojuma nebija. T\u0101p\u0113c, izstr\u0101d\u0101jot jauno normu par 50 procentiem, m\u0113s konsult\u0113j\u0101mies ar EK, un neofici\u0101li mums teica, ka t\u0101 varot b\u016bt. Jaut\u0101juma b\u016bt\u012bba: ja apak\u0161uz\u0146\u0113m\u0113js veic liel\u0101ko da\u013cu darbu, tad k\u0101da ir t\u0101 faktisk\u0101 iesaiste l\u012bgum\u0101? Piem\u0113ram, ja ir \u0123ener\u0101luz\u0146\u0113m\u0113js, kur\u0161 vada projektu un apak\u0161uz\u0146\u0113m\u0113js, kur\u0161 pilda 90 procentus no visiem darbiem, bet faktiski ne par ko neatbild. Kas notiek, ja apak\u0161uz\u0146\u0113m\u0113js \u0161aj\u0101 situ\u0101cij\u0101 vienk\u0101r\u0161i aiziet, jeb, k\u0101 saka, <em>uzmet<\/em> visus, un l\u012bdz ar to da\u013ca darbu paliek neizpild\u012bta? T\u0101tad tas ir risku v\u0113rt\u0113\u0161anas jaut\u0101jums, kas praks\u0113 gan pagaid\u0101m nav konstat\u0113ts. T\u0101p\u0113c ar\u012b m\u016bsu spriedumi \u0161obr\u012bd ir tikai teor\u0113tisk\u0101 l\u012bmen\u012b.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Ieva L\u0101cenberga-Roc\u0113na:<\/strong> \u2013 T\u0101tad, kam\u0113r \u0161\u012b norma nav rad\u012bjusi probl\u0113mas, to nav v\u0113rts main\u012bt.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Artis Lapi\u0146\u0161:<\/strong> \u2013 J\u0101s\u0101k ar to, ka tr\u012bs miljoni Latvijai ir diezgan augsts slieksnis, sal\u012bdzot ar vid\u0113jo iepirkumu valst\u012b. T\u0101p\u0113c vairums iepirkumu ir zem \u0161\u012b sliek\u0161\u0146a un liel\u0101ko da\u013cu uz\u0146\u0113m\u0113ju neskar. <\/p>\n<p><strong>Evija Pu\u0137e:<\/strong> \u2013 No praktisk\u0101s pieredzes varu teikt, ka viens no galvenajiem klup\u0161anas akme\u0146iem b\u016bvniec\u012bb\u0101 ir tie\u0161i l\u012bgumu izpilde. Ir apak\u0161uz\u0146\u0113m\u0113ji un apak\u0161uz\u0146\u0113m\u0113ju apak\u0161uz\u0146\u0113m\u0113ji\u2026 \u012asten\u012bb\u0101 vis\u012bst\u0101kais m\u016b\u017e\u012bgais st\u0101sts, kur \u013coti gr\u016bti izsekot vis\u0101m \u0161\u012bm pak\u0101p\u0113m, jo sav\u0101 pied\u0101v\u0101jum\u0101 pretendents neuzr\u0101da nevienu no tiem. Bet, l\u012bdzko tiek nosl\u0113gts l\u012bgums, t\u0101 s\u0101kas\u2026 Tiek piesaist\u012bts apak\u0161uz\u0146\u0113m\u0113js siltumapg\u0101dei un ventil\u0101cijai, apak\u0161uz\u0146\u0113m\u0113js \u016bdensvadam un kanaliz\u0101cijai, visp\u0101r\u012bgiem celtniec\u012bbas darbiem\u2026 T\u0101p\u0113c pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101jam bie\u017ei nav pa sp\u0113kam risin\u0101t jaut\u0101jumus, kas saist\u012bti ar projektu, papilddarbiem vai materi\u0101liem, jo nav skaidrs, ar ko \u012bsti run\u0101t. <\/p>\n<p><strong>Artis Lapi\u0146\u0161:<\/strong> \u2013 Pag\u0101ju\u0161aj\u0101 m\u0113nes\u012b m\u0113s Brisel\u0113 diskut\u0113j\u0101m tie\u0161i par \u0161o apak\u0161uz\u0146\u0113m\u0113ju jaut\u0101jumu. Liela da\u013ca valstu ir izg\u0101ju\u0161as tam cauri, un tagad saka \u2013 m\u0113s neesam tik bag\u0101ti, lai jauktos iek\u0161\u0101 taj\u0101 vis\u0101. T\u0101p\u0113c ir \u0123ener\u0101luz\u0146\u0113m\u0113js, kur\u0161 atbild\u012bgs par l\u012bgumu, un apak\u0161uz\u0146\u0113m\u0113ji nav m\u016bsu probl\u0113ma. M\u016bsu probl\u0113ma ir nodok\u013cu nomaksa. Un tie\u0161i tas pa\u0161laik ir \u0101rk\u0101rt\u012bgi aktu\u0101li ar\u012b Latvijai. \u0122ener\u0101luz\u0146\u0113m\u0113jiem izzi\u0146as var\u0113tu pat nepras\u012bt. Tur ar nodok\u013ciem viss k\u0101rt\u012bb\u0101. Probl\u0113ma s\u0101kas krietni zem\u0101k\u0101 l\u012bmen\u012b, un m\u016bsu nelaime, ka \u0161o jaut\u0101jumu atkal m\u0113\u0123in\u0101m risin\u0101t ar PIL starpniec\u012bbu. T\u0101p\u0113c ar\u012b \u0161is process k\u0101d\u0101 br\u012bd\u012b k\u013c\u016bst \u013coti smagn\u0113js un sare\u017e\u0123\u012bts. Nevar ar PIL, kur\u0161 piedev\u0101m v\u0113l at\u0161\u0137ir\u012bb\u0101 no Sabiedrisko pakalpojumu sniedz\u0113ja likuma (SPSL) ik pa laikam tiek groz\u012bts, m\u0113\u0123in\u0101t atrisin\u0101t probl\u0113mas, kas tie\u0161\u0101 veid\u0101 uz iepirkumiem pat neattiecas un ar tiem nav saist\u012btas.  <\/p>\n<p><strong>Debora P\u0101vila:<\/strong> \u2013 L\u012bdz ar to mazo iepirkumu griesti PIL ir paaugstin\u0101ti l\u012bdz 30 000, bet sabiedriskiem pakalpojumu sniedz\u0113jiem mazie iepirkumi ir miljons vai vair\u0101k. Un pasakiet man, ka tas nav absurds! <\/p>\n<p><strong><u>Galvenie iemesli, kas kav\u0113 sekm\u012bgu iepirkumu norisi<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Ieva L\u0101cenberga-Roc\u0113na:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Atsevi\u0161\u0137as Publisko iepirkumu likuma normas nav saprotams ne pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101jam, ne pieg\u0101d\u0101t\u0101jam.<\/li>\n<li>Publisko iepirkumu likums pak\u013cauts bie\u017e\u0101m izmai\u0146\u0101m, kas ar\u012b neveicina likuma normu izpratni un to viennoz\u012bm\u012bgu interpret\u0101ciju.<\/li>\n<li>Savstarp\u0113jas cie\u0146as, atbild\u012bbas un uztic\u0113\u0161an\u0101s tr\u016bkums, k\u0101 no pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101ju, t\u0101 no pretendentu puses, kas savuk\u0101rt veicina da\u017e\u0101das aizkuli\u0161u vieno\u0161an\u0101s, kas balst\u0101s uz apsv\u0113rumiem, par ko nezina viena no pus\u0113m vai p\u0101r\u0113jie pretendenti. <\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Artis Lapi\u0146\u0161:<\/strong><br \/>\nJ\u0101run\u0101 par k\u013c\u016bd\u0101m, ko pie\u013cauj pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101ji un pieg\u0101d\u0101t\u0101ji.<br \/>\n<strong>Pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101ji<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Slikta pl\u0101no\u0161ana, nepietiekama tirgus izp\u0113te un nov\u0113lota iepirkumu uzs\u0101k\u0161ana. Nereti ar\u012b izpratnes tr\u016bkums par iepirkuma priek\u0161metu. Rezult\u0101t\u0101 dokumenti sagatavoti pavir\u0161i, risin\u0101jumi nav izv\u0113rt\u0113ti, netiek sasniegts v\u0113lamais rezult\u0101ts.<\/li>\n<li>Nevajadz\u012bgu un nepamatotu pras\u012bbu iek\u013cau\u0161ana iepirkuma dokumentos. T\u0101p\u0113c v\u0113l\u0101k var n\u0101kties noraid\u012bt izdev\u012bgu pied\u0101v\u0101jumu, kur\u0161 neizpilda k\u0101du neb\u016btisku pras\u012bbu.<\/li>\n<li>Uzsvara lik\u0161ana uz pieg\u0101d\u0101t\u0101ju pieredzes v\u0113rt\u0113\u0161anu, aizmirstot, ka konkr\u0113t\u0101 l\u012bguma veiksm\u012bgu izpildi vistie\u0161\u0101k ietekm\u0113s tehnisko specifik\u0101ciju kvalit\u0101te un iepirkuma l\u012bguma noteikumi. Tom\u0113r \u0161\u012bm darb\u012bb\u0101m netiek piesaist\u012bti kvalific\u0113ti speci\u0101listi, kas noved pie t\u0101l\u0101k\u0101m probl\u0113m\u0101m.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Pieg\u0101d\u0101t\u0101ji<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Nov\u0113lota iepaz\u012b\u0161an\u0101s ar iepirkuma proced\u016bras dokumentiem. Rezult\u0101t\u0101 vairs nav laika izv\u0113rt\u0113t pras\u012bbas, t. sk. nepiecie\u0161am\u012bbas gad\u012bjum\u0101 t\u0101s apstr\u012bd\u0113t.<\/li>\n<li>Nev\u0113l\u0113\u0161an\u0101s izprast pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101ju pras\u012bbas, komunic\u0113t ar pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101jiem.<\/li>\n<li>Dempingo\u0161ana, blefo\u0161ana un kr\u0101p\u0161an\u0101s \u2013 tiek apsol\u012bts izpild\u012bt l\u012bgumu par t\u0101du l\u012bgumcenu, kas objekt\u012bvi nav iesp\u0113jams. Pieg\u0101d\u0101t\u0101ji cer, ka v\u0113l\u0101k cenas un noteikumi tiks p\u0101rskat\u012bti. Tom\u0113r stingro ierobe\u017eojumu d\u0113\u013c tas p\u0101rsvar\u0101 nav iesp\u0113jams. Rezult\u0101t\u0101 l\u012bgums netiek izpild\u012bts un ir j\u0101lau\u017e.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Evija Pu\u0137e:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>nekonsekvences iepirkuma dokumentos (pras\u012bbas neiet kop\u0101 ar pievienoto veid\u0146u satura atspogu\u013cojumu);<\/li>\n<li>neveiksm\u012bgi pras\u012bbu formul\u0113jumi, kas rada div\u0113j\u0101du interpret\u0101ciju;<\/li>\n<li>neatbilsto\u0161u terminu (iev\u0113rojot normat\u012bvo regul\u0113jumu) lieto\u0161ana, k\u0101, piem\u0113ram, termini <em>ekvivalents<\/em> un <em>analogs.<\/em><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>P.S. Pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101jam ir probl\u0113mas, ja iepirkuma komisijai rodas v\u0113lme <em>eksperiment\u0113t,<\/em> m\u0113\u0123inot defin\u0113t v\u0113l k\u0101dus izv\u0113les krit\u0113rijus, bet nesp\u0113jot aprakst\u012bt metodolo\u0123iju, k\u0101 tad \u012bsti min\u0113tais krit\u0113rijs tiks v\u0113rt\u0113ts. Tom\u0113r j\u0101atz\u012bst, ka k\u013c\u016bdu iepirkumos ir arvien maz\u0101k, it \u012bpa\u0161i Eiropas l\u012bdzfinans\u0113tajos projektos, jo iepirkuma dokument\u0101cija tiek izskat\u012bta dubult\u0101.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Debora P\u0101vila:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>ja p\u0113c pied\u0101v\u0101juma iesnieg\u0161anas sa\u0146emta v\u0113stule no pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101ja ar l\u016bgumu sniegt k\u0101du skaidrojumu vai papildu inform\u0101ciju, ir b\u016btiski sagatavot p\u0101rdom\u0101tu un pamatotu atbildi. Piem\u0113ram, ja tiek pras\u012bts skaidrojums par pied\u0101v\u0101to cenu vai priek\u0161roc\u012bb\u0101m, k\u0101das pretendentam var\u0113tu b\u016bt, ja k\u0101da no pied\u0101v\u0101jum\u0101 nor\u0101d\u012bt\u0101j\u0101m person\u0101m piedal\u012bjusies iepriek\u0161\u0113jos attiec\u012bg\u0101 iepirkuma posmos, tad pavir\u0161a vai izvair\u012bga atbilde ir dro\u0161s ce\u013c\u0161 uz izsl\u0113g\u0161anu no konkursa, turkl\u0101t \u0161o k\u013c\u016bdu nevar\u0113s labot, apstr\u012bdot pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101ja l\u0113mumu Iepirkumu uzraudz\u012bbas biroj\u0101;<\/li>\n<li>ja k\u0101da nolikuma pras\u012bba ir neskaidra vai da\u017e\u0101di saprotama, tad, iev\u0113rojot likum\u0101 noteiktos termi\u0146us, pras\u012bbas saturs noskaidrojams rakstveid\u0101 pie pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101ja. Pretendenti nereti pa\u013caujas uz savu izpratni par pras\u012bbas interpret\u0101ciju, k\u0101 rezult\u0101t\u0101 pied\u0101v\u0101jums tiek atz\u012bts par neatbilsto\u0161u;<\/li>\n<li>ja pretendents pats nevar izpild\u012bt k\u0101du nolikuma pras\u012bbu un t\u0101s izpild\u012b\u0161anai piesaista citas personas (piem\u0113ram, pieredzes pras\u012bbas izpild\u012b\u0161anai piesaista speci\u0101listu, kas nav pretendenta darbinieks), tad pied\u0101v\u0101jumam j\u0101satur pier\u0101d\u012bjumi par \u0161o resursu atra\u0161anos pretendenta r\u012bc\u012bb\u0101, piem\u0113ram, speci\u0101lista apliecin\u0101jums vai l\u012bgums ar speci\u0101listu.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u017durn\u0101ls Iepirkumi turpina diskusiju par atsevi\u0161\u0137\u0101m Publisko iepirkumu likuma norm\u0101m un to interpret\u0101ciju. K\u0101 liecina prakse, nereti tie\u0161i \u0161\u012b interpret\u0101cija k\u013c\u016bst par klup\u0161anas akmeni gan iepirkumu organiz\u0113t\u0101jiem, gan pretendentiem. K\u0101p\u0113c daudzas no \u0161\u012bm norm\u0101m ne tikai gr\u016bti izpild\u0101mas, bet ar\u012b ar gr\u016bt\u012bb\u0101m izprotamas?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[71,1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1553"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1553"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1553\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1553"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1553"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1553"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}