Lai ar\u012b s\u0101kotn\u0113ji domes darba k\u0101rt\u012bb\u0101 jaut\u0101jums bija iek\u013cauts, Daugavpils domnieki 24. septembr\u012b l\u0113ma atlikt l\u0113mumprojekta skat\u012b\u0161anu par rev\u012bzijas rezult\u0101tiem pa\u0161vald\u012bbas SIA “Daugavpils dz\u012bvok\u013cu un komun\u0101l\u0101s saimniec\u012bbas uz\u0146\u0113mums”<\/b>, kas jau ir non\u0101cis Konkurences padomes (KP) redzeslok\u0101.
\nPa\u0161vald\u012bbas speci\u0101listu komisijai, v\u0113rt\u0113jot uz\u0146\u0113muma iepirkumus, radu\u0161\u0101s aizdomas par iepriek\u0161 norun\u0101tiem iepirkumiem. T\u0101pat izteiktas \u0161aubas par l\u012bdzek\u013cu efekt\u012bvu izmanto\u0161anu. V\u0113rt\u0113jot uz\u0146\u0113muma veikt\u0101s cenu aptaujas, komisija ieteica izskat\u012bt iesp\u0113ju r\u012bkot iepirkuma proced\u016bras, nodro\u0161inot liel\u0101ku iepirkumu atkl\u0101tumu, pieg\u0101d\u0101t\u0101ju br\u012bvu konkurenci.
\nP\u0101rbaudi uz\u0146\u0113mum\u0101 veikusi ar\u012b domes Rev\u012bziju un audita noda\u013ca.<\/b> Ar\u012b t\u0101 secin\u0101ja, ka uz\u0146\u0113muma vad\u012bba, veicot zemsliek\u0161\u0146a iepirkumus, neiev\u0113roja Publisko iepirkumu likuma principus par iepirkumu atkl\u0101tumu, pieg\u0101d\u0101t\u0101ju br\u012bvu konkurenci, vienl\u012bdz\u012bgu un taisn\u012bgu attieksmi pret tiem, k\u0101 ar\u012b pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101ja l\u012bdzek\u013cu efekt\u012bvu izmanto\u0161anu.
\n\u0145emot v\u0113r\u0101 p\u0101rbaud\u0113s konstat\u0113to, KP jau br\u012bdin\u0101jusi divas automazg\u0101tavas un pa\u0161vald\u012bbas uz\u0146\u0113mumu ar iesp\u0113jamu darb\u012bbu saska\u0146o\u0161anu gada s\u0101kum\u0101 kapit\u0101lsabiedr\u012bbas organiz\u0113taj\u0101 cenu aptauj\u0101.
\nSavuk\u0101rt domes s\u0113des darba k\u0101rt\u012bb\u0101 bija iek\u013cauts biju\u0161\u0101 pils\u0113tas m\u0113ra Andreja Elksni\u0146a<\/b>, kura vad\u012b\u0161anas laik\u0101 ar\u012b inici\u0113tas p\u0101rbaudes, sagatavotais l\u0113mumprojekts par p\u0101rbaud\u0113s konstat\u0113to. L\u0113mumprojekts ar\u012b paredz\u0113ja uzdot pa\u0161vald\u012bbas izpilddirektorei Sab\u012bnei \u0160\u0146epstei<\/b> izv\u0113rt\u0113t “Daugavpils dz\u012bvok\u013cu un komun\u0101l\u0101s saimniec\u012bbas uz\u0146\u0113muma”<\/b> valdes locek\u013ca Sergeja Fridmana<\/b> atbilst\u012bbu amatam.
\nP\u0101rbau\u017eu rezult\u0101ti nos\u016bt\u012bti izv\u0113rt\u0113\u0161anai ar\u012b Korupcijas un nov\u0113r\u0161anas apkaro\u0161anas birojam. Savuk\u0101rt Valsts policijas Latgales re\u0123iona p\u0101rvald\u0113 s\u0101kts krimin\u0101lprocess par viltotu dokumentu izmanto\u0161anu iepirkum\u0101 par lietotu automa\u0161\u012bnu ieg\u0101di.
\nDomes s\u0113dei bija sagatavots ar\u012b zv\u0113rin\u0101tu revidentu komp\u0101nijas SIA “Latimira un partneri”<\/b> sl\u0113dziens par domes Rev\u012bziju un audita noda\u013cas darbu, v\u0113rt\u0113jot komun\u0101l\u0101s saimniec\u012bbas uz\u0146\u0113muma iepirkumus. Sl\u0113dzien\u0101 nor\u0101d\u012bts, k\u0101 noda\u013cas zi\u0146ojums neatbilst starptautisko augst\u0101ko rev\u012bzijas iest\u0101\u017eu standartiem. Revidentu komp\u0101nija ar\u012b iesaka domei p\u0101rskat\u012bt noda\u013cas darbinieku amatu aprakstus.
\nTa\u010du ne domes strukt\u016brvien\u012bbu un speci\u0101listu, ne “Latimira un partneri” <\/b>zi\u0146ojumi dom\u0113 \u0161odien netika skat\u012bti. Pils\u0113tas m\u0113rs Igors Prelatovs<\/b> (“M\u016bsu partija”) apgalvoja, ka l\u0113mumprojekta pie\u0146em\u0161anai sagatavotie dokumenti nav re\u0123istr\u0113ti domes dokumentu aprites sist\u0113m\u0101. T\u0101pat ar\u012b “Daugavpils dz\u012bvok\u013cu un komun\u0101l\u0101s saimniec\u012bbas uz\u0146\u0113muma”<\/b> darbinieki neesot iepazinu\u0161ies ar visiem dokumentiem. Ar asto\u0146\u0101m bals\u012bm “par” l\u0113mumprojekta izskat\u012b\u0161ana atlikta.
\nDiskut\u0113jot par Elksni\u0146a <\/b>sagatavoto l\u0113mumprojektu, Rev\u012bziju un audita noda\u013cas revidente \u0145ina Poz\u0146aka<\/b> apgalvoja, ka p\u0113c p\u0101rbaud\u0113m uz\u0146\u0113mum\u0101 vi\u0146a un vi\u0146as \u0123imenes locek\u013ci tiekot izsekoti. Policijai par sav\u0101m aizdom\u0101m vi\u0146a gan nav zi\u0146ojusi.
\nNo diskusiju dal\u012bbniekiem ar\u012b izskan\u0113ja savstarp\u0113jie p\u0101rmetumi par politisko pieder\u012bbu un pietuvin\u0101to personu izv\u0113li darbiem, kas ne\u013caujot kritiski izv\u0113rt\u0113t darbinieku atbild\u012bbu un radot \u0161aubas ar\u012b par izv\u0113l\u0113to zv\u0113rin\u0101tu revidentu komp\u0101niju. Turkl\u0101t par zv\u0113rin\u0101tu revidentu komp\u0101nijas veikto p\u0101rbaudi Rev\u012bziju un audita noda\u013cas vad\u012bt\u0101js Vladimirs Pjankovskis<\/b> esot iesniedzis s\u016bdz\u012bbu Zv\u0113rin\u0101tu revidentu asoci\u0101cijai.
\nJau zi\u0146ots, ka KP br\u012bdin\u0101jusi divas automazg\u0101tavas SIA “Felicitas.Z”<\/b> un SIA “LP Group”<\/b>, k\u0101 ar\u012b “Daugavpils dz\u012bvok\u013cu un komun\u0101l\u0101s saimniec\u012bbas uz\u0146\u0113mumu”<\/b> par iesp\u0113jamu darb\u012bbu saska\u0146o\u0161anu \u0161\u0101 gada s\u0101kum\u0101 kapit\u0101lsabiedr\u012bbas organiz\u0113taj\u0101 cenu aptauj\u0101 par autosalona un virsb\u016bves kop\u0161anas pakalpojumiem.
\nKonkurences uzraugs konstat\u0113jis atsevi\u0161\u0137as aizliegtu vieno\u0161anos paz\u012bmes “Felicitas.Z”<\/b> un “LP Group”<\/b> darb\u012bb\u0101s, piedaloties Daugavpils pa\u0161vald\u012bbas namsaimnieka organiz\u0113taj\u0101 cenu aptauj\u0101 par “Autosalona un virsb\u016bves kop\u0161anas pakalpojumiem”.
\nT\u0101pat KP saskat\u012bjis objekt\u012bvi neizskaidrojamu pa\u0161vald\u012bbas kapit\u0101lsabiedr\u012bbas r\u012bc\u012bbu t\u0101d\u0101s r\u012bkotaj\u0101s cenu aptauj\u0101s k\u0101 reprezent\u0101cijas pre\u010du pieg\u0101de un elektroinstrumentu pieg\u0101de. Piem\u0113ram, uzaicin\u0101jumi par iesp\u0113ju piedal\u012bties cenu aptauj\u0101s s\u016bt\u012bti konkr\u0113tiem uz\u0146\u0113mumiem uz e-pasta adres\u0113m, kas nav publiski pieejamas un identific\u0113jamas ar min\u0113tajiem uz\u0146\u0113mumiem.
\nKP veicot izp\u0113ti, secin\u0101jusi, ka pretendenti cenu aptauj\u0101 par autosalona un virsb\u016bves kop\u0161anas pakalpojumu snieg\u0161anu savos iesniegtajos pied\u0101v\u0101jumos nor\u0101d\u012bjusi augst\u0101kas cenas, nek\u0101 publiski pieejams gan pretendentu, gan citu automazg\u0101tavu t\u012bmek\u013ca vietn\u0113s un pakalpojumu snieg\u0161anas viet\u0101s.
\nSavuk\u0101rt attiec\u012bb\u0101 uz uz\u0146\u0113mumu saska\u0146ot\u0101m darb\u012bb\u0101m cenu aptauj\u0101 KP konstat\u0113jusi, ka pretendentu “Felicitas.Z”<\/b> un “LP Group”<\/b> iesniegtajos pied\u0101v\u0101jumos ir identiskas gramatisk\u0101s k\u013c\u016bdas, kas liecina par abu uz\u0146\u0113mumu iesp\u0113jamu savstarp\u0113ju komunik\u0101ciju un saska\u0146otu darb\u012bbu pirms pied\u0101v\u0101jumu iesnieg\u0161anas.
\nKonkurences uzrauga Aizliegtu vieno\u0161anos departamenta direktore Ieva \u0160mite<\/b> st\u0101st\u012bja, ka \u0161aj\u0101 cenu aptauj\u0101 nov\u0113rotas aizdom\u012bgas sakrit\u012bbas gan uz\u0146\u0113m\u0113ju, gan iepirkuma organiz\u0113t\u0101ju r\u012bc\u012bb\u0101, kas liek uzdot jaut\u0101jumus par godpr\u0101t\u012bgu publisko finan\u0161u l\u012bdzek\u013cu izlietojumu.
\n“Publiskai personai, kas \u0161aj\u0101 gad\u012bjum\u0101 ir Daugavpils pa\u0161vald\u012bbas kapit\u0101lsabiedr\u012bba, ar savu r\u012bc\u012bbu b\u016btu j\u0101r\u0101da piem\u0113rs sabiedr\u012bbai par atbild\u012bgu un god\u012bgu r\u012bc\u012bbu, t\u0101p\u0113c ir nepie\u0146emami, ka kapit\u0101lsabiedr\u012bba jebk\u0101d\u0101 veid\u0101 ir iesaist\u012bta pati vai veicina uz\u0146\u0113m\u0113ju iesaisti konkurences ties\u012bbu p\u0101rk\u0101pum\u0101,”<\/i> pauda \u0160mite<\/b>.
\nKP saglab\u0101 inform\u0101ciju par izteiktajiem br\u012bdin\u0101jumiem. Ja br\u012bdin\u0101tais uz\u0146\u0113mums n\u0101kotn\u0113 atk\u0101rtoti non\u0101ks KP redzeslok\u0101 saist\u012bb\u0101 ar l\u012bdz\u012bgiem iesp\u0113jamiem p\u0101rk\u0101pumiem, tie tiks izmekl\u0113ti k\u0101 atk\u0101rtota p\u0101rk\u0101puma lieta.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Lai ar\u012b s\u0101kotn\u0113ji domes darba k\u0101rt\u012bb\u0101 jaut\u0101jums bija iek\u013cauts, Daugavpils domnieki 24. septembr\u012b l\u0113ma atlikt l\u0113mumprojekta skat\u012b\u0161anu par rev\u012bzijas rezult\u0101tiem pa\u0161vald\u012bbas SIA “Daugavpils dz\u012bvok\u013cu un komun\u0101l\u0101s saimniec\u012bbas uz\u0146\u0113mums”<\/b>, kas jau ir non\u0101cis Konkurences padomes (KP) redzeslok\u0101.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[30,115,71,43],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13864"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=13864"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13864\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":13865,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13864\/revisions\/13865"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=13864"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=13864"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=13864"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}