{"id":11207,"date":"2019-04-03T12:01:09","date_gmt":"2019-04-03T10:01:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/?p=11207"},"modified":"2019-04-03T10:21:32","modified_gmt":"2019-04-03T08:21:32","slug":"dazas-tiesu-prakses-atzinas-iii","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/?p=11207","title":{"rendered":"Da\u017eas tiesu prakses atzi\u0146as (III)"},"content":{"rendered":"

Rakst\u0101 turpin\u0101m apskat\u012bt Latvijas Republikas Augst\u0101k\u0101s Tiesas (AT) atzi\u0146as1<\/a><\/sup>, \u0161oreiz piev\u0113r\u0161oties 2018. gada otrajai pusei.<\/p>\n

Kvalifik\u0101cijas pras\u012bbas:<\/b> AT ieskat\u0101 k\u0101d\u0101 liet\u0101 nevar nepaman\u012bt, ka kopum\u0101 speci\u0101listiem izvirz\u012bt\u0101s kvalifik\u0101cijas pras\u012bbas ir detaliz\u0113tas un specifiskas. Pras\u012bbu nians\u0113ta piel\u0101go\u0161ana konkr\u0113tai b\u016bvniec\u012bbai vai \u0113kai var novest pie t\u0101, ka kvalific\u0113ties sp\u0113j \u013coti \u0161aurs pieg\u0101d\u0101t\u0101ju loks. Tas var rad\u012bt ba\u017eas, ka nolikums, iesp\u0113jams, veidots t\u0101, lai piedal\u012bties var\u0113tu tikai viens pretendents. Tom\u0113r zemo konkurences l\u012bmeni var b\u016bt rad\u012bju\u0161as ar\u012b augstas, ta\u010du objekt\u012bvi pamatotas pras\u012bbas. Katr\u0101 iepirkum\u0101 past\u0101v objekt\u012bva nepiecie\u0161am\u012bba samazin\u0101t pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101ja risku pirkt nekvalitat\u012bvu pakalpojumu, un tie\u0161i pieg\u0101d\u0101t\u0101ja pieredze, kvalifik\u0101cija ir viens no faktoriem, kas \u013cauj nov\u0113rt\u0113t sagaid\u0101mo kvalit\u0101ti. Pieredzes pras\u012bbas var tikt izvirz\u012btas atbilsto\u0161i (sam\u0113r\u012bgi) p\u0113rkam\u0101 pakalpojuma apjomam, sare\u017e\u0123\u012bt\u012bbai un citiem b\u016btiskiem aspektiem. Cikt\u0101l pras\u012bbas nav nesam\u0113r\u012bgas, tiesa likuma ietvaros nevar uzlikt pien\u0101kumu samazin\u0101t vai groz\u012bt izvirz\u012bt\u0101s kvalifik\u0101cijas pras\u012bbas tikai t\u0101d\u0113\u013c, ka teor\u0113tiski tas var\u0113tu b\u016btu iesp\u0113jams. (18.12.2018. SKA-1675\/2018<\/b>)
\n
\nMetu konkurss:<\/b> \u0112kas mets var iev\u0113rojami at\u0161\u0137irties atkar\u012bb\u0101 no t\u0101, vai tam ir izvirz\u012bti k\u0101di ierobe\u017eojumi un vai tie \u0146emti v\u0113r\u0101. Lai metu autori konkur\u0113tu uz vienl\u012bdz\u012bgiem pamatiem, ir b\u016btiski, lai tiem jau meta iesnieg\u0161anas laik\u0101 ir saprotama pras\u012bbu noz\u012bme un lai v\u0113l\u0101k pras\u012bbu iev\u0113ro\u0161ana tiktu vien\u0101di nov\u0113rt\u0113ta. Konkr\u0113to nolikumu nevar tulkot t\u0101d\u0113j\u0101di, ka tas pie\u0161\u0137ir pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101jai r\u012bc\u012bbas br\u012bv\u012bbu attiec\u012bb\u0101 uz to, vai nolikumam neatbilsto\u0161s mets ir vai nav izsl\u0113dzams. Ja pati pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101ja ir izvirz\u012bjusi metam konkr\u0113tas pras\u012bbas un nolikum\u0101 nav paredz\u0113ts v\u0113rt\u0113t meta atbilst\u012bbas l\u012bmeni \u0161\u012bm pras\u012bb\u0101m, tad pras\u012bb\u0101m neatbilsto\u0161s mets ir izsl\u0113dzams neatkar\u012bgi no t\u0101, vai tas ir tie\u0161i paredz\u0113ts nolikum\u0101. <\/b>(13.07.2018. SKA-605\/2018<\/b>)<\/p>\n

Pied\u0101v\u0101juma atbilst\u012bba:<\/b> Attiec\u012bb\u0101 uz uzvar\u0113t\u0101jas finan\u0161u apgroz\u012bjumu AT secina, ja pieteic\u0113ja uzskat\u012bja, ka pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101jai jebkur\u0101 gad\u012bjum\u0101 b\u016btu vajadz\u0113jis piepras\u012bt papildu inform\u0101ciju, lai p\u0101rliecin\u0101tos par sniegt\u0101s inform\u0101cijas patiesumu, tad tai vajadz\u0113ja apstr\u012bd\u0113t nolikumu, jo tas, ka pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101ja par atbilst\u012bbu pras\u012bbai p\u0101rliecin\u0101sies no pa\u0161u pretendentu iesniegtaj\u0101m izzi\u0146\u0101m, bija nor\u0101d\u012bts jau nolikum\u0101. \u0160\u0101dos apst\u0101k\u013cos visp\u0101r\u012bgi apgalvojumi un nekonkr\u0113tas atsauces uz publiski pieejamu inform\u0101ciju nav pietiekami, lai var\u0113tu atz\u012bt, ka past\u0101v objekt\u012bvs pamats \u0161aub\u0101m par izzi\u0146\u0101 nor\u0101d\u012bt\u0101s inform\u0101cijas patiesumu, l\u012bdz ar to ne pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101jai, ne birojam, ne tiesai nav pamata mekl\u0113t un piepras\u012bt pier\u0101d\u012bjumus, lai par to p\u0101rliecin\u0101tos. Str\u012bdus pras\u012bba \u2013 finan\u0161u apgroz\u012bjums konkr\u0113t\u0101 b\u016bvniec\u012bbas jom\u0101 \u2013 p\u0113c savas b\u016bt\u012bbas ir t\u0101da, ka atbilst\u012bbu tai var\u0113tu apliecin\u0101t pretendents pats, un \u0161\u0101ds apliecin\u0101jums pats par sevi nav pamats \u0161aub\u0101m par inform\u0101cijas patiesumu. AT judikat\u016br\u0101 nav atz\u012bts, ka pretendenta apliecin\u0101jums nekad nevar b\u016bt pietiekams pier\u0101d\u012bjums pretendenta finansi\u0101l\u0101 un saimniecisk\u0101 st\u0101vok\u013ca atbilst\u012bbai pras\u012bb\u0101m \u2013 tas ir atkar\u012bgs gan no konkr\u0113t\u0101s pras\u012bbas, gan no str\u012bdus apliecin\u0101juma satura. <\/b>(26.10.2018. SKA-1569\/2018<\/b>) Attiec\u012bb\u0101 uz pras\u012bbu par at\u013cauju B kategorijas pies\u0101r\u0146ojo\u0161o darb\u012bbu veik\u0161anai AT atg\u0101dina, ka pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101jam ir pien\u0101kums nolikuma pras\u012bbas interpret\u0113t atbilsto\u0161i likuma m\u0113r\u0137im un p\u0101rliecin\u0101ties, vai iesniegtie apliecin\u0101jumi (vai citi pras\u012btie pier\u0101d\u012bjumi) patie\u0161\u0101m apstiprina resursu, uz kuriem dota atsauce, izmanto\u0161anas iesp\u0113ju balst\u012b\u0161an\u0101s gad\u012bjum\u0101, un, \u0146emot v\u0113r\u0101 pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101ja m\u0113r\u0137i, izvirzot konkr\u0113tas pras\u012bbas pretendenta pieredzei (kvalitat\u012bva l\u012bguma izpilde), pieredzes k\u0101 resursa specifiku (nemateri\u0101ls un personisks) un to, ka pier\u0101d\u012bjumiem j\u0101apstiprina re\u0101la resursu izmanto\u0161anas iesp\u0113ja, secin\u0101ms, ka pieredzes nodo\u0161ana ir pier\u0101d\u012bta tikai tad, ja pier\u0101d\u012bjumi apstiprina pieredz\u0113ju\u0161\u0101s personas vai t\u0101s attiec\u012bgo resursu paredzamo iesaisti l\u012bguma izpild\u0113<\/b>. AT secina, ka pies\u0101r\u0146ojo\u0161as darb\u012bbas at\u013cauja neseko iek\u0101rtai \u2013 t\u0101s izsnieg\u0161ana un darb\u012bba ir nesaraujami saist\u012bta ar konkr\u0113tu par iek\u0101rtas darb\u012bbu atbild\u012bgu personu, kas ir \u0161\u012bs iek\u0101rtas operators. Citam komersantam izsniegta at\u013cauja B kategorijas pies\u0101r\u0146ojo\u0161ai darb\u012bbai var b\u016bt lietder\u012bga konkr\u0113t\u0101 l\u012bguma izpild\u0113 tikai tad, ja attiec\u012bgais komersants pats l\u012bguma ietvaros veiks darb\u012bbu, kurai izsniegta attiec\u012bg\u0101 at\u013cauja, ja tas b\u016bs atbild\u012bgs par \u0161\u012bs darb\u012bbas veik\u0161anu vai ja tam b\u016bs noteico\u0161\u0101 ekonomisk\u0101 ietekme uz darb\u012bbas tehnisko izpild\u012bjumu. <\/b>P\u0101rbaudot pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101jas l\u0113muma tiesiskumu, noz\u012bme ir tam, vai pretendents atbilda pras\u012bb\u0101m pied\u0101v\u0101juma iesnieg\u0161anas laik\u0101, nevis jebkur\u0101 laik\u0101 p\u0113c tam, cit\u0101di tiktu p\u0101rk\u0101pts vienl\u012bdz\u012bgas attieksmes princips attiec\u012bb\u0101 pret p\u0101r\u0113j\u0101m person\u0101m, kuras r\u0113\u0137in\u0101j\u0101s, ka pras\u012bbas izpild\u0101mas pied\u0101v\u0101jumu iesnieg\u0161anas termi\u0146\u0101. (09.10.2018. SKA-895\/2018<\/b>)<\/p>\n

Inform\u0101cijas preciz\u0113\u0161ana:<\/b> Rajona tiesa uzskat\u012bja, ka pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101js var\u0113tu noskaidrot k\u0101du vienu neskaidru jaut\u0101jumu, bet, ja j\u0101p\u0101rbauda tr\u012bs speci\u0101listu pieredze, t\u0101 vairs neb\u016btu uzskat\u0101ma par neprecizit\u0101tes labo\u0161anu. AT nor\u0101da, ka noz\u012bme ir pied\u0101v\u0101juma nepiln\u012bbu un attiec\u012bgi piepras\u0101m\u0101s inform\u0101cijas saturam, nevis vien\u012bgi apjomam<\/b>. Neap\u0161aubot to, ka pied\u0101v\u0101juma sagatavo\u0161anai b\u016btu j\u0101piev\u0113r\u0161as ar pien\u0101c\u012bgu r\u016bp\u012bbu, AT ar\u012b v\u0113r\u0161 uzman\u012bbu, ka pretendenta izsl\u0113g\u0161ana nav izmantojama k\u0101 sods par tr\u016bkumiem pied\u0101v\u0101juma noform\u0113\u0161an\u0101<\/b>. Apsverot nepiecie\u0161am\u012bbu pretendentu izsl\u0113gt pied\u0101v\u0101juma nepiln\u012bbu d\u0113\u013c, b\u016btiski izv\u0113rt\u0113t ne tikai pras\u012bbu skaidr\u012bbu, bet ar\u012b (galvenok\u0101rt) to, k\u0101ds ir nepiln\u012bbu raksturs \u2013 vai izsl\u0113g\u0161ana to d\u0113\u013c neb\u016btu p\u0101rlieku form\u0101la un vai t\u0101s ir iesp\u0113jams nov\u0113rst, nodro\u0161inot vienl\u012bdz\u012bgu un taisn\u012bgu attieksmi. (28.09.2018. SKA-1076\/2018<\/b>) Savuk\u0101rt izskatot jaut\u0101jumu par to, vai pie\u0146emot uzvar\u0113t\u0101jas iesniegtos pier\u0101d\u012bjumus par to, ka t\u0101s r\u012bc\u012bb\u0101 l\u012bguma izpildes laik\u0101 b\u016bs citas personas resursi (pieredze), ir akcept\u0113ti pied\u0101v\u0101juma groz\u012bjumi, AT nor\u0101d\u012bjusi, ka nevar piekrist pieteic\u0113jai, ka uzvar\u0113t\u0101ja groz\u012bjusi pied\u0101v\u0101jumu t\u0101d\u0113j\u0101di, ka s\u0101kotn\u0113ji pied\u0101v\u0101jum\u0101 nebija nor\u0101d\u012bts konkr\u0113ts sadarb\u012bbas saturs, bet v\u0113l\u0101k nor\u0101d\u012bts jau uz konkr\u0113tiem darbiem, kuri tiks uztic\u0113ti SIA. Tie\u0161i t\u0101 ar\u012b ir pied\u0101v\u0101juma preciz\u0113\u0161anas j\u0113ga \u2013 konkretiz\u0113t k\u0101du pied\u0101v\u0101juma aspektu.<\/b> Ar\u012b nolikums \u0161aj\u0101 zi\u0146\u0101 nenoteica iesniedzamo pier\u0101d\u012bjumu detaliz\u0101cijas pak\u0101pi. Vienlaikus par uzvar\u0113t\u0101ju atz\u012btais pretendents laika gait\u0101, iesp\u0113jams, sniedzis at\u0161\u0137ir\u012bgu skaidrojumu par pied\u0101v\u0101juma saturu, kas savuk\u0101rt var nor\u0101d\u012bt uz to, ka pied\u0101v\u0101jums patie\u0161\u0101m ir groz\u012bts, nevis vien\u012bgi preciz\u0113ts. Pied\u0101v\u0101juma preciz\u0113\u0161anas j\u0113ga ir atkl\u0101t pretendenta jau pied\u0101v\u0101juma iesnieg\u0161anas laik\u0101 past\u0101v\u0113ju\u0161o ieceri attiec\u012bb\u0101 uz pied\u0101v\u0101jumu, kas s\u0101kotn\u0113ji nav formul\u0113ta pietiekami konkr\u0113ti vai skaidri, ta\u010du jauna satura pie\u0161\u0137ir\u0161ana k\u0101dam pied\u0101v\u0101juma formul\u0113jumam (pat ja \u0161is saturs s\u0101kotn\u0113jam nekonkr\u0113tajam formul\u0113jumam atbilst) uzskat\u0101ma par pied\u0101v\u0101juma groz\u012bjumiem.<\/b> S\u0101kotn\u0113j\u0101 spriedum\u0101 ir konstat\u0113ts pretendenta s\u0101kotn\u0113jais skaidrojums par sadarb\u012bbas veidu (konsult\u0101cij\u0101m), ta\u010du tiesa nav \u0146\u0113musi v\u0113r\u0101 \u0161\u012b skaidrojuma at\u0161\u0137ir\u012bbu no v\u0113l\u0101k sniegt\u0101 skaidrojuma, lai gan pa\u0161am pretendentam sadarb\u012bbas saturam b\u016btu j\u0101b\u016bt skaidram jau pied\u0101v\u0101juma iesnieg\u0161anas laik\u0101, un at\u0161\u0137ir\u012bgu skaidrojumu snieg\u0161ana var liecin\u0101t par pied\u0101v\u0101juma groz\u012b\u0161anu.<\/b> (31.10.2018. SKA-1006\/2018<\/b>)<\/p>\n

V\u0113rt\u0113\u0161anas krit\u0113riji:<\/b> Saist\u012bb\u0101 ar sarunu proced\u016bru par mar\u0161ruta autobusu pakalpojumiem AT atk\u0101rtojusi, ka tiesas kompetenc\u0113 nav pras\u012bbu nov\u0113rt\u0113\u0161ana no lietder\u012bbas vai ekonomisk\u0101 izdev\u012bguma viedok\u013ca. T\u0101pat pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101jas prettiesiska r\u012bc\u012bba iepriek\u0161 un aizdomas par iesp\u0113jamu prettiesisku r\u012bc\u012bbu n\u0101kotn\u0113 nav pietiekams pamats atz\u012bt par prettiesiskiem v\u0113rt\u0113\u0161anas krit\u0113rijus. To tiesiskums nov\u0113rt\u0113jams, \u0146emot v\u0113r\u0101 konkr\u0113to krit\u0113riju saturu un piem\u0113ro\u0161anas k\u0101rt\u012bbu, kas izriet no sarunu proced\u016bras dokumentiem.<\/b> AT ieskat\u0101 divi str\u012bdus krit\u0113riji pirm\u0161\u0137ietami ir prettiesiski. Krit\u0113rijs \u201ePretendenta pied\u0101v\u0101tie bi\u013ce\u0161u veidi\u201d paredz v\u0113rt\u0113t pied\u0101v\u0101juma saimniecisko izdev\u012bgumu atkar\u012bb\u0101 no t\u0101, vai pied\u0101v\u0101t\u0101 bi\u013ce\u0161u sist\u0113ma nodro\u0161ina iesp\u0113ju ieg\u0101d\u0101to pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101jas viedbi\u013ceti izmantot pretendenta sabiedriskaj\u0101 transport\u0101 un citam pretendentam \u2013 at\u0161\u0137ir\u012bb\u0101 no eso\u0161\u0101 pakalpojumu sniedz\u0113ja \u2013 nav iesp\u0113jams apr\u0113\u0137in\u0101t izmaksas, kas saist\u012btas ar viedbi\u013cetes akcept\u0113\u0161anu, un pien\u0101c\u012bgi sagatavot finan\u0161u pied\u0101v\u0101jumu, radot nevienl\u012bdz\u012bgu st\u0101vokli un nepamatotas priek\u0161roc\u012bbas eso\u0161ajam pakalpojumu sniedz\u0113jam. Savuk\u0101rt finan\u0161u pied\u0101v\u0101jumu nov\u0113rt\u0113\u0161anas k\u0101rt\u012bba, cikt\u0101l t\u0101 paredz v\u0113rt\u0113t papildpakalpojumu apjomu tiem pied\u0101v\u0101jumiem, kuru cena ir zem\u0101ka nek\u0101 pamattarifs, zem\u0101kas cenas pied\u0101v\u0101juma gad\u012bjum\u0101 autom\u0101tiski paredz liel\u0101kas saist\u012bbas, nek\u0101 tas b\u016btu gad\u012bjum\u0101, ja tiktu pied\u0101v\u0101ta cena, kas vien\u0101da vai liel\u0101ka par pamattarifu, un \u0161\u0101dam papildu saist\u012bbu apjomam tie\u0161i attiec\u012bb\u0101 uz zem\u0101kas cenas pied\u0101v\u0101jumu nav saskat\u0101ms racion\u0101ls pamatojums. (20.02.2018. SKA-1459\/2018<\/b>)<\/p>\n

Nogaid\u012b\u0161anas termi\u0146\u0161: pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101jiem j\u0101\u0146em v\u0113r\u0101 AT izpratne par nogaid\u012b\u0161anas termi\u0146u viena pied\u0101v\u0101juma gad\u012bjum\u0101. Pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101ja uzskat\u012bja, ka pieteic\u0113ja nav atz\u012bstama par pretendenti, jo t\u0101 nebija iesniegusi pied\u0101v\u0101jumu, attiec\u012bgi nav subjektu, kuru tiesisk\u0101s intereses b\u016btu aizsk\u0101rusi l\u012bguma nosl\u0113g\u0161ana un kuriem b\u016btu ties\u012bbas v\u0113rsties ties\u0101. AT \u0161\u0101dam viedoklim nepiekr\u012bt. Ties\u012bbas iebilst pret iepirkuma p\u0101rk\u0101pumiem un sekojo\u0161i ar\u012b nosl\u0113gto l\u012bgumu ir ieinteres\u0113tajai personai. Sen\u0101ts jau iepriek\u0161 ir atzinis, ka subjekt\u012bv\u0101s ties\u012bbas iesniegt pieteikumu ir ne tikai t\u0101m person\u0101m, kuras pieteiku\u0161\u0101s konkurs\u0101, bet ar\u012b t\u0101m, kuras bija paredz\u0113ju\u0161as to dar\u012bt.<\/b> Tom\u0113r personu interese nedr\u012bkst b\u016bt p\u0101r\u0101k att\u0101lin\u0101ta. Sen\u0101ta ieskat\u0101 par ieinteres\u0113to personu nav atz\u012bstama tikai t\u0101da persona, kas iesniegusi pied\u0101v\u0101jumu konkurs\u0101. Min\u0113t\u0101s ties\u012bbu normas tulkojamas pla\u0161\u0101k. Liet\u0101, \u0146emot v\u0113r\u0101 gan nolikuma apstr\u012bd\u0113\u0161anas faktu, gan ar\u012b pieteic\u0113jas paskaidrojumus, ir pamats pie\u0146emt, ka pieteic\u0113ja neiesniedza pied\u0101v\u0101jumu tie\u0161i pras\u012bbu d\u0113\u013c, jo, t\u0101s ieskat\u0101, nolikum\u0101 izvirz\u012bt\u0101s pras\u012bbas ir t\u0101das, kas konkursa m\u0113r\u0137a sasnieg\u0161anai nav nepiecie\u0161amas un ierobe\u017eo pretendentu loku. T\u0101 k\u0101 tie\u0161i pras\u012bbas var\u0113ja b\u016bt \u0161\u0137\u0113rslis dal\u012bbai un t\u0101 k\u0101 t\u0101s ir str\u012bda pamat\u0101, nav pamatots iest\u0101des arguments, ka pieteic\u0113ja nav ieinteres\u0113t\u0101 persona, jo t\u0101 faktiski nemaz nevar\u0113ja piedal\u012bties konkurs\u0101 un ieg\u016bt ties\u012bbas sl\u0113gt iepirkuma l\u012bgumu. L\u012bdz ar to ir saskat\u0101ma pieteic\u0113jas v\u0113lme ieg\u016bt ties\u012bbas sl\u0113gt l\u012bgumu, k\u0101 ar\u012b t\u0101s darb\u012bbas joma ir saist\u012bta ar b\u016bvniec\u012bbu. T\u0101d\u0113j\u0101di pieteic\u0113ja visp\u0101r var\u0113tu b\u016bt ieinteres\u0113ta ieg\u016bt l\u012bguma sl\u0113g\u0161anas ties\u012bbas \u0161\u0101da veida iepirkum\u0101. Lai ar\u012b pieteic\u0113ja nebija piedal\u012bjusies konkurs\u0101 un bija izsl\u0113gta, tom\u0113r str\u012bds par konkursa tiesiskumu un dal\u012bbnieku loku atkar\u012bb\u0101 no nolikuma pras\u012bb\u0101m var\u0113ja turpin\u0101ties. Tas ir pietiekams pamats uzskat\u012bt, ka nav konstat\u0113jams Publisko iepirkumu likuma (PIL) 60(9)1 min\u0113tais priek\u0161noteikums, kas b\u016btu par pamatu nogaid\u012b\u0161anas termi\u0146a neiev\u0113ro\u0161anai.<\/b> L\u012bdz ar to pirm\u0101s instances tiesa pamatoti secin\u0101ja, ka pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101jai bija j\u0101iev\u0113ro PIL 60(6) min\u0113tais nogaid\u012b\u0161anas termi\u0146\u0161. (18.12.2018. SKA-1675\/2018<\/b>)<\/p>\n

1. Nol\u0113mumus iesp\u0113jams atrast https:\/\/manas.tiesas.lv\/eTiesasMvc\/nolemumi<\/a>, lauk\u0101 \u201cMekl\u0113t nol\u0113muma tekst\u0101\u201d nor\u0101dot attiec\u012bgo numuru, k\u0101 ar\u012b AT m\u0101jaslap\u0101.\u21a9<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Kvalifik\u0101cijas pras\u012bbas AT ieskat\u0101 k\u0101d\u0101 liet\u0101 nevar nepaman\u012bt, ka kopum\u0101 speci\u0101listiem izvirz\u012bt\u0101s kvalifik\u0101cijas pras\u012bbas ir detaliz\u0113tas un specifiskas. Pras\u012bbu nians\u0113ta piel\u0101go\u0161ana konkr\u0113tai b\u016bvniec\u012bbai vai \u0113kai var novest pie t\u0101, ka kvalific\u0113ties sp\u0113j \u013coti \u0161aurs pieg\u0101d\u0101t\u0101ju loks. Tas var rad\u012bt ba\u017eas, ka nolikums, iesp\u0113jams, veidots t\u0101, lai piedal\u012bties var\u0113tu tikai viens pretendents.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[174,71,1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11207"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=11207"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11207\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11226,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11207\/revisions\/11226"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=11207"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=11207"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zurnalsiepirkumi.lv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=11207"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}